Do direct and courtesy prison stigma hinder support for a startup business? A vignette experiment

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Experimental Criminology Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1007/s11292-025-09664-x
Audrey Hickert, Luzi Shi, Olivia Shaw, Shi Yan
{"title":"Do direct and courtesy prison stigma hinder support for a startup business? A vignette experiment","authors":"Audrey Hickert, Luzi Shi, Olivia Shaw, Shi Yan","doi":"10.1007/s11292-025-09664-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>Test whether support for a small business is lower when started by prisoners or mothers of prisoners compared to local residents or people who identify as LGBTQ.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We conducted a vignette experiment using a hypothetical social media post for a new business followed by closed- and open-ended questions using a national YouGov sample (<i>N</i> = 1300).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Support for the business is lower when founded by mothers of prisoners than former prisoners (or “local residents”), but lowest when founded by people who identify as LGBTQ. Open-ended responses suggest a lack of awareness of collateral consequences for families of people in prison. Explanations consistent with courtesy stigma were also present.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Given the public’s growing awareness of the benefits of successful reintegration and their willingness to support second chances, more education on the collateral harms of mass incarceration on families could assist with reinvestment in these communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Criminology","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-025-09664-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Test whether support for a small business is lower when started by prisoners or mothers of prisoners compared to local residents or people who identify as LGBTQ.

Methods

We conducted a vignette experiment using a hypothetical social media post for a new business followed by closed- and open-ended questions using a national YouGov sample (N = 1300).

Results

Support for the business is lower when founded by mothers of prisoners than former prisoners (or “local residents”), but lowest when founded by people who identify as LGBTQ. Open-ended responses suggest a lack of awareness of collateral consequences for families of people in prison. Explanations consistent with courtesy stigma were also present.

Conclusions

Given the public’s growing awareness of the benefits of successful reintegration and their willingness to support second chances, more education on the collateral harms of mass incarceration on families could assist with reinvestment in these communities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
直接和礼貌的监狱耻辱会阻碍对初创企业的支持吗?小插曲实验
目的:与当地居民或LGBTQ人群相比,由囚犯或囚犯的母亲创办的小企业是否得到更低的支持。方法我们在YouGov的全国样本(N = 1300)中进行了一个小实验,使用假设的新业务社交媒体帖子,然后使用封闭式和开放式问题。结果:由囚犯母亲创办的企业的支持率低于前囚犯(或“当地居民”),而由LGBTQ人群创办的企业的支持率最低。开放式答复表明,缺乏对囚犯家属附带后果的认识。与礼貌污名一致的解释也存在。鉴于公众越来越意识到成功重新融入社会的好处,并且他们愿意支持第二次机会,更多关于大规模监禁对家庭的附带伤害的教育可以帮助这些社区的再投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Criminology
Journal of Experimental Criminology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Criminology focuses on high quality experimental and quasi-experimental research in the advancement of criminological theory and/or the development of evidence based crime and justice policy. The journal is also committed to the advancement of the science of systematic reviews and experimental methods in criminology and criminal justice. The journal seeks empirical papers on experimental and quasi-experimental studies, systematic reviews on substantive criminological and criminal justice issues, and methodological papers on experimentation and systematic review. The journal encourages submissions from scholars in the broad array of scientific disciplines that are concerned with criminology as well as crime and justice problems.
期刊最新文献
Tablets behind bars: evidence from a staggered adoption difference-in-differences study of prison misconduct Making sense of mixed signals: an experimental analysis of case factors and pretrial decision-making Just say no? Alcohol affects threat perception and reactions to ostracism and sexual objectification A study on the impact of open doors: investigating the influence of short leave and open prison on recidivism rates Concerning, but do we need policy reform? An experimental analysis of public reactions to accurate statistics on deaths caused by police officers and medical professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1