Gabriela Panca Sabatini Dr. med. dent., MSc , Hyung-In Yoon DDS, MSD, PhD , Gülce Çakmak DDS, PhD , Nadin Al-Haj Husain Dr med dent, Habil. , Burak Yilmaz DDS, PhD , Mustafa Borga Dönmez DDS, PhD
{"title":"Mechanical properties and reliability of an additively manufactured resin incorporated with a commercially available ceramic composite concentrate","authors":"Gabriela Panca Sabatini Dr. med. dent., MSc , Hyung-In Yoon DDS, MSD, PhD , Gülce Çakmak DDS, PhD , Nadin Al-Haj Husain Dr med dent, Habil. , Burak Yilmaz DDS, PhD , Mustafa Borga Dönmez DDS, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>A ceramic composite concentrate that can be incorporated into resins used in additive manufacturing to improve their mechanical properties has been recently marketed. However, knowledge on whether this modification enhances the mechanical properties of such resins is lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the mechanical properties and reliability of a dental resin used for additive manufacturing incorporated with a commercially available ceramic composite concentrate.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Specimens for flexural strength (17×4×1.5 mm, n=12), Vickers hardness (Ø10×1.5 mm, n=16), and fracture toughness (25×5×2.2 mm, n=15) tests were additively manufactured from an urethane acrylate-based resin with no fillers intended for definitive use (AM-D), a composite resin with ceramic fillers intended for definitive use (AM-DC), a resin with no fillers intended for interim use (AM-I), and the AM-I resin reinforced with a commercially available ceramic composite concentrate (AM-IR). The AM-IR resin was obtained by mechanically mixing 30 wt% of the ceramic composite concentrate with 70 wt% of the AM-I resin for 3 hours at 50 °C. Flexural strength and Vickers hardness data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests, while 1-way analysis of variance and the Tukey honestly significant difference tests were used for the fracture toughness data. Weibull modulus and characteristic strength were evaluated with the chi-squared test (α=.05).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Resin type affected tested outcomes (<em>P</em><.001). AM-DC and AM-IR had significantly higher flexural strength than the other groups (<em>P</em>≤.004). AM-DC also had the highest Vickers hardness among tested resins (<em>P</em><.001). In terms of fracture toughness, AM-IR had the highest values followed by AM-DC (<em>P</em>≤.010). AM-IR had the highest Weibull modulus, and AM-DC had the highest characteristic strength among tested resins (<em>P</em>≤.019).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The resin modified with the ceramic composite concentrate had similar biaxial flexural strength to that of the composite resin with ceramic fillers intended for definitive use along with the highest Weibull modulus and fracture toughness. However, its Vickers hardness was similar to that of resins indicated for interim use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":"133 4","pages":"Pages 1089.e1-1089.e7"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391325000381","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Statement of problem
A ceramic composite concentrate that can be incorporated into resins used in additive manufacturing to improve their mechanical properties has been recently marketed. However, knowledge on whether this modification enhances the mechanical properties of such resins is lacking.
Purpose
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the mechanical properties and reliability of a dental resin used for additive manufacturing incorporated with a commercially available ceramic composite concentrate.
Material and methods
Specimens for flexural strength (17×4×1.5 mm, n=12), Vickers hardness (Ø10×1.5 mm, n=16), and fracture toughness (25×5×2.2 mm, n=15) tests were additively manufactured from an urethane acrylate-based resin with no fillers intended for definitive use (AM-D), a composite resin with ceramic fillers intended for definitive use (AM-DC), a resin with no fillers intended for interim use (AM-I), and the AM-I resin reinforced with a commercially available ceramic composite concentrate (AM-IR). The AM-IR resin was obtained by mechanically mixing 30 wt% of the ceramic composite concentrate with 70 wt% of the AM-I resin for 3 hours at 50 °C. Flexural strength and Vickers hardness data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests, while 1-way analysis of variance and the Tukey honestly significant difference tests were used for the fracture toughness data. Weibull modulus and characteristic strength were evaluated with the chi-squared test (α=.05).
Results
Resin type affected tested outcomes (P<.001). AM-DC and AM-IR had significantly higher flexural strength than the other groups (P≤.004). AM-DC also had the highest Vickers hardness among tested resins (P<.001). In terms of fracture toughness, AM-IR had the highest values followed by AM-DC (P≤.010). AM-IR had the highest Weibull modulus, and AM-DC had the highest characteristic strength among tested resins (P≤.019).
Conclusions
The resin modified with the ceramic composite concentrate had similar biaxial flexural strength to that of the composite resin with ceramic fillers intended for definitive use along with the highest Weibull modulus and fracture toughness. However, its Vickers hardness was similar to that of resins indicated for interim use.
问题说明:一种陶瓷复合浓缩物,可以加入到用于增材制造的树脂中,以改善其机械性能,最近已经上市。然而,关于这种改性是否能提高这种树脂的机械性能的知识是缺乏的。目的:本体外研究的目的是评估用于增材制造的牙科树脂与市售陶瓷复合浓缩物的机械性能和可靠性。材料和方法:抗弯强度(17×4×1.5 mm, n=12)、维氏硬度(Ø10×1.5 mm, n=16)和断裂韧性(25×5×2.2 mm, n=15)试验的试样是由一种不含最终用途填料的聚氨酯丙烯酸酯基树脂(AM-D)、一种含最终用途陶瓷填料的复合树脂(AM-DC)、一种不含临时用途填料的树脂(AM-I)和一种用可买到的陶瓷复合浓缩物(AM-IR)增强的AM-I树脂进行增材制造的。将30 wt%的陶瓷复合料与70 wt%的AM-I树脂在50℃下机械混合3小时,得到AM-IR树脂。弯曲强度和维氏硬度数据采用Kruskal-Wallis和Dunn检验,断裂韧性数据采用单向方差分析和Tukey诚实显著性差异检验。Weibull模量和特征强度采用卡方检验(α= 0.05)。结果:树脂类型影响测试结果(p结论:用陶瓷复合料改性的树脂与用陶瓷填料的复合树脂具有相似的双轴抗折强度,具有最高的威布尔模量和断裂韧性。然而,它的维氏硬度与临时使用的树脂相似。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.