The impact of incorporating an eating disorder screening tool and an eating disorder diagnostic workshop in outpatient general psychiatry settings in publicly insured populations: a case series.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Eating Disorders Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1080/10640266.2025.2459972
Stuart B Murray, Cassandra E Friedlich, Talene Kesheshian
{"title":"The impact of incorporating an eating disorder screening tool and an eating disorder diagnostic workshop in outpatient general psychiatry settings in publicly insured populations: a case series.","authors":"Stuart B Murray, Cassandra E Friedlich, Talene Kesheshian","doi":"10.1080/10640266.2025.2459972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With an elevated prevalence of disordered eating in low-income settings, efforts to optimize the detection of eating disorders (EDs) in such settings are necessary. A significant barrier relates to the scarcity of training for clinicians not working in specialized ED settings. This manuscript assessed the impact of an ED screening tool and an ED assessment workshop upon the detection of EDs in publicly insured psychiatry settings. Leveraging a case series design to assess 165 consecutive adult patients in outpatient psychiatry settings, we indexed the prevalence of ED diagnoses rendered by psychiatrists when assessing patients (i) without prior knowledge of ED symptoms, (ii) after being made aware of patient scores from an ED screening measure, and (iii) after undergoing an ED assessment workshop, and being made aware of patient screening scores. While 27% of the sample reported clinically significant ED symptoms on the screening measure, ED diagnoses were only rendered in 2% of the sample when psychiatrists were not made aware of ED symptoms prior to assessment. In contrast, incorporating a screening tool altered the rates of ED diagnoses, with 18% of the sample receiving an ED diagnosis. Moreover, the combinatorial introduction of both the ED screening measure and an ED assessment workshop further altered diagnostic practice-with this resulting in ED diagnoses in 27% of the sample. The findings suggest that ED screening and training workshops can have significant impacts on diagnostic accuracy and, with little cost, can provide patients with diagnoses that would otherwise go undetected.</p>","PeriodicalId":48835,"journal":{"name":"Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2025.2459972","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With an elevated prevalence of disordered eating in low-income settings, efforts to optimize the detection of eating disorders (EDs) in such settings are necessary. A significant barrier relates to the scarcity of training for clinicians not working in specialized ED settings. This manuscript assessed the impact of an ED screening tool and an ED assessment workshop upon the detection of EDs in publicly insured psychiatry settings. Leveraging a case series design to assess 165 consecutive adult patients in outpatient psychiatry settings, we indexed the prevalence of ED diagnoses rendered by psychiatrists when assessing patients (i) without prior knowledge of ED symptoms, (ii) after being made aware of patient scores from an ED screening measure, and (iii) after undergoing an ED assessment workshop, and being made aware of patient screening scores. While 27% of the sample reported clinically significant ED symptoms on the screening measure, ED diagnoses were only rendered in 2% of the sample when psychiatrists were not made aware of ED symptoms prior to assessment. In contrast, incorporating a screening tool altered the rates of ED diagnoses, with 18% of the sample receiving an ED diagnosis. Moreover, the combinatorial introduction of both the ED screening measure and an ED assessment workshop further altered diagnostic practice-with this resulting in ED diagnoses in 27% of the sample. The findings suggest that ED screening and training workshops can have significant impacts on diagnostic accuracy and, with little cost, can provide patients with diagnoses that would otherwise go undetected.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Eating Disorders
Eating Disorders PSYCHIATRY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Eating Disorders is contemporary and wide ranging, and takes a fundamentally practical, humanistic, compassionate view of clients and their presenting problems. You’ll find a multidisciplinary perspective on clinical issues and prevention research that considers the essential cultural, social, familial, and personal elements that not only foster eating-related problems, but also furnish clues that facilitate the most effective possible therapies and treatment approaches.
期刊最新文献
The impact of patient weight on US mental health providers' diagnosis of bulimia nervosa. The impact of incorporating an eating disorder screening tool and an eating disorder diagnostic workshop in outpatient general psychiatry settings in publicly insured populations: a case series. Level of family involvement as a predictor of outcome in eating disorder patients with and without provisional PTSD during residential treatment. An evaluation of lived experience email peer support for young people with eating disorders. Eating disorder treatment experiences among racially/ethnically minoritized samples.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1