The effect of resistance training on blood pressure and resting heart rate in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IF 7.4 3区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes research and clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-14 DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112016
Ruihao Lin , Kairan Yang , Hengtao Guo, Xiang Zhang
{"title":"The effect of resistance training on blood pressure and resting heart rate in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Ruihao Lin ,&nbsp;Kairan Yang ,&nbsp;Hengtao Guo,&nbsp;Xiang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This <em>meta</em>-analysis assessed the impacts of resistance training on hemodynamic outcomes, including blood pressure and heart rate, in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Four databases were searched following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing resistance training to usual care were included if they evaluated systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), heart rate, and maximum oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2max</sub>) in adults with T2D. Random-effects models were used to calculate mean differences, with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Twenty-six RCTs were included. Resistance training significantly reduced SBP by −4.13 mmHg (95 % CI: −6.40, −1.85; p = 0.0004) and DBP by −2.03 mmHg (95 % CI: −3.69, −0.38; p = 0.02), with greater reductions in interventions lasting over 12 weeks. Resting heart rate decreased by −3.17 bpm (95 % CI: −6.33, −0.01; p = 0.05) and VO<sub>2max</sub> improved by 0.27 ml/kg/min (95 % CI: 0.02, 0.53; p = 0.04). Meta-regression revealed that intervention duration, session frequency, and study quality did not significantly explain the observed heterogeneity. Resistance training effectively improves hemodynamic outcomes T2D patients, but high heterogeneity in blood pressure outcomes and limited subgroup data on specific subgroups (e.g., women) restrict generalizability. Further research should explore heterogeneity sources and optimize resistance training protocols.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 112016"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822725000300","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This meta-analysis assessed the impacts of resistance training on hemodynamic outcomes, including blood pressure and heart rate, in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Four databases were searched following PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing resistance training to usual care were included if they evaluated systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), heart rate, and maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) in adults with T2D. Random-effects models were used to calculate mean differences, with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Twenty-six RCTs were included. Resistance training significantly reduced SBP by −4.13 mmHg (95 % CI: −6.40, −1.85; p = 0.0004) and DBP by −2.03 mmHg (95 % CI: −3.69, −0.38; p = 0.02), with greater reductions in interventions lasting over 12 weeks. Resting heart rate decreased by −3.17 bpm (95 % CI: −6.33, −0.01; p = 0.05) and VO2max improved by 0.27 ml/kg/min (95 % CI: 0.02, 0.53; p = 0.04). Meta-regression revealed that intervention duration, session frequency, and study quality did not significantly explain the observed heterogeneity. Resistance training effectively improves hemodynamic outcomes T2D patients, but high heterogeneity in blood pressure outcomes and limited subgroup data on specific subgroups (e.g., women) restrict generalizability. Further research should explore heterogeneity sources and optimize resistance training protocols.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗阻训练对2型糖尿病患者血压和静息心率的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
这项荟萃分析评估了阻力训练对2型糖尿病(T2D)患者血液动力学结果的影响,包括血压和心率。按照PRISMA指南检索了四个数据库。比较阻力训练与常规护理的随机对照试验(RCTs),如果评估成人T2D患者的收缩压和舒张压(SBP和DBP)、心率和最大摄氧量(VO2max),则纳入其中。使用随机效应模型计算平均差异,相应的95% %置信区间(ci)。纳入26项随机对照试验。阻力训练显著降低收缩压-4.13 mmHg(95 % CI: -6.40, -1.85; = 0.0004页)和菲律宾-2.03 毫米汞柱(95 % CI: -3.69, -0.38;P = 0.02),干预持续时间超过12 周,降低幅度更大。静息心率降低-3.17 bpm(95 % CI: -6.33, -0.01;p = 0.05),VO2max提高0.27 ml/kg/min(95 % CI: 0.02, 0.53; = 0.04页)。meta回归显示,干预时间、治疗频率和研究质量不能显著解释观察到的异质性。阻力训练有效地改善了T2D患者的血流动力学结果,但血压结果的高度异质性和特定亚组(如女性)的有限亚组数据限制了推广。进一步的研究应探索异质性来源并优化阻力训练方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes research and clinical practice
Diabetes research and clinical practice 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
862
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.
期刊最新文献
Disparities in GLP-1 and GIP responses to small intestinal glucose infusion in individuals with well- and poorly-controlled type 2 diabetes Epidemiology of coeliac disease in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a 13-year population-based study using secondary data sources Serum glycolipids mediate the link between dietary antioxidants and mortality in metabolic syndrome Meeting time in range and time below range targets is not associated with psychological outcomes in type 1 or insulin-treated type 2 diabetes in the Hypo-METRICS study Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and the risk of incident chronic kidney disease: A 10-year prospective cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1