A pre-, peri- and postoperative rehabilitation pathway for lumbar fusion surgery (REACT): a nonrandomized controlled clinical trial.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1007/s00586-025-08706-2
Liedewij Bogaert, Tinne Thys, Peter Van Wambeke, Lotte Janssens, Thijs Willem Swinnen, Lieven Moke, Sebastiaan Schelfaut, Joost Dejaegher, Sieglinde Bogaert, Koen Peers, Ann Spriet, Wim Dankaerts, Simon Brumagne, Bart Depreitere
{"title":"A pre-, peri- and postoperative rehabilitation pathway for lumbar fusion surgery (REACT): a nonrandomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Liedewij Bogaert, Tinne Thys, Peter Van Wambeke, Lotte Janssens, Thijs Willem Swinnen, Lieven Moke, Sebastiaan Schelfaut, Joost Dejaegher, Sieglinde Bogaert, Koen Peers, Ann Spriet, Wim Dankaerts, Simon Brumagne, Bart Depreitere","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-08706-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of an evidence-based pre-, peri- and postoperative rehabilitation pathway (i.e. the REACT rehabilitation pathway) on disability in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery (LFS), compared to usual care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, nonrandomized controlled trial included 72 patients scheduled for one- or two-level LFS for degenerative conditions or adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. Participants were allocated to usual care (N = 36) or the REACT rehabilitation pathway (N = 36). The REACT rehabilitation pathway includes prehabilitation, early mobilization and avoidance of unsubstantiated postoperative restrictions, early postoperative physiotherapy, patient empowerment, case manager guidance, and support towards an early return to activity. The primary outcome was disability; key secondary outcomes were back and leg pain intensity, and return-to-work rate. Additional secondary outcomes included fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, negative emotional states, sit-to-stand performance, analgesic use, length of stay, and adverse events. Data were collected preoperatively and at five time points up to one year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants in the REACT group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in disability (p = 0.003), back pain intensity (p = 0.007), and return-to-work rates (88% vs 56%, p = 0.34) compared to the control group. The REACT group also showed greater improvements in fear of movement (p = 0.038), pain catastrophizing (p < 0.001), combined negative emotional states (p = 0.007), sit-to-stand performance (p = 0.021), and reduced analgesic use (p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed in leg pain intensity (p = 0.042), length of hospital stay (p = 0.095) or adverse events (p = 1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The REACT rehabilitation pathway significantly reduced disability in the first postoperative year after LFS compared to usual care. The most promising result is the significantly higher return-to-work rate in the REACT group.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1513-1527"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08706-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of an evidence-based pre-, peri- and postoperative rehabilitation pathway (i.e. the REACT rehabilitation pathway) on disability in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery (LFS), compared to usual care.

Methods: A prospective, nonrandomized controlled trial included 72 patients scheduled for one- or two-level LFS for degenerative conditions or adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. Participants were allocated to usual care (N = 36) or the REACT rehabilitation pathway (N = 36). The REACT rehabilitation pathway includes prehabilitation, early mobilization and avoidance of unsubstantiated postoperative restrictions, early postoperative physiotherapy, patient empowerment, case manager guidance, and support towards an early return to activity. The primary outcome was disability; key secondary outcomes were back and leg pain intensity, and return-to-work rate. Additional secondary outcomes included fear of movement, pain catastrophizing, negative emotional states, sit-to-stand performance, analgesic use, length of stay, and adverse events. Data were collected preoperatively and at five time points up to one year postoperatively.

Results: Participants in the REACT group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in disability (p = 0.003), back pain intensity (p = 0.007), and return-to-work rates (88% vs 56%, p = 0.34) compared to the control group. The REACT group also showed greater improvements in fear of movement (p = 0.038), pain catastrophizing (p < 0.001), combined negative emotional states (p = 0.007), sit-to-stand performance (p = 0.021), and reduced analgesic use (p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed in leg pain intensity (p = 0.042), length of hospital stay (p = 0.095) or adverse events (p = 1.00).

Conclusion: The REACT rehabilitation pathway significantly reduced disability in the first postoperative year after LFS compared to usual care. The most promising result is the significantly higher return-to-work rate in the REACT group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腰椎融合术术前、围手术期和术后康复途径(REACT):一项非随机对照临床试验。
目的:评估基于证据的术前、围期和术后康复途径(即REACT康复途径)与常规护理相比,对腰椎融合手术(LFS)患者残疾的治疗效果。方法:一项前瞻性,非随机对照试验包括72例因退行性疾病或成人峡部滑脱而计划进行一级或二级LFS的患者。参与者被分配到常规护理(N = 36)或REACT康复途径(N = 36)。REACT康复途径包括预康复、早期活动和避免未经证实的术后限制、早期术后物理治疗、患者授权、病例管理人员指导和支持早期恢复活动。主要结局是残疾;主要的次要结局是背部和腿部疼痛强度,以及恢复工作率。其他次要结局包括运动恐惧、疼痛灾难、消极情绪状态、坐立表现、止痛药使用、住院时间和不良事件。在术前和术后1年的5个时间点收集数据。结果:与对照组相比,REACT组的参与者在残疾(p = 0.003),背部疼痛强度(p = 0.007)和重返工作率(88%对56%,p = 0.34)方面表现出更大的改善。REACT组在运动恐惧(p = 0.038)、疼痛灾难化(p)方面也有更大的改善。结论:与常规护理相比,REACT康复途径显著减少了LFS术后第一年的残疾。最有希望的结果是REACT组的复工率明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
期刊最新文献
Is preoperative cervical range of motion associated with cage subsidence after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? The impact of preoperative lordosis distribution index on postoperative sagittal alignment and outcomes after lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative spine disease. The HBA-3 score: a simple bedside tool to predict cage subsidence after TLIF. Proximal Facet Joint Violations in Augmented Reality-Guided versus Freehand Pedicle Screw Placement in the Lumbosacral Spine. Contemporary spine research productivity: a bibliometric analysis of 28 orthopedic and neurosurgical journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1