Effects of Movement and Sedentary Play interventions on executive functioning and their relationships with sensory, repetitive, and negative behaviors of children with ASD - a pilot RCT.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2025.2465600
W C Su, S Srinivasan, A N Bhat
{"title":"Effects of Movement and Sedentary Play interventions on executive functioning and their relationships with sensory, repetitive, and negative behaviors of children with ASD - a pilot RCT.","authors":"W C Su, S Srinivasan, A N Bhat","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2465600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This randomized controlled trial aimed to explore the relationships between inhibitory control and behavioral difficulties of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and examined the intervention effects of Movement versus Sedentary Play interventions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty school-age children with ASD were enrolled and matched based on age and ability (mean age ± SE = 8.6 ± 0.4) then randomly assigned to Movement or Sedentary Play groups. The Movement intervention involved play-based, whole-body movements, while the Sedentary Play intervention focused on fine motor activities. The Flanker task was used to assess inhibitory control during pretest and posttest, and we coded children's sensory, repetitive, and negative behaviors during early and late intervention sessions. Non-parametric statistical analyses were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant correlations between negative behaviors during intervention sessions and inhibitory control during standardized tasks (<i>r</i> = 0.3-0.4; <i>p</i>s < 0.05). Additionally, we observed improvements in inhibitory control (<i>Z</i> = -0.3 to -3.4, <i>p</i>s < 0.01) and reduction in sensory and negative behaviors (<i>Z</i> = -1.7 to -2.1, <i>p</i>s < 0.05) following Movement intervention but not Sedentary Play intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results support using whole-body movement interventions to enhance executive functioning and reduce sensory/repetitive and negative behaviors in children with ASD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"4999-5007"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2465600","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This randomized controlled trial aimed to explore the relationships between inhibitory control and behavioral difficulties of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and examined the intervention effects of Movement versus Sedentary Play interventions.

Materials and methods: Forty school-age children with ASD were enrolled and matched based on age and ability (mean age ± SE = 8.6 ± 0.4) then randomly assigned to Movement or Sedentary Play groups. The Movement intervention involved play-based, whole-body movements, while the Sedentary Play intervention focused on fine motor activities. The Flanker task was used to assess inhibitory control during pretest and posttest, and we coded children's sensory, repetitive, and negative behaviors during early and late intervention sessions. Non-parametric statistical analyses were used.

Results: There were significant correlations between negative behaviors during intervention sessions and inhibitory control during standardized tasks (r = 0.3-0.4; ps < 0.05). Additionally, we observed improvements in inhibitory control (Z = -0.3 to -3.4, ps < 0.01) and reduction in sensory and negative behaviors (Z = -1.7 to -2.1, ps < 0.05) following Movement intervention but not Sedentary Play intervention.

Conclusions: These results support using whole-body movement interventions to enhance executive functioning and reduce sensory/repetitive and negative behaviors in children with ASD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动和久坐游戏干预对ASD儿童执行功能的影响及其与感觉、重复和消极行为的关系——一项试验性随机对照试验
目的:本随机对照试验旨在探讨自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童抑制控制与行为困难的关系,并考察运动与久坐游戏干预的干预效果。材料和方法:选取40名学龄ASD儿童,根据年龄和能力进行匹配(平均年龄±SE = 8.6±0.4),随机分为运动组和久坐游戏组。运动干预包括以游戏为基础的全身运动,而久坐游戏干预则侧重于精细运动活动。在测试前和测试后,我们使用Flanker任务来评估抑制控制,并在干预的早期和后期对儿童的感觉、重复和消极行为进行编码。采用非参数统计分析。结果:干预期消极行为与标准化任务抑制控制存在显著相关(r = 0.3 ~ 0.4;结论:这些结果支持使用全身运动干预来增强ASD儿童的执行功能,减少感觉/重复和消极行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
期刊最新文献
"Fragments that define my shape": a qualitative study of self-identity on social media after an acquired brain injury. Turkish translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric evaluation of the Qualisex questionnaire in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Educational interventions on attitudes and beliefs about low back pain treatment in physical therapy students and physical therapists: a systematic review and meta-analysis. More than a functional match: longitudinal patterns on person-centered assistive technology. Separating disability stigma from health stigma: implications for health and rehabilitation research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1