Urease-Catalyzed Microbial and Enzymatic Carbonate Precipitation for Eco-Friendly Heavy Metal Remediation.

IF 2 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Letters in Applied Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1093/lambio/ovaf022
Adharsh Rajasekar, Armstrong Ighodalo Omoregie, Kan Fock Kui
{"title":"Urease-Catalyzed Microbial and Enzymatic Carbonate Precipitation for Eco-Friendly Heavy Metal Remediation.","authors":"Adharsh Rajasekar, Armstrong Ighodalo Omoregie, Kan Fock Kui","doi":"10.1093/lambio/ovaf022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Heavy metal contamination significantly threatens environmental and public health, necessitating effective and sustainable remediation technologies. This review explores two innovative bioremediation techniques: Microbially Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation (MICP) and Enzyme-Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation (EICP). Both techniques show promise for immobilizing heavy metals in laboratory and field settings. MICP utilizes the metabolic activity of ureolytic microorganisms to precipitate calcium carbonate (CaCO3), sequestering heavy metals such as lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), and arsenic (As) as stable metal-carbonate complexes. EICP, on the other hand, employs urease enzymes to catalyze calcium carbonate precipitation, offering greater control over reaction conditions and higher efficiency in environments unfavorable to microbial activity. This mini-review compares the mechanisms of MICP and EICP, focusing on factors influencing their performance, including enzyme or microbial activity, pH, temperature, and nutrient availability. Case studies illustrate their success in sequestering heavy metals, emphasizing their practical applications and environmental benefits. A comparative analysis highlights the strengths and limitations of MICP and EICP regarding cost, scalability, and challenges. This review synthesizes research to support the advancement of MICP and EICP as sustainable solutions for mitigating heavy metal contamination.</p>","PeriodicalId":17962,"journal":{"name":"Letters in Applied Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Letters in Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lambio/ovaf022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Heavy metal contamination significantly threatens environmental and public health, necessitating effective and sustainable remediation technologies. This review explores two innovative bioremediation techniques: Microbially Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation (MICP) and Enzyme-Induced Calcium Carbonate Precipitation (EICP). Both techniques show promise for immobilizing heavy metals in laboratory and field settings. MICP utilizes the metabolic activity of ureolytic microorganisms to precipitate calcium carbonate (CaCO3), sequestering heavy metals such as lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), and arsenic (As) as stable metal-carbonate complexes. EICP, on the other hand, employs urease enzymes to catalyze calcium carbonate precipitation, offering greater control over reaction conditions and higher efficiency in environments unfavorable to microbial activity. This mini-review compares the mechanisms of MICP and EICP, focusing on factors influencing their performance, including enzyme or microbial activity, pH, temperature, and nutrient availability. Case studies illustrate their success in sequestering heavy metals, emphasizing their practical applications and environmental benefits. A comparative analysis highlights the strengths and limitations of MICP and EICP regarding cost, scalability, and challenges. This review synthesizes research to support the advancement of MICP and EICP as sustainable solutions for mitigating heavy metal contamination.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Letters in Applied Microbiology
Letters in Applied Microbiology 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
225
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of & Letters in Applied Microbiology are two of the flagship research journals of the Society for Applied Microbiology (SfAM). For more than 75 years they have been publishing top quality research and reviews in the broad field of applied microbiology. The journals are provided to all SfAM members as well as having a global online readership totalling more than 500,000 downloads per year in more than 200 countries. Submitting authors can expect fast decision and publication times, averaging 33 days to first decision and 34 days from acceptance to online publication. There are no page charges.
期刊最新文献
Clonal expression and structural analysis of polylactic acid degrading enzyme S8SP from Bacillus safensis. Exploring the Anti-Obesity Effects of Lactobacillus in C57BL/6 mice: Mechanisms, Interventions, and Future Directions. Urease-Catalyzed Microbial and Enzymatic Carbonate Precipitation for Eco-Friendly Heavy Metal Remediation. Learn from AI: The pursuit of objectivity. Insight into the bacterial communities in the sediment water interface across different salinities in Pacific White shrimp, Penaeus vannamei by metabarcoding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1