Characterizing the odor of New Zealand native plants using sensory analysis and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

IF 3.4 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Food Science Pub Date : 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1111/1750-3841.70050
Scott C. Hutchings, Santanu Deb-Choudhury, Arvind K. Subbaraj, Luis Guerrero, Damir D. Torrico, Elizabeth E. Ham, Carolina E. Realini
{"title":"Characterizing the odor of New Zealand native plants using sensory analysis and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry","authors":"Scott C. Hutchings,&nbsp;Santanu Deb-Choudhury,&nbsp;Arvind K. Subbaraj,&nbsp;Luis Guerrero,&nbsp;Damir D. Torrico,&nbsp;Elizabeth E. Ham,&nbsp;Carolina E. Realini","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is growing interest by consumers worldwide for edible indigenous plants and wild foods. To highlight and enhance their unique sensory properties, comprehensive sensory characterization is essential to understand and refine their sensory attributes. The aim of this study was to characterize the odor of six edible native New Zealand plants that have significant potential in food applications, using sensory analysis and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), and uncover the link between annotated volatile compounds and the desirable odor attributes that drive consumer acceptance. A lexicon of 22 odor attributes was developed through six focus groups of six consumers each (<i>n</i> = 36). A Rate All That Apply (RATA) trial was undertaken with consumers (<i>n</i> = 121) to describe the intensity of the odor attributes and overall consumer liking of the odor of each plant. Results showed the characterization of the plant's odor differed significantly across species. Horopito was characterized as “herby,” “peppery,” “spicy,” “minty,” and “citrus”; kawakawa was “sour,” “sweet,” “floral,” and “fruity”; pikopiko and kiokio were “earthy/musty,” “dry grass/hay,” and “fishy”; red matipo was “sweet,” “fruity,” “sour,” “leafy,” and “green tea”; and lemonwood was “leafy” and “grassy.” Horopito was the most preferred odor by consumers, and pikopiko the least. GC–MS annotated 178 volatile compounds and their peak intensity across the six species. Stepwise regression shortlisted 42 volatile compounds (of which terpenes were the most common) that best explained each of the 22 odor attributes. These results can assist with the application of these native plants as food ingredients.</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1750-3841.70050","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://ift.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is growing interest by consumers worldwide for edible indigenous plants and wild foods. To highlight and enhance their unique sensory properties, comprehensive sensory characterization is essential to understand and refine their sensory attributes. The aim of this study was to characterize the odor of six edible native New Zealand plants that have significant potential in food applications, using sensory analysis and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), and uncover the link between annotated volatile compounds and the desirable odor attributes that drive consumer acceptance. A lexicon of 22 odor attributes was developed through six focus groups of six consumers each (n = 36). A Rate All That Apply (RATA) trial was undertaken with consumers (n = 121) to describe the intensity of the odor attributes and overall consumer liking of the odor of each plant. Results showed the characterization of the plant's odor differed significantly across species. Horopito was characterized as “herby,” “peppery,” “spicy,” “minty,” and “citrus”; kawakawa was “sour,” “sweet,” “floral,” and “fruity”; pikopiko and kiokio were “earthy/musty,” “dry grass/hay,” and “fishy”; red matipo was “sweet,” “fruity,” “sour,” “leafy,” and “green tea”; and lemonwood was “leafy” and “grassy.” Horopito was the most preferred odor by consumers, and pikopiko the least. GC–MS annotated 178 volatile compounds and their peak intensity across the six species. Stepwise regression shortlisted 42 volatile compounds (of which terpenes were the most common) that best explained each of the 22 odor attributes. These results can assist with the application of these native plants as food ingredients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用感官分析和气相色谱-质谱联用技术表征新西兰本土植物的气味
世界各地的消费者对可食用的本土植物和野生食品的兴趣日益浓厚。为了突出和增强其独特的感官特性,全面的感官表征是理解和完善其感官特性的必要条件。本研究的目的是利用感官分析和气相色谱-质谱联用(GC-MS)技术,表征六种在食品应用中具有重要潜力的新西兰本土可食用植物的气味,并揭示标注的挥发性化合物与驱动消费者接受的理想气味属性之间的联系。一个包含22种气味属性的词典是通过6个焦点小组开发的,每个小组有6个消费者(n = 36)。对消费者(n = 121)进行了RATA试验,以描述气味属性的强度和消费者对每种植物气味的总体喜爱程度。结果表明,不同物种的植物气味特征存在显著差异。Horopito的特点是“香草”、“胡椒”、“辛辣”、“薄荷”和“柑橘”;川川是“酸的”、“甜的”、“花香的”和“果味的”;Pikopiko和kiokio分别代表“泥土的/发霉的”、“干草/干草”和“腥的”;红麻婆鱼是“甜的”、“果味的”、“酸的”、“多叶的”和“绿茶”;柠檬木是“多叶的”和“有草的”。Horopito是消费者最喜欢的气味,pikopiko是最不喜欢的。GC-MS注释了178种挥发性化合物及其峰强度。逐步回归列出了42种挥发性化合物(其中萜烯是最常见的),最能解释22种气味属性。这些结果有助于这些本土植物作为食品原料的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science
Journal of Food Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science. The range of topics covered in the journal include: -Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science -New Horizons in Food Research -Integrated Food Science -Food Chemistry -Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology -Food Microbiology and Safety -Sensory and Consumer Sciences -Health, Nutrition, and Food -Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.
期刊最新文献
Quality Differentiation and Mechanistic Insights Into Green Tea Processed by Different Fixation Methods. Effect of Different Pre-Treatments on Shell Peeling of Litopenaeus vannamei and Changes of Muscle Quality Under Refrigeration. Influence of Cashew Agro-Industrial By-Product (Anacardium occidentale) and Cashew Tree Gum on the Properties of Sponge Cakes: A Fat Replacement Approach. Functional Evaluation of Fermented Pomegranate Juice in Vitro and in Vivo and Its Impact on the Gut Microbiota. High-Resolution Neuraminidase Inhibition Profiling of Synsepalum Dulcificum Based on UPLC-MS/MS: A Study of Anti-Influenza Constituents in a Potential Edible Resource.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1