Scott C. Hutchings, Santanu Deb-Choudhury, Arvind K. Subbaraj, Luis Guerrero, Damir D. Torrico, Elizabeth E. Ham, Carolina E. Realini
{"title":"Characterizing the odor of New Zealand native plants using sensory analysis and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry","authors":"Scott C. Hutchings, Santanu Deb-Choudhury, Arvind K. Subbaraj, Luis Guerrero, Damir D. Torrico, Elizabeth E. Ham, Carolina E. Realini","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.70050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is growing interest by consumers worldwide for edible indigenous plants and wild foods. To highlight and enhance their unique sensory properties, comprehensive sensory characterization is essential to understand and refine their sensory attributes. The aim of this study was to characterize the odor of six edible native New Zealand plants that have significant potential in food applications, using sensory analysis and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), and uncover the link between annotated volatile compounds and the desirable odor attributes that drive consumer acceptance. A lexicon of 22 odor attributes was developed through six focus groups of six consumers each (<i>n</i> = 36). A Rate All That Apply (RATA) trial was undertaken with consumers (<i>n</i> = 121) to describe the intensity of the odor attributes and overall consumer liking of the odor of each plant. Results showed the characterization of the plant's odor differed significantly across species. Horopito was characterized as “herby,” “peppery,” “spicy,” “minty,” and “citrus”; kawakawa was “sour,” “sweet,” “floral,” and “fruity”; pikopiko and kiokio were “earthy/musty,” “dry grass/hay,” and “fishy”; red matipo was “sweet,” “fruity,” “sour,” “leafy,” and “green tea”; and lemonwood was “leafy” and “grassy.” Horopito was the most preferred odor by consumers, and pikopiko the least. GC–MS annotated 178 volatile compounds and their peak intensity across the six species. Stepwise regression shortlisted 42 volatile compounds (of which terpenes were the most common) that best explained each of the 22 odor attributes. These results can assist with the application of these native plants as food ingredients.</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1750-3841.70050","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.70050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is growing interest by consumers worldwide for edible indigenous plants and wild foods. To highlight and enhance their unique sensory properties, comprehensive sensory characterization is essential to understand and refine their sensory attributes. The aim of this study was to characterize the odor of six edible native New Zealand plants that have significant potential in food applications, using sensory analysis and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), and uncover the link between annotated volatile compounds and the desirable odor attributes that drive consumer acceptance. A lexicon of 22 odor attributes was developed through six focus groups of six consumers each (n = 36). A Rate All That Apply (RATA) trial was undertaken with consumers (n = 121) to describe the intensity of the odor attributes and overall consumer liking of the odor of each plant. Results showed the characterization of the plant's odor differed significantly across species. Horopito was characterized as “herby,” “peppery,” “spicy,” “minty,” and “citrus”; kawakawa was “sour,” “sweet,” “floral,” and “fruity”; pikopiko and kiokio were “earthy/musty,” “dry grass/hay,” and “fishy”; red matipo was “sweet,” “fruity,” “sour,” “leafy,” and “green tea”; and lemonwood was “leafy” and “grassy.” Horopito was the most preferred odor by consumers, and pikopiko the least. GC–MS annotated 178 volatile compounds and their peak intensity across the six species. Stepwise regression shortlisted 42 volatile compounds (of which terpenes were the most common) that best explained each of the 22 odor attributes. These results can assist with the application of these native plants as food ingredients.
期刊介绍:
The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science.
The range of topics covered in the journal include:
-Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science
-New Horizons in Food Research
-Integrated Food Science
-Food Chemistry
-Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology
-Food Microbiology and Safety
-Sensory and Consumer Sciences
-Health, Nutrition, and Food
-Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety
The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.