Emily K Volk, Arielle L Clauser, Melissa E Kreider, Diego D Soetrisno, Sunilkumar Khandavalli, Joshua D Sugar, Stephanie Kwon, Shaun M Alia
{"title":"Role of the Ionomer in Supporting Electrolyte-Fed Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzers.","authors":"Emily K Volk, Arielle L Clauser, Melissa E Kreider, Diego D Soetrisno, Sunilkumar Khandavalli, Joshua D Sugar, Stephanie Kwon, Shaun M Alia","doi":"10.1021/acselectrochem.4c00061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers (AEMWEs) have achieved significant performance advances in recent decades, overpotentials remain high relative to their proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer (PEMWE) counterparts, requiring AEMWE-specific catalyst layer design strategies to further advance this technology. In this work, the role of the ionomer in catalyst layer structure and quality, catalyst layer stability, and ion conduction for supporting electrolyte-fed AEMWEs is assessed for catalyst layers composed of NiFe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>4</sub> and PiperION TP85 from Versogen at variable ionomer contents (0-30 wt %) for tests up to 200 h. The results reveal that, for supporting electrolyte-fed AEM devices, the ionomer is not required for ion conduction through the catalyst layer. Instead, the ionomer is found to play a critical role in catalyst layer structure and stability, where intermediate ionomer contents lead to the lowest overpotentials, highest effective surface areas, and lowest catalyst layer resistances. Catalyst layer stability is found to be a function of both catalyst adhesion and ionomer loss. These results show that an ionomer may be selected which is not of the same chemistry as the anion exchange membrane, mitigating ionomer stability concerns throughout the catalyst layer and offering a pathway towards highly active and stable AEMWEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":520400,"journal":{"name":"ACS electrochemistry","volume":"1 2","pages":"239-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11808641/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS electrochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acselectrochem.4c00061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
While anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers (AEMWEs) have achieved significant performance advances in recent decades, overpotentials remain high relative to their proton exchange membrane water electrolyzer (PEMWE) counterparts, requiring AEMWE-specific catalyst layer design strategies to further advance this technology. In this work, the role of the ionomer in catalyst layer structure and quality, catalyst layer stability, and ion conduction for supporting electrolyte-fed AEMWEs is assessed for catalyst layers composed of NiFe2O4 and PiperION TP85 from Versogen at variable ionomer contents (0-30 wt %) for tests up to 200 h. The results reveal that, for supporting electrolyte-fed AEM devices, the ionomer is not required for ion conduction through the catalyst layer. Instead, the ionomer is found to play a critical role in catalyst layer structure and stability, where intermediate ionomer contents lead to the lowest overpotentials, highest effective surface areas, and lowest catalyst layer resistances. Catalyst layer stability is found to be a function of both catalyst adhesion and ionomer loss. These results show that an ionomer may be selected which is not of the same chemistry as the anion exchange membrane, mitigating ionomer stability concerns throughout the catalyst layer and offering a pathway towards highly active and stable AEMWEs.