The impact of patient weight on US mental health providers' diagnosis of bulimia nervosa.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Eating Disorders Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1080/10640266.2025.2465153
Dakota L Leget, Rebecca L Pearl
{"title":"The impact of patient weight on US mental health providers' diagnosis of bulimia nervosa.","authors":"Dakota L Leget, Rebecca L Pearl","doi":"10.1080/10640266.2025.2465153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined how patient weight influences mental health providers' diagnosis of bulimia nervosa (BN). US mental health providers (<i>N</i> = 200) from PsychologyToday.com and professional listservs participated in an online experiment, reading vignettes about patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and BN with the compensatory behavior of excessive exercise. For the BN vignette, participants were randomized to read about a patient whose weight status was described as \"healthy weight\" or \"obesity.\" Participants reported their diagnoses, confidence, treatment recommendations, and perceived symptom severity. Only 27% of participants accurately diagnosed BN, with 38% of participants instead diagnosing binge eating disorder. There were no significant differences between weight conditions in diagnostic accuracy, confidence, or treatment recommendations for the BN vignette (<i>p</i>s > .05). However, symptoms within the BN vignette were perceived as more severe in the \"obesity\" condition compared to the \"healthy weight\" condition (<i>M</i> = 5.08 ± 0.80 vs. <i>M</i> = 4.72 ± 0.99 on a 1-7 scale, <i>p</i> = .005). Within-subjects analyses revealed that participants were more accurate and confident in diagnosing MDD than BN (<i>p</i>s < .01). These findings suggest poor detection of BN among mental health providers when patients present with healthy or higher weights. Providers may benefit from improved training for detecting BN when excessive exercise is used as the primary compensatory behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":48835,"journal":{"name":"Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2025.2465153","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined how patient weight influences mental health providers' diagnosis of bulimia nervosa (BN). US mental health providers (N = 200) from PsychologyToday.com and professional listservs participated in an online experiment, reading vignettes about patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and BN with the compensatory behavior of excessive exercise. For the BN vignette, participants were randomized to read about a patient whose weight status was described as "healthy weight" or "obesity." Participants reported their diagnoses, confidence, treatment recommendations, and perceived symptom severity. Only 27% of participants accurately diagnosed BN, with 38% of participants instead diagnosing binge eating disorder. There were no significant differences between weight conditions in diagnostic accuracy, confidence, or treatment recommendations for the BN vignette (ps > .05). However, symptoms within the BN vignette were perceived as more severe in the "obesity" condition compared to the "healthy weight" condition (M = 5.08 ± 0.80 vs. M = 4.72 ± 0.99 on a 1-7 scale, p = .005). Within-subjects analyses revealed that participants were more accurate and confident in diagnosing MDD than BN (ps < .01). These findings suggest poor detection of BN among mental health providers when patients present with healthy or higher weights. Providers may benefit from improved training for detecting BN when excessive exercise is used as the primary compensatory behavior.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者体重对美国心理健康提供者对神经性贪食症诊断的影响
本研究探讨了患者体重如何影响心理健康提供者对神经性贪食症(BN)的诊断。来自PsychologyToday.com的美国心理健康提供者(N = 200)和专业listservs参与了一项在线实验,阅读关于重度抑郁症(MDD)和BN患者的小短文,这些患者有过度运动的代偿行为。对于BN小插图,参与者被随机分配阅读一个体重状况被描述为“健康体重”或“肥胖”的患者。参与者报告了他们的诊断、信心、治疗建议和感觉到的症状严重程度。只有27%的参与者准确诊断出BN, 38%的参与者诊断出暴食症。体重状况之间在诊断准确性、置信度或治疗建议方面没有显著差异(ps >.05)。然而,与“健康体重”组相比,BN组的症状在“肥胖”组中被认为更严重(M = 5.08±0.80 vs. M = 4.72±0.99,在1-7量表上,p = 0.005)。受试者内部分析显示,受试者对MDD的诊断比BN更准确、更有信心(ps < 0.01)。这些发现表明,当患者健康或体重较高时,精神卫生服务提供者对BN的检测较差。当过度运动被用作主要代偿行为时,提供者可能会从检测BN的改进训练中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Eating Disorders
Eating Disorders PSYCHIATRY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Eating Disorders is contemporary and wide ranging, and takes a fundamentally practical, humanistic, compassionate view of clients and their presenting problems. You’ll find a multidisciplinary perspective on clinical issues and prevention research that considers the essential cultural, social, familial, and personal elements that not only foster eating-related problems, but also furnish clues that facilitate the most effective possible therapies and treatment approaches.
期刊最新文献
Concurrent delivery of written exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder treatment in an intensive eating disorder program: a case series. Eating disorder treatment experiences among racially/ethnically minoritized samples. An evaluation of lived experience email peer support for young people with eating disorders. Level of family involvement as a predictor of outcome in eating disorder patients with and without provisional PTSD during residential treatment. The impact of incorporating an eating disorder screening tool and an eating disorder diagnostic workshop in outpatient general psychiatry settings in publicly insured populations: a case series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1