Heat stress mitigation by trees and shelters at bus stops

IF 7.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2025.104653
Kevin Lanza , Sara Ernst , Katie Watkins , Baojiang Chen
{"title":"Heat stress mitigation by trees and shelters at bus stops","authors":"Kevin Lanza ,&nbsp;Sara Ernst ,&nbsp;Katie Watkins ,&nbsp;Baojiang Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Municipalities are attempting to create safe and comfortable transit systems in the face of climate change. Herein, we determined how trees and different shelter designs impact heat stress at bus stops. Over 13 summer days in 2023, we used sensors to measure wet bulb globe temperature in the shade from trees and four different shelter designs to compare with unshaded areas at 17 bus stops in Houston, Texas. Results from multilevel linear mixed effects modeling revealed that tree-shaded areas were 3.2 °C (5.8 °F) cooler than unshaded areas (p &lt; 0.001). Shelters provided less cooling than trees, and enclosed shelters were less effective than open designs. Further, heat stress was more than 3 °C (5.4 °F) higher under unshaded, enclosed shelters than unshaded areas outside of shelters (p &lt; 0.001). Tree planting at transit stops may be a top option to improve heat safety, and shelters, if improperly designed, may be a form of maladaptation, amplifying health risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 104653"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136192092500063X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Municipalities are attempting to create safe and comfortable transit systems in the face of climate change. Herein, we determined how trees and different shelter designs impact heat stress at bus stops. Over 13 summer days in 2023, we used sensors to measure wet bulb globe temperature in the shade from trees and four different shelter designs to compare with unshaded areas at 17 bus stops in Houston, Texas. Results from multilevel linear mixed effects modeling revealed that tree-shaded areas were 3.2 °C (5.8 °F) cooler than unshaded areas (p < 0.001). Shelters provided less cooling than trees, and enclosed shelters were less effective than open designs. Further, heat stress was more than 3 °C (5.4 °F) higher under unshaded, enclosed shelters than unshaded areas outside of shelters (p < 0.001). Tree planting at transit stops may be a top option to improve heat safety, and shelters, if improperly designed, may be a form of maladaptation, amplifying health risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在公交车站用树木和遮蔽物缓解热应激
面对气候变化,市政当局正试图创建安全舒适的交通系统。在这里,我们确定了树木和不同的遮蔽设计如何影响公交车站的热应力。在2023年夏季的13天里,我们使用传感器测量了树荫下的湿球温度,并将四种不同的遮蔽设计与德克萨斯州休斯顿17个公交车站的无遮蔽区域进行了比较。多层线性混合效应模型的结果显示,树荫区比无树荫区温度低3.2°C(5.8°F) (p <;0.001)。遮蔽物提供的冷却不如树木,封闭的遮蔽物不如开放式设计有效。此外,在无遮蔽的封闭遮蔽下,热应力比遮蔽外的无遮蔽区域高3°C(5.4°F)以上(p <;0.001)。在交通站点植树可能是改善热安全的最佳选择,而避难所如果设计不当,可能是一种不适应的形式,会加大健康风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
9.20%
发文量
314
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution. We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.
期刊最新文献
An explainable prediction framework for electric-taxi charging demand: Evidence from Shanghai, China Climate-induced mobility disruption: Demographic disparities to cumulative heat effect in urban China Uncovering spatiotemporal coupling of electricity outages and food access disruptions during disasters Dynamic social disparities in the U.S. electric vehicle charging infrastructure system Analyzing substitution effects between FCEVs and EVs in South Korea’s zero-emission market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1