Liedewij Bogaert, Tinne Thys, Peter Van Wambeke, Lotte Janssens, Thijs Willem Swinnen, Lieven Moke, Sebastiaan Schelfaut, Joost Dejaegher, Sieglinde Bogaert, Koen Peers, Ann Spriet, Wim Dankaerts, Simon Brumagne, Bart Depreitere
{"title":"A pre-, peri- and postoperative rehabilitation pathway for lumbar fusion surgery (REACT): a nonrandomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Liedewij Bogaert, Tinne Thys, Peter Van Wambeke, Lotte Janssens, Thijs Willem Swinnen, Lieven Moke, Sebastiaan Schelfaut, Joost Dejaegher, Sieglinde Bogaert, Koen Peers, Ann Spriet, Wim Dankaerts, Simon Brumagne, Bart Depreitere","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08706-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of an evidence-based pre-, peri- and postoperative rehabilitation pathway (i.e. the REACT rehabilitation pathway) on disability in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery (LFS), compared to usual care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, nonrandomized controlled trial included 72 patients scheduled for one- or two-level LFS for degenerative conditions or adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. Participants were allocated to usual care (N = 36) or the REACT rehabilitation pathway (N = 36). The REACT rehabilitation pathway includes prehabilitation, early mobilization and avoidance of unsubstantiated postoperative restrictions, early postoperative physiotherapy, patient empowerment, case manager guidance, and support towards an early return to activity. The primary outcome was disability; key secondary outcomes were back and leg pain intensity, and return-to-work rate. Additional secondary outcomes included fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, negative emotional states, sit-to-stand performance, analgesic use, length of stay, and adverse events. Data were collected preoperatively and at five time points up to one year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants in the REACT group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in disability (p = 0.003), back pain intensity (p = 0.007), and return-to-work rates (88% vs 56%, p = 0.34) compared to the control group. The REACT group also showed greater improvements in fear of movement (p = 0.038), pain catastrophizing (p < 0.001), combined negative emotional states (p = 0.007), sit-to-stand performance (p = 0.021), and reduced analgesic use (p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed in leg pain intensity (p = 0.042), length of hospital stay (p = 0.095) or adverse events (p = 1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The REACT rehabilitation pathway significantly reduced disability in the first postoperative year after LFS compared to usual care. The most promising result is the significantly higher return-to-work rate in the REACT group.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08706-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of an evidence-based pre-, peri- and postoperative rehabilitation pathway (i.e. the REACT rehabilitation pathway) on disability in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery (LFS), compared to usual care.
Methods: A prospective, nonrandomized controlled trial included 72 patients scheduled for one- or two-level LFS for degenerative conditions or adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. Participants were allocated to usual care (N = 36) or the REACT rehabilitation pathway (N = 36). The REACT rehabilitation pathway includes prehabilitation, early mobilization and avoidance of unsubstantiated postoperative restrictions, early postoperative physiotherapy, patient empowerment, case manager guidance, and support towards an early return to activity. The primary outcome was disability; key secondary outcomes were back and leg pain intensity, and return-to-work rate. Additional secondary outcomes included fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, negative emotional states, sit-to-stand performance, analgesic use, length of stay, and adverse events. Data were collected preoperatively and at five time points up to one year postoperatively.
Results: Participants in the REACT group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in disability (p = 0.003), back pain intensity (p = 0.007), and return-to-work rates (88% vs 56%, p = 0.34) compared to the control group. The REACT group also showed greater improvements in fear of movement (p = 0.038), pain catastrophizing (p < 0.001), combined negative emotional states (p = 0.007), sit-to-stand performance (p = 0.021), and reduced analgesic use (p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed in leg pain intensity (p = 0.042), length of hospital stay (p = 0.095) or adverse events (p = 1.00).
Conclusion: The REACT rehabilitation pathway significantly reduced disability in the first postoperative year after LFS compared to usual care. The most promising result is the significantly higher return-to-work rate in the REACT group.
期刊介绍:
"European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts.
Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe