Blaming “illegal aliens” for crisis?: Cultural worldview defenses in effects of death and economic threats on anti-undocumented immigrant attitudes

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL International Journal of Intercultural Relations Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102150
Yi Feng Wang , Xinyi Zhang , Yuwei Zhong
{"title":"Blaming “illegal aliens” for crisis?: Cultural worldview defenses in effects of death and economic threats on anti-undocumented immigrant attitudes","authors":"Yi Feng Wang ,&nbsp;Xinyi Zhang ,&nbsp;Yuwei Zhong","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2025.102150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A stark trend since the COVID-19 pandemic is that many people have expressed more hostility toward outgroups, including undocumented immigrants. Aiming to understand the root causes of this tendency, we brought together two traditions in the threat literature: (1) research on terror management theory that emphasizes outgroup antagonism as a downstream effect of mortality salience and (2) the line of studies based on group threat theory that highlights the influence of general economic conditions on intergroup relations. We explored whether the explanatory mechanism of cultural worldview defenses, posited by terror management theory, could similarly account for economic influences on intergroup relations. Through an online experiment, we found that participants (American citizens, <em>N</em> = 297) exposed to a death or economic threat had higher levels of anti-undocumented immigrant attitudes than the control group (without a threat). An increased tendency toward individualistic value explained the effects of death and economic threats on the outcome variable. Analytic thinking, a culturally prescribed cognitive style, did not mediate the threat-to-attitude relationships, but both threats influenced it in different ways. Therefore, we concluded that the theoretical lens of the worldview defense system was related to economic threats.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176725000136","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A stark trend since the COVID-19 pandemic is that many people have expressed more hostility toward outgroups, including undocumented immigrants. Aiming to understand the root causes of this tendency, we brought together two traditions in the threat literature: (1) research on terror management theory that emphasizes outgroup antagonism as a downstream effect of mortality salience and (2) the line of studies based on group threat theory that highlights the influence of general economic conditions on intergroup relations. We explored whether the explanatory mechanism of cultural worldview defenses, posited by terror management theory, could similarly account for economic influences on intergroup relations. Through an online experiment, we found that participants (American citizens, N = 297) exposed to a death or economic threat had higher levels of anti-undocumented immigrant attitudes than the control group (without a threat). An increased tendency toward individualistic value explained the effects of death and economic threats on the outcome variable. Analytic thinking, a culturally prescribed cognitive style, did not mediate the threat-to-attitude relationships, but both threats influenced it in different ways. Therefore, we concluded that the theoretical lens of the worldview defense system was related to economic threats.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自 COVID-19 大流行以来,一个明显的趋势是许多人对外部群体(包括无证移民)表达了更多的敌意。为了了解这一趋势的根本原因,我们汇集了威胁论文献中的两个传统:(1)恐怖管理理论的研究,强调外群体对立是死亡率显著性的下游效应;(2)基于群体威胁论的研究,强调总体经济条件对群体间关系的影响。我们探讨了恐怖管理理论提出的文化世界观防御的解释机制能否同样解释经济对群体间关系的影响。通过在线实验,我们发现受到死亡或经济威胁的参与者(美国公民,N = 297)的反无证移民态度高于对照组(无威胁)。个人主义价值观倾向的增加解释了死亡和经济威胁对结果变量的影响。分析性思维作为一种文化规定的认知风格,并没有在威胁与态度的关系中起到中介作用,但这两种威胁以不同的方式对其产生了影响。因此,我们得出结论,世界观防御系统的理论视角与经济威胁有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.
期刊最新文献
Blaming “illegal aliens” for crisis?: Cultural worldview defenses in effects of death and economic threats on anti-undocumented immigrant attitudes Cultural intelligence, acculturation, adaptation and emotional displays of other-condemning emotions and self-conscious emotions among Chinese international students in the UK Exploring experiential learning in short-term study abroad: Insights from Chinese students The double-edged sword of acculturation: Navigating work-family conflict among immigrants Factorial validity and reliability of the 16-item individualism and collectivism scale for measuring cultural orientation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1