Laser-Activated Irrigation via Photon-Induced Photoacoustic Streaming and Shock Wave Enhanced Emission on Smear Layer Removal Efficacy, Pushout Bond Strength, and Sealer Adaptation: A SEM Assessment

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY Microscopy Research and Technique Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1002/jemt.24821
Basil Almutairi, Fahad Alkhudhairy
{"title":"Laser-Activated Irrigation via Photon-Induced Photoacoustic Streaming and Shock Wave Enhanced Emission on Smear Layer Removal Efficacy, Pushout Bond Strength, and Sealer Adaptation: A SEM Assessment","authors":"Basil Almutairi,&nbsp;Fahad Alkhudhairy","doi":"10.1002/jemt.24821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The study aims to assess the effectiveness of four different root canal disinfection techniques: passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), photon induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS), and shock wave enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS) on the smear layer (SL) removal, pushout bond strength (PBS) and sealer adaptation to the radicular dentin. Root canal treatment of 64 human mandibular premolars was initiated. Disinfection was performed. Group 1 (2.5% NaOCl (SI) + EDTA), Group 2 (2.5% NaOCl (PUI) + EDTA), Group 3 (2.5% NaOCl (PIPS) + EDTA), and Group 4 (2.5%NaOCl (SWEEP) + EDTA). This was followed by obturation and sectioning at three different thirds of the canal. Universal testing machine (UTM) and stereomicroscope assessed the PBS and failure mode. Residual SL and sealer dentin interface were assessed via SEM. To compare the mean scores among tested groups, one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test were applied (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) The lowest residual SL (1.22 ± 0.11) and highest PBS (11.27 ± 0.09 MPa) were observed in the cervical third of Group 3 (2.5% NaOCl + PIPS). However, the highest remaining SL (2.51 ± 0.08) and lowest bond strength (8.11 ± 0.12 MPa) were observed in the apical third of Group 1 (2.5% NaOCl + SI) Laser-activated irrigation (PIPS, SWEEPS) presents a promising approach for improving the efficacy of SL removal and enhancing the adhesion and bond strength of root canal sealers to root dentin.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18684,"journal":{"name":"Microscopy Research and Technique","volume":"88 6","pages":"1806-1815"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microscopy Research and Technique","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jemt.24821","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aims to assess the effectiveness of four different root canal disinfection techniques: passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), photon induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS), and shock wave enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS) on the smear layer (SL) removal, pushout bond strength (PBS) and sealer adaptation to the radicular dentin. Root canal treatment of 64 human mandibular premolars was initiated. Disinfection was performed. Group 1 (2.5% NaOCl (SI) + EDTA), Group 2 (2.5% NaOCl (PUI) + EDTA), Group 3 (2.5% NaOCl (PIPS) + EDTA), and Group 4 (2.5%NaOCl (SWEEP) + EDTA). This was followed by obturation and sectioning at three different thirds of the canal. Universal testing machine (UTM) and stereomicroscope assessed the PBS and failure mode. Residual SL and sealer dentin interface were assessed via SEM. To compare the mean scores among tested groups, one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test were applied (p < 0.05) The lowest residual SL (1.22 ± 0.11) and highest PBS (11.27 ± 0.09 MPa) were observed in the cervical third of Group 3 (2.5% NaOCl + PIPS). However, the highest remaining SL (2.51 ± 0.08) and lowest bond strength (8.11 ± 0.12 MPa) were observed in the apical third of Group 1 (2.5% NaOCl + SI) Laser-activated irrigation (PIPS, SWEEPS) presents a promising approach for improving the efficacy of SL removal and enhancing the adhesion and bond strength of root canal sealers to root dentin.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过光子诱导光声流和激波增强发射的激光激活灌溉对涂抹层去除效果、推出结合强度和封口处适应性的影响:扫描电镜评估。
本研究旨在评估四种不同的根管消毒技术的有效性:被动超声冲洗(PUI)、光子诱导光声流(PIPS)和冲击波增强发射光声流(SWEEPS)在去除涂抹层(SL)、推出结合强度(PBS)和根状牙本质密封剂适应方面的效果。对64颗人下颌前磨牙进行根管治疗。消毒处理。1组(2.5%NaOCl (SI) + EDTA)、2组(2.5%NaOCl (PUI) + EDTA)、3组(2.5%NaOCl (PIPS) + EDTA)、4组(2.5%NaOCl (SWEEP) + EDTA)。随后在三个不同的三分之一的管道进行封闭和切片。通用试验机(UTM)和体视显微镜评估了PBS和失效模式。通过扫描电镜(SEM)评估牙本质界面残留的SL和密封剂。为了比较各组的平均得分,采用单因素方差分析和事后Tukey检验(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Microscopy Research and Technique
Microscopy Research and Technique 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
233
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Microscopy Research and Technique (MRT) publishes articles on all aspects of advanced microscopy original architecture and methodologies with applications in the biological, clinical, chemical, and materials sciences. Original basic and applied research as well as technical papers dealing with the various subsets of microscopy are encouraged. MRT is the right form for those developing new microscopy methods or using the microscope to answer key questions in basic and applied research.
期刊最新文献
Spectral Phasor Analysis for Hyperspectral Imaging to Elucidate Acridine Orange Photophysics in Cells. Zinc Iodide-Osmium Tetroxide (ZIO) Staining Reveals Differences in the Components of the Endomembrane System of Plant Secretory Cells. Lightweight Truncated Fused-MirrorNet for Classification and Analysis of Histopathology Images. Issue Information Real-Time Modulation of DNA Conductivity via Magnetic Fields Studied by C-AFM.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1