Evaluating an online stroke training programme for Saudi Arabian physiotherapists for improving their knowledge and confidence in long-term stroke care: a pilot mixed-methods study.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-06837-0
Basema Temehy, Andrew Soundy, Sheeba Rosewilliam
{"title":"Evaluating an online stroke training programme for Saudi Arabian physiotherapists for improving their knowledge and confidence in long-term stroke care: a pilot mixed-methods study.","authors":"Basema Temehy, Andrew Soundy, Sheeba Rosewilliam","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06837-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke is currently the second leading cause of death in Saudi Arabia (SA), with an annual incidence rate of 29 per 100,000 people. There is a huge demand for rehabilitation services for people who have had a stroke living in the community; however, the services in SA do not meet this need due to a lack of community rehabilitation services. Additionally, rehabilitation staff have reported a lack of knowledge and skills to deliver rehabilitation services for people post-stroke in the community. A first step towards developing these services is to train professionals working in this area to deliver community-based rehabilitation for patients with stroke. This is the first study to evaluate an online stroke training programme (STP) for physiotherapists in SA to enhance stroke care and enable them to deliver long-term care following the discharge of stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A sequential mixed methods design was adopted with three measurements undertaken pre-training, post-training questionnaires and one-month follow-up interviews. Participants were eligible if they were physiotherapists of any gender who were currently providing therapy to stroke patients and working in SA. The STP consisted of four modules and was delivered via an online platform. Questionnaires developed for this study were key outcome measures used to measure the change in the participants' knowledge, confidence and attitude. Chi-Square test and Wilcoxon test were used to compare pre- and post-training results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six physiotherapists completed the STP. The results demonstrated a statistically significant increase (P < 0.05) in the participants' knowledge and confidence in providing long-term care for patients with stroke. Additionally, the STP had a positive impact on the participants' attitudes. Qualitative interviews post-training suggested that participants' experiences of STP were positive. However, the training had limitations such as the lack of practical content and a short duration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The STP was seen to be acceptable and found to improve participants' knowledge and confidence in delivering long-term care for patients with stroke in this study. Future research should focus on evaluating impact of training in improvements in service delivery by physiotherapists.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"249"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06837-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke is currently the second leading cause of death in Saudi Arabia (SA), with an annual incidence rate of 29 per 100,000 people. There is a huge demand for rehabilitation services for people who have had a stroke living in the community; however, the services in SA do not meet this need due to a lack of community rehabilitation services. Additionally, rehabilitation staff have reported a lack of knowledge and skills to deliver rehabilitation services for people post-stroke in the community. A first step towards developing these services is to train professionals working in this area to deliver community-based rehabilitation for patients with stroke. This is the first study to evaluate an online stroke training programme (STP) for physiotherapists in SA to enhance stroke care and enable them to deliver long-term care following the discharge of stroke patients.

Methods: A sequential mixed methods design was adopted with three measurements undertaken pre-training, post-training questionnaires and one-month follow-up interviews. Participants were eligible if they were physiotherapists of any gender who were currently providing therapy to stroke patients and working in SA. The STP consisted of four modules and was delivered via an online platform. Questionnaires developed for this study were key outcome measures used to measure the change in the participants' knowledge, confidence and attitude. Chi-Square test and Wilcoxon test were used to compare pre- and post-training results.

Results: Twenty-six physiotherapists completed the STP. The results demonstrated a statistically significant increase (P < 0.05) in the participants' knowledge and confidence in providing long-term care for patients with stroke. Additionally, the STP had a positive impact on the participants' attitudes. Qualitative interviews post-training suggested that participants' experiences of STP were positive. However, the training had limitations such as the lack of practical content and a short duration.

Conclusion: The STP was seen to be acceptable and found to improve participants' knowledge and confidence in delivering long-term care for patients with stroke in this study. Future research should focus on evaluating impact of training in improvements in service delivery by physiotherapists.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估沙特阿拉伯物理治疗师在线卒中培训计划,以提高他们对长期卒中护理的知识和信心:一项混合方法的试点研究。
背景:中风目前是沙特阿拉伯(SA)的第二大死因,年发病率为每10万人中有29人。居住在社区的中风患者对康复服务的需求很大;然而,由于缺乏社区康复服务,南澳大利亚州的服务不能满足这一需求。此外,据报告,康复人员缺乏为社区中风后患者提供康复服务的知识和技能。发展这些服务的第一步是培训在这一领域工作的专业人员,为中风患者提供社区康复服务。这是第一个评估在线卒中培训计划(STP)的研究,该计划旨在为南非的物理治疗师提供卒中护理,并使他们能够在卒中患者出院后提供长期护理。方法:采用序贯混合方法设计,在训练前、训练后分别进行问卷调查和1个月的随访。如果参与者是目前为中风患者提供治疗并在SA工作的任何性别的物理治疗师,则符合条件。STP由四个模块组成,通过在线平台交付。为本研究开发的问卷是衡量参与者知识、信心和态度变化的关键结果指标。采用卡方检验和Wilcoxon检验比较训练前后的结果。结果:26名物理治疗师完成了STP。结论:STP被认为是可以接受的,并且在本研究中发现STP可以提高参与者对卒中患者提供长期护理的知识和信心。未来的研究应侧重于评估培训对物理治疗师改善服务提供的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
Implementation strategies of team-based learning in undergraduate medical curricula: a scoping review. Soft skills during residency in Spain: an analysis of the specialized training programmes. Operationalising readiness for practice in final OSCEs: insights from a mixed-methods study across five Australian medical schools. Contemporary endodontic practices among endodontic specialists in Saudi Arabia: a comparative cross-sectional study. Confounding by gender and academic year masks null effects of a Cooperative Training Community framework on undergraduate research outcomes: a mixed-methods study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1