Feasibility of shear wave elastography to assess upper limb spasticity in patients after brain injury.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2025.2467786
Ganglin Chen, Ling Ren, Zhenguo Wu, Xianrui Hu, Jing He
{"title":"Feasibility of shear wave elastography to assess upper limb spasticity in patients after brain injury.","authors":"Ganglin Chen, Ling Ren, Zhenguo Wu, Xianrui Hu, Jing He","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2467786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the feasibility of Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) for quantifying upper limb spasticity in people after brain injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study included 52 patients with upper limb spasticity after brain injury. Participants underwent a two-week rehabilitation treatment. The modified Ashworth scale (MAS), upper extremity section of the Fugl-Meyer motor scale (FMMS-UE), Barthel index (BI) and SWE were assessed before and after a two-week rehabilitation. The shear modulus was used to evaluate the stiffness of the biceps brachii at the transverse and longitudinal plane of 0°and 90°elbow flexion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study, paretic side shear modulus values were significantly larger than non-paretic sides (all p-values < 0.05), with significant reductions only on the paretic side (all p-values < 0.001) after 2-week rehabilitation treatment. At baseline, MAS and shear modulus had a significant positive correlation. After rehabilitation, only the longitudinal plane shear modulus showed a correlation with MAS. No significant correlations were found between shear modulus and FMMS-UE or BI scores, except for a negative correlation between shear modulus and BI at 0° transverse plane flexion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that SWE effectively quantifies upper limb spasticity and can assess the impact of rehabilitation treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"5133-5141"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2467786","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the feasibility of Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) for quantifying upper limb spasticity in people after brain injury.

Methods: This observational study included 52 patients with upper limb spasticity after brain injury. Participants underwent a two-week rehabilitation treatment. The modified Ashworth scale (MAS), upper extremity section of the Fugl-Meyer motor scale (FMMS-UE), Barthel index (BI) and SWE were assessed before and after a two-week rehabilitation. The shear modulus was used to evaluate the stiffness of the biceps brachii at the transverse and longitudinal plane of 0°and 90°elbow flexion.

Results: In our study, paretic side shear modulus values were significantly larger than non-paretic sides (all p-values < 0.05), with significant reductions only on the paretic side (all p-values < 0.001) after 2-week rehabilitation treatment. At baseline, MAS and shear modulus had a significant positive correlation. After rehabilitation, only the longitudinal plane shear modulus showed a correlation with MAS. No significant correlations were found between shear modulus and FMMS-UE or BI scores, except for a negative correlation between shear modulus and BI at 0° transverse plane flexion.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that SWE effectively quantifies upper limb spasticity and can assess the impact of rehabilitation treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
横波弹性成像评估颅脑损伤后上肢痉挛的可行性。
目的:探讨用横波弹性成像(SWE)量化脑损伤后上肢痉挛的可行性。方法:对52例颅脑损伤后上肢痉挛患者进行观察性研究。参与者接受了为期两周的康复治疗。两周康复前后分别评估改良Ashworth量表(MAS)、Fugl-Meyer上肢部分运动量表(FMMS-UE)、Barthel指数(BI)和SWE。采用剪切模量评估肱二头肌在0°和90°肘关节屈曲时的横向和纵向刚度。结果:在我们的研究中,父母侧剪切模量值明显大于非父母侧(均p值< 0.05),只有父母侧在康复治疗2周后显著降低(均p值< 0.001)。基线时,MAS与剪切模量呈显著正相关。康复后,只有纵面剪切模量与MAS相关。剪切模量与FMMS-UE或BI评分之间无显著相关性,但在0°横向平面弯曲时剪切模量与BI呈负相关。结论:我们的研究结果表明,SWE可以有效地量化上肢痉挛,并可以评估康复治疗的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
期刊最新文献
A mixed methods study exploring factors that impact physiotherapy participation for people with Parkinson's disease. Radical accessibility: co-designing for intersectionality in a peer-led LGBTIQA+ disability digital storytelling project. Homehabilitation - development of a new pathway for management of slow to recover children in an inpatient rehabilitation ward. Laying the foundation for an instrument to assess environmental factors in people with chronic pulmonary diseases: mapping the content of the Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors (CHIEF) to ICF core sets. Evaluating the construct validity of five concern for falling outcome measures and the concern for falling framework in people with lower limb loss using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1