The Personal Identity Test: A Measure of Discontinuity in Core Personal Identity.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychological Reports Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1177/00332941251318657
Elizabeth Tryon, Warren W Tryon, Georgiana S Tryon
{"title":"The Personal Identity Test: A Measure of Discontinuity in Core Personal Identity.","authors":"Elizabeth Tryon, Warren W Tryon, Georgiana S Tryon","doi":"10.1177/00332941251318657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Individuals' identity formation is generally understood to occur at multiple levels. Extant research distinguishes two levels of personal identity: (a) an external sense of personal identity that is formed by family, school, and community interactions and (b) a core internal sense of personality identity that is generally understood to be formed during infancy and childhood by caregivers. Fundamental to this core sense of self is that it is continuously experienced as being present. Evidence indicates that trauma and dissociation disrupt the continuous experience of core personal identity resulting in a wide range of psychopathologies including Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) among others. It may also be positively correlated with anxiety, depression, and dependency. A literature search failed to find a psychometrically sound, reliable, and valid, measure of core personal identity let alone a test of discontinuous core personal identity. This article reports efforts to develop and initially validate a highly reliable single factor 37-item (long form) and a 12-item (short form) instrument of discontinuous core personal identity. Both forms correlate significantly and substantially with short measures of Borderline Personality Disorder, interpersonal dependency, generalized anxiety, and depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"332941251318657"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941251318657","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals' identity formation is generally understood to occur at multiple levels. Extant research distinguishes two levels of personal identity: (a) an external sense of personal identity that is formed by family, school, and community interactions and (b) a core internal sense of personality identity that is generally understood to be formed during infancy and childhood by caregivers. Fundamental to this core sense of self is that it is continuously experienced as being present. Evidence indicates that trauma and dissociation disrupt the continuous experience of core personal identity resulting in a wide range of psychopathologies including Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) among others. It may also be positively correlated with anxiety, depression, and dependency. A literature search failed to find a psychometrically sound, reliable, and valid, measure of core personal identity let alone a test of discontinuous core personal identity. This article reports efforts to develop and initially validate a highly reliable single factor 37-item (long form) and a 12-item (short form) instrument of discontinuous core personal identity. Both forms correlate significantly and substantially with short measures of Borderline Personality Disorder, interpersonal dependency, generalized anxiety, and depression.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个人同一性测验:核心个人同一性的不连续性测量。
个体的身份形成通常被理解为发生在多个层面上。现有的研究将个人同一性分为两个层次:(a)由家庭、学校和社区互动形成的外部个人同一性;(b)一般认为由照顾者在婴儿期和儿童期形成的核心内部人格同一性。这种核心自我意识的基础是它被不断地体验为存在。有证据表明,创伤和分离破坏了核心个人身份的持续体验,导致了广泛的精神病理,包括边缘性人格障碍(BPD)和分离性身份障碍(DID)等。它也可能与焦虑、抑郁和依赖呈正相关。文献检索未能找到心理测量学上健全、可靠和有效的核心个人同一性测量方法,更不用说不连续核心个人同一性的测试了。本文报告了开发和初步验证一个高度可靠的单因素37项(长形式)和12项(短形式)的不连续核心个人同一性工具的努力。这两种形式都与边缘型人格障碍、人际依赖、广泛性焦虑和抑郁症的短期测量显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Reports
Psychological Reports PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
171
期刊最新文献
Childhood Maltreatment and Anxiety in Adulthood: Disentangling the Role of Personality Functioning. Gender Comparison of Latent Coping Profiles in a Representative Sample of College Emerging Adults. Women's Decision-Making: A Latent Profile Analysis of Agency, Communion, and Fear of Negative Evaluation. Eating away the Boredom? An Experimental and Ecological Momentary Assessment of State Boredom and Snack Consumption. Psychometric Evidence of the Trichotillomania Dimensional Scale (TTM-D) in Adults From the General Population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1