Ariel N. Deutsch, Valentin T. Bickel, David T. Blewett
{"title":"Hollows on Mercury: Global Classification of Degradation States and Insight Into Hollow Evolution","authors":"Ariel N. Deutsch, Valentin T. Bickel, David T. Blewett","doi":"10.1029/2024JE008747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hollows are small, shallow, irregularly shaped landforms, widespread across Mercury, interpreted to have formed via loss of volatiles. Here, we present the first global analysis of hollow degradation states using a new machine learning-derived global catalog. We define three classes, grading from younger/potentially active “Stage 1” (sharp morphology, high visible reflectance) to older/potentially expired “Stage 3” (softened morphology, reflectance similar to that of surroundings). Most analyzed hollows are Stage 1 (<i>N</i> = 1,545 individual hollows), which are more common than Stage 2 (<i>N</i> = 1,111) or Stage 3 (<i>N</i> = 10) hollows near the equator, consistent with the idea that insolation is a primary driver for hollow initiation/growth. Areas where Stage 2 hollows are more common than Stage 1 hollows may indicate regions of relative volatile depletion. Stage 3 hollows are rare, suggesting they are systematically missed during image review, or that hollows on Mercury are mostly young, have been recently reactivated, or are quickly erased once they become inactive. Temperature may limit hollow growth, given that only small hollows are identified in the coldest terrains. There is no meaningful difference in the distribution of hollow sizes between stages, suggesting that their morphological and reflectance properties are not substantially muted until they are fully grown. Stage 1 hollows are more commonly found on steeper slopes than nearby Stage 2 hollows, suggesting that slopes may be an important control on how long hollows remain active. Our hollow classifications are openly available and can help to inform global-scale studies of hollow evolution, and upcoming targeting efforts by the ESA/JAXA BepiColombo mission.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JE008747","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008747","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Hollows are small, shallow, irregularly shaped landforms, widespread across Mercury, interpreted to have formed via loss of volatiles. Here, we present the first global analysis of hollow degradation states using a new machine learning-derived global catalog. We define three classes, grading from younger/potentially active “Stage 1” (sharp morphology, high visible reflectance) to older/potentially expired “Stage 3” (softened morphology, reflectance similar to that of surroundings). Most analyzed hollows are Stage 1 (N = 1,545 individual hollows), which are more common than Stage 2 (N = 1,111) or Stage 3 (N = 10) hollows near the equator, consistent with the idea that insolation is a primary driver for hollow initiation/growth. Areas where Stage 2 hollows are more common than Stage 1 hollows may indicate regions of relative volatile depletion. Stage 3 hollows are rare, suggesting they are systematically missed during image review, or that hollows on Mercury are mostly young, have been recently reactivated, or are quickly erased once they become inactive. Temperature may limit hollow growth, given that only small hollows are identified in the coldest terrains. There is no meaningful difference in the distribution of hollow sizes between stages, suggesting that their morphological and reflectance properties are not substantially muted until they are fully grown. Stage 1 hollows are more commonly found on steeper slopes than nearby Stage 2 hollows, suggesting that slopes may be an important control on how long hollows remain active. Our hollow classifications are openly available and can help to inform global-scale studies of hollow evolution, and upcoming targeting efforts by the ESA/JAXA BepiColombo mission.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.