Development and validation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment for People with Vision Impairment (MOCA-VI).

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1037/pas0001357
Piers Dawes, David Reeves, Wai Kent Yeung, Fiona Holland, Anna Pavlina Charalambous, Renaud David, Catherine Helmer, Lisa Keay, Sheela Kumaran, Rebecca E Leighton, Julie-Anne Little, Ralph N Martins, Marianne Piano, Antonis Politis, Annie Pye, Gail Robinson, Gregor Russell, Saima Sheikh, Hamid R Sohrabi, Chryssoula Thodi, Kathleen Gallant, Ziad Nasreddine, Iracema Leroi
{"title":"Development and validation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment for People with Vision Impairment (MOCA-VI).","authors":"Piers Dawes, David Reeves, Wai Kent Yeung, Fiona Holland, Anna Pavlina Charalambous, Renaud David, Catherine Helmer, Lisa Keay, Sheela Kumaran, Rebecca E Leighton, Julie-Anne Little, Ralph N Martins, Marianne Piano, Antonis Politis, Annie Pye, Gail Robinson, Gregor Russell, Saima Sheikh, Hamid R Sohrabi, Chryssoula Thodi, Kathleen Gallant, Ziad Nasreddine, Iracema Leroi","doi":"10.1037/pas0001357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vision impairment is common among older adults and affects dementia screening assessments, which include visually presented items. We developed and validated a version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for people with vision impairment that includes all the cognitive domains included in the standard MoCA. Visual components of the MoCA were adapted by developing alternative spoken forms. We used both individual item analysis and item substitution to identify the optimal set of alternative items for inclusion in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment for People With Vision Impairment (MoCA-VI) in place of the original items to maximize sensitivity and specificity for dementia. We evaluated the performance and reliability of the final tool, including adjustments for demographic factors. One hundred twenty-eight participants with vision impairment (presenting distance visual acuity worse than 6/12), 79 cognitively healthy and 49 with dementia, completed the adapted MoCA. An additional 86 participants with normal vision completed the standard MoCA and alternative items to assess score equivalence and independence from vision impairment. Twenty-six participants were retested 2-4 weeks after initial testing. With the optimal item set, the final MoCA-VI had an area under the curve of 0.96 (95% CI [0.93, 0.99]). At a cut point of 24 points or less, sensitivity was 95.9%, with a specificity of 92.4%. The intraclass correlation for test-retest reliability was 0.84 (95% CI [0.81, 0.96]). The MoCA-VI is a specific and reliable test for possible dementia among adults with vision impairment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20770,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Assessment","volume":"37 3","pages":"114-122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001357","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vision impairment is common among older adults and affects dementia screening assessments, which include visually presented items. We developed and validated a version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for people with vision impairment that includes all the cognitive domains included in the standard MoCA. Visual components of the MoCA were adapted by developing alternative spoken forms. We used both individual item analysis and item substitution to identify the optimal set of alternative items for inclusion in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment for People With Vision Impairment (MoCA-VI) in place of the original items to maximize sensitivity and specificity for dementia. We evaluated the performance and reliability of the final tool, including adjustments for demographic factors. One hundred twenty-eight participants with vision impairment (presenting distance visual acuity worse than 6/12), 79 cognitively healthy and 49 with dementia, completed the adapted MoCA. An additional 86 participants with normal vision completed the standard MoCA and alternative items to assess score equivalence and independence from vision impairment. Twenty-six participants were retested 2-4 weeks after initial testing. With the optimal item set, the final MoCA-VI had an area under the curve of 0.96 (95% CI [0.93, 0.99]). At a cut point of 24 points or less, sensitivity was 95.9%, with a specificity of 92.4%. The intraclass correlation for test-retest reliability was 0.84 (95% CI [0.81, 0.96]). The MoCA-VI is a specific and reliable test for possible dementia among adults with vision impairment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蒙特利尔视力障碍者认知评估(MOCA-VI)的开发与验证。
视力障碍在老年人中很常见,并影响痴呆症筛查评估,其中包括视觉呈现的项目。我们为视力障碍人士开发并验证了蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)的一个版本,它包括了标准MoCA中包含的所有认知领域。MoCA的视觉组成部分通过发展替代口语形式进行了调整。我们使用单项分析和项目替代来确定蒙特利尔视力障碍患者认知评估(MoCA-VI)中包含的最佳替代项目集,以取代原始项目,以最大限度地提高痴呆的敏感性和特异性。我们评估了最终工具的性能和可靠性,包括人口因素的调整。128名视力障碍患者(远视灵敏度低于6/12)、79名认知健康者和49名痴呆患者完成了适应性MoCA。另外86名视力正常的参与者完成了标准MoCA和替代项目,以评估评分的等效性和视力障碍的独立性。26名参与者在初次测试后2-4周重新测试。在最优项目集下,最终MoCA-VI曲线下面积为0.96 (95% CI[0.93, 0.99])。切点小于等于24点时,灵敏度为95.9%,特异度为92.4%。重测信度的类内相关系数为0.84 (95% CI[0.81, 0.96])。MoCA-VI是一个特定的和可靠的测试可能痴呆的成人视力障碍。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Assessment
Psychological Assessment PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Psychological Assessment is concerned mainly with empirical research on measurement and evaluation relevant to the broad field of clinical psychology. Submissions are welcome in the areas of assessment processes and methods. Included are - clinical judgment and the application of decision-making models - paradigms derived from basic psychological research in cognition, personality–social psychology, and biological psychology - development, validation, and application of assessment instruments, observational methods, and interviews
期刊最新文献
Automated scoring of the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire with fine-tuned large language models. Measurement invariance of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) across age groups in a German representative sample: An application of confirmatory factor analysis using k-fold cross-validation. Measuring parenting interactions in resource-constrained settings: Evidence from an observational tool implemented in Andean Peru. Do the Beck Depression Inventory-II and Beck Hopelessness Scale reliably capture systematic change and within-person variation? Evidence from generalizability theory. Taking measurement-based care to school: Evaluating teacher-report versions of the behavior and feelings survey and the top problems assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1