Effects of pay-for-performance for primary care physicians on type 2 diabetes outcomes: Evidence from rural China

IF 6.1 3区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes research and clinical practice Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112046
Miaomiao Zhao , Wenjie Qu , Zhixin An , Hui Jin , Yarong Han , Xin Cao , Qunhong Wu , Yuexia Gao
{"title":"Effects of pay-for-performance for primary care physicians on type 2 diabetes outcomes: Evidence from rural China","authors":"Miaomiao Zhao ,&nbsp;Wenjie Qu ,&nbsp;Zhixin An ,&nbsp;Hui Jin ,&nbsp;Yarong Han ,&nbsp;Xin Cao ,&nbsp;Qunhong Wu ,&nbsp;Yuexia Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study aims to evaluate the impact of a pay-for-performance (P4P) program on health outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Chinese primary care settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Conducted from February to March 2019, this trial involved 1,085 participants from 19 rural villages in China. Family physicians in the intervention group received P4P incentives. We collected clinical health outcomes, including fasting blood glucose, blood pressure, and lipid levels, at baseline and after one year. A differences-in-differences model was employed to assess the P4P program’s effects on these health outcomes. Additionally, a multiple regression analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of P4P on patients’ health behaviors, such as self-management, doctor-patient trust, and self-rated health.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Following the intervention, the intervention group showed significant reductions in fasting plasma glucose (0.88 mmol/L), systolic blood pressure (11.10 mmHg), and total cholesterol (0.50 mmol/L) compared to the control group. The P4P program also improved control rates for fasting glucose (OR = 2.34, 95 % CI:1.57–3.48), blood pressure (OR = 7.57, 95 % CI: 4.98–11.50), and total cholesterol (OR = 2.47, 95 % CI:1.61–3.79), while enhancing self-management behaviors (OR = 0.21, 95 % CI: 0.08–0.34) and doctor-patient trust (OR = 0.75, 95 % CI: 0.39–1.11).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The P4P incentive effectively improved glycemic control and diabetes management in rural China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11249,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 112046"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes research and clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168822725000609","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study aims to evaluate the impact of a pay-for-performance (P4P) program on health outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Chinese primary care settings.

Methods

Conducted from February to March 2019, this trial involved 1,085 participants from 19 rural villages in China. Family physicians in the intervention group received P4P incentives. We collected clinical health outcomes, including fasting blood glucose, blood pressure, and lipid levels, at baseline and after one year. A differences-in-differences model was employed to assess the P4P program’s effects on these health outcomes. Additionally, a multiple regression analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of P4P on patients’ health behaviors, such as self-management, doctor-patient trust, and self-rated health.

Results

Following the intervention, the intervention group showed significant reductions in fasting plasma glucose (0.88 mmol/L), systolic blood pressure (11.10 mmHg), and total cholesterol (0.50 mmol/L) compared to the control group. The P4P program also improved control rates for fasting glucose (OR = 2.34, 95 % CI:1.57–3.48), blood pressure (OR = 7.57, 95 % CI: 4.98–11.50), and total cholesterol (OR = 2.47, 95 % CI:1.61–3.79), while enhancing self-management behaviors (OR = 0.21, 95 % CI: 0.08–0.34) and doctor-patient trust (OR = 0.75, 95 % CI: 0.39–1.11).

Conclusions

The P4P incentive effectively improved glycemic control and diabetes management in rural China.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes research and clinical practice
Diabetes research and clinical practice 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
862
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice is an international journal for health-care providers and clinically oriented researchers that publishes high-quality original research articles and expert reviews in diabetes and related areas. The role of the journal is to provide a venue for dissemination of knowledge and discussion of topics related to diabetes clinical research and patient care. Topics of focus include translational science, genetics, immunology, nutrition, psychosocial research, epidemiology, prevention, socio-economic research, complications, new treatments, technologies and therapy.
期刊最新文献
A critical review on SGLT2 inhibitors for diabetes mellitus, renal health, and cardiovascular conditions Effects of pay-for-performance for primary care physicians on type 2 diabetes outcomes: Evidence from rural China Time in tight glucose range in adolescents and young adults with diabetes during Ramadan intermittent fasting: Data from real-world users on different treatment strategies Increased risk of dementia in Type 1 diabetes: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Non-Pharmacological management strategies for type 2 diabetes in children and young adults: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1