Mengying Liu, S. Patrick Mooleki, Yunliang Li, Dave Schneider, Leon V. Kochian, Bobbi L. Helgason
{"title":"Phosphorus fertilizer responsive bacteria and fungi in canola (Brassica napus L.) roots are correlated with plant performance","authors":"Mengying Liu, S. Patrick Mooleki, Yunliang Li, Dave Schneider, Leon V. Kochian, Bobbi L. Helgason","doi":"10.1007/s11104-025-07286-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Canola (<i>Brassica napus</i> L.) has high phosphorus demand, but its seedlings are sensitive to seed-placed phosphorus fertilizers. Optimizing phosphorus fertilizer management for canola is critical and can benefit from insights into the root-associated microbiota, which enhances phosphorus availability through mineralization and solubilization.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We conducted a two-year field experiment applying monoammonium phosphate fertilizer at three rates (no addition, recommended rate, and high rate at 0, 17, and 32 kg P ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) using two opener placements (narrow at 2.5 cm vs. wide at 10 cm). Canola performance was evaluated, and rhizosphere and root bacterial and fungal microbiota was profiled by DNA amplicon sequencing.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>High-rate and near-seed placement of phosphorus (32 kg P ha<sup>−1</sup> in the 2.5 cm opener) reduced canola seedling emergence but not biomass or yield, which were higher in 2020 than in 2019. Yearly variations and plant growth stages impacted the rhizosphere and root microbiota, while phosphorus fertilization only affected the root microbiota. Phosphorus fertilization enriched <i>Burkholderia-Caballeronia-Paraburkholderia</i>, <i>Luteibacter</i>, <i>Amaurodon</i>, <i>Trichoderma</i>, and <i>Penicillium</i> in roots, Conversely, <i>Chryseobacterium</i>, <i>Chitinophaga</i>, <i>Flavobacterium</i> and <i>Olpidium</i> were more prevalent in roots without phosphorus addition. Yield positively correlated with the relative abundance of <i>Burkholderia-Caballeronia-Paraburkholderia</i> and <i>Trichoderma</i> in roots.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Phosphate fertilizer rates and placements affected canola germination but not yield. Profiling of phosphorus-responsive root microbes suggests that phosphate fertilizer rate and placement at seeding can have a lasting impact on the canola root microbiota as the plant matures, modulating plant growth responses to soil phosphorus availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07286-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Canola (Brassica napus L.) has high phosphorus demand, but its seedlings are sensitive to seed-placed phosphorus fertilizers. Optimizing phosphorus fertilizer management for canola is critical and can benefit from insights into the root-associated microbiota, which enhances phosphorus availability through mineralization and solubilization.
Methods
We conducted a two-year field experiment applying monoammonium phosphate fertilizer at three rates (no addition, recommended rate, and high rate at 0, 17, and 32 kg P ha−1 year−1) using two opener placements (narrow at 2.5 cm vs. wide at 10 cm). Canola performance was evaluated, and rhizosphere and root bacterial and fungal microbiota was profiled by DNA amplicon sequencing.
Results
High-rate and near-seed placement of phosphorus (32 kg P ha−1 in the 2.5 cm opener) reduced canola seedling emergence but not biomass or yield, which were higher in 2020 than in 2019. Yearly variations and plant growth stages impacted the rhizosphere and root microbiota, while phosphorus fertilization only affected the root microbiota. Phosphorus fertilization enriched Burkholderia-Caballeronia-Paraburkholderia, Luteibacter, Amaurodon, Trichoderma, and Penicillium in roots, Conversely, Chryseobacterium, Chitinophaga, Flavobacterium and Olpidium were more prevalent in roots without phosphorus addition. Yield positively correlated with the relative abundance of Burkholderia-Caballeronia-Paraburkholderia and Trichoderma in roots.
Conclusions
Phosphate fertilizer rates and placements affected canola germination but not yield. Profiling of phosphorus-responsive root microbes suggests that phosphate fertilizer rate and placement at seeding can have a lasting impact on the canola root microbiota as the plant matures, modulating plant growth responses to soil phosphorus availability.
油菜(Brassica napus L.)对磷的需求量很大,但其幼苗对施磷肥非常敏感。优化油菜籽的磷肥管理是至关重要的,并且可以从对根部相关微生物群的了解中受益,这些微生物群通过矿化和溶解来提高磷的有效性。方法我们进行了为期两年的田间试验,采用两个开瓶位置(窄距2.5 cm和宽距10 cm),以三种速率(无添加、推荐施用和高施用0、17和32 kg P / h−1年−1)施用磷铵肥。通过DNA扩增子测序对油菜的根际和根际细菌和真菌菌群进行了分析。结果高施磷肥和近种施磷肥(2.5 cm开孔处32 kg P / h- 1)降低了油菜出苗率,但没有降低生物量和产量,2020年油菜出苗率高于2019年。年际变化和植物生长阶段影响根际和根微生物群,而磷肥只影响根微生物群。施磷可使根内Burkholderia-Caballeronia-Paraburkholderia、Luteibacter、Amaurodon、Trichoderma和Penicillium富集,而不施磷的根内则以chryseobacteria、Chitinophaga、Flavobacterium和Olpidium富集。产量与根系中伯克氏菌-卡瓦卢氏菌-副伯克氏菌和木霉的相对丰度呈正相关。结论施磷肥量和施磷肥位置影响油菜发芽,但不影响产量。对磷敏感的根系微生物的分析表明,随着植物的成熟,磷肥的施用量和播种量会对油菜根系微生物群产生持久的影响,从而调节植物对土壤磷有效性的生长反应。
期刊介绍:
Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.