Gold nanoparticle enhanced TNFα antibody interface using saliva for predicting prognosis in OSCC

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Archives of oral biology Pub Date : 2025-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2025.106196
K. Hema Shree , R. Gayathri , Vishnu Priya Veeraraghavan , Pratibha Ramani , Ramya Ramadoss , Monal Yuwanati
{"title":"Gold nanoparticle enhanced TNFα antibody interface using saliva for predicting prognosis in OSCC","authors":"K. Hema Shree ,&nbsp;R. Gayathri ,&nbsp;Vishnu Priya Veeraraghavan ,&nbsp;Pratibha Ramani ,&nbsp;Ramya Ramadoss ,&nbsp;Monal Yuwanati","doi":"10.1016/j.archoralbio.2025.106196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To assess the efficacy of the AuNP-enhanced ELISA in the detection of salivary TNF-α in OSCC and evaluate its predictive value for survival.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A longitudinal study was conducted on 40 OSCC patients and 10 healthy controls. Saliva was collected at a regular interval and TNF alpha levels were measured using ELISA and AuNP-enhanced ELISA. Descriptive statistics were carried out for demographic, clinical, and biomarker data. The efficacy of ELISA and AuNP-enhanced ELISA was estimated and compared using the ROC curve. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the survival outcome. A neural network model was performed to estimate TNF-α levels over time in OSCC patients.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>OSCC patients (ELISA is 47.52 ± 20.23 and Gold nano-enhanced ELISA is 57.63 ± 24.99) exhibited significantly elevated TNFα levels compared to controls (ELISA is 10.13 ± 3.07and Gold nano-enhanced ELISA is 12.07 ± 3.66). Gold nano-enhanced ELISA (AUC of 0.995) demonstrated superior sensitivity than ELISA (AUC of 0.986), while Gold nano-enhanced ELISA achieves an even higher in detecting elevated TNFα levels. Kaplan-Meier analysis shows that Gold nano-enhanced ELISA outperforms ELISA in capturing survival trends, with better survival for TNF-α levels above the cutoff at 9 months (70 % vs. 60 %) and 24 months (40 % vs. 0 %). The neural network model poorly predicted TNF- levels over the period (AUC = 0.447).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The gold nano-enhanced TNFα detection method is effective in detecting TNFα levels between OSCC patients and controls, demonstrating superior sensitivity in identifying survival trends over time compared to traditional ELISA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8288,"journal":{"name":"Archives of oral biology","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 106196"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of oral biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000399692500024X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the efficacy of the AuNP-enhanced ELISA in the detection of salivary TNF-α in OSCC and evaluate its predictive value for survival.

Design

A longitudinal study was conducted on 40 OSCC patients and 10 healthy controls. Saliva was collected at a regular interval and TNF alpha levels were measured using ELISA and AuNP-enhanced ELISA. Descriptive statistics were carried out for demographic, clinical, and biomarker data. The efficacy of ELISA and AuNP-enhanced ELISA was estimated and compared using the ROC curve. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the survival outcome. A neural network model was performed to estimate TNF-α levels over time in OSCC patients.

Results

OSCC patients (ELISA is 47.52 ± 20.23 and Gold nano-enhanced ELISA is 57.63 ± 24.99) exhibited significantly elevated TNFα levels compared to controls (ELISA is 10.13 ± 3.07and Gold nano-enhanced ELISA is 12.07 ± 3.66). Gold nano-enhanced ELISA (AUC of 0.995) demonstrated superior sensitivity than ELISA (AUC of 0.986), while Gold nano-enhanced ELISA achieves an even higher in detecting elevated TNFα levels. Kaplan-Meier analysis shows that Gold nano-enhanced ELISA outperforms ELISA in capturing survival trends, with better survival for TNF-α levels above the cutoff at 9 months (70 % vs. 60 %) and 24 months (40 % vs. 0 %). The neural network model poorly predicted TNF- levels over the period (AUC = 0.447).

Conclusions

The gold nano-enhanced TNFα detection method is effective in detecting TNFα levels between OSCC patients and controls, demonstrating superior sensitivity in identifying survival trends over time compared to traditional ELISA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of oral biology
Archives of oral biology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Archives of Oral Biology is an international journal which aims to publish papers of the highest scientific quality in the oral and craniofacial sciences. The journal is particularly interested in research which advances knowledge in the mechanisms of craniofacial development and disease, including: Cell and molecular biology Molecular genetics Immunology Pathogenesis Cellular microbiology Embryology Syndromology Forensic dentistry
期刊最新文献
Exploring the causal relationship between chronic pain and temporomandibular disorders: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study Gold nanoparticle enhanced TNFα antibody interface using saliva for predicting prognosis in OSCC Jiawei Danxuan Koukang and its key component Quercetin intervened in OSF carcinogenesis by inhibiting the AR/eIF5A2 signaling pathway-mediated EMT Nanoencapsulation, biocompatibility and antibiofilm properties of chitosan/nisin Z spheres BPIFA1 inhibits periodontitis by regulating the NF-κB/IκB signaling pathway and macrophage M1/M2 polarization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1