How do medical students make sense of internal and external feedback to enhance their Dutch communication skills?

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-06845-0
Hao Yu, Zhien Li, S Eleonore Köhler, Jeroen J G van Merriënboer, Maryam Asoodar
{"title":"How do medical students make sense of internal and external feedback to enhance their Dutch communication skills?","authors":"Hao Yu, Zhien Li, S Eleonore Köhler, Jeroen J G van Merriënboer, Maryam Asoodar","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06845-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Feedback is crucial in medical education for developing communication skills and fostering comprehensive learning. Despite its importance, medical students often face challenges in effectively leveraging feedback. This study investigates how students perceive and make sense of internal and external feedback in a 2nd language (L2) medical Dutch course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixteen third-year international medical students (mean age = 23) participated in a medical Dutch course that included six structured sessions. Each session encompassed a briefing, simulated patient consultations (SPCs), and a debriefing. The curriculum integrated internal feedback from self-reflections and external feedback from peers, teachers, and simulated patients. Data were gathered through a students' feedback perception survey and semi-structured interviews and analyzed via inductive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey data indicated a trend where the preference, satisfaction, and trust in external feedback were higher than those for internal feedback. However, both types of feedback were regarded as equally effective in facilitating learning progress. Through thematic analysis, we identified five crucial themes that show how students perceive and make sense of various forms of feedback: proactive engagement with feedback, critically analyzing and utilizing the exchange in dialogues and discussions, self-reflection and progress tracking, value from diverse perspectives, and moment-specific and actionable feedback.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study emphasizes the vital roles of internal and external feedback in enhancing medical Dutch communication skills among medical students. Internal feedback encourages self-reflection and growth, essential for complex medical communications, while external feedback provides clear, specific and supportive guidance and experience from teachers, simulated patients and peers. These feedback mechanisms together improve students' skills in medical Dutch communication, leading to better doctor-patient interactions. Future research should focus on adapting these feedback strategies across diverse educational settings to further support the development of medical L2 communication skills in global medical contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"256"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834736/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06845-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Feedback is crucial in medical education for developing communication skills and fostering comprehensive learning. Despite its importance, medical students often face challenges in effectively leveraging feedback. This study investigates how students perceive and make sense of internal and external feedback in a 2nd language (L2) medical Dutch course.

Methods: Sixteen third-year international medical students (mean age = 23) participated in a medical Dutch course that included six structured sessions. Each session encompassed a briefing, simulated patient consultations (SPCs), and a debriefing. The curriculum integrated internal feedback from self-reflections and external feedback from peers, teachers, and simulated patients. Data were gathered through a students' feedback perception survey and semi-structured interviews and analyzed via inductive thematic analysis.

Results: Survey data indicated a trend where the preference, satisfaction, and trust in external feedback were higher than those for internal feedback. However, both types of feedback were regarded as equally effective in facilitating learning progress. Through thematic analysis, we identified five crucial themes that show how students perceive and make sense of various forms of feedback: proactive engagement with feedback, critically analyzing and utilizing the exchange in dialogues and discussions, self-reflection and progress tracking, value from diverse perspectives, and moment-specific and actionable feedback.

Conclusions: This study emphasizes the vital roles of internal and external feedback in enhancing medical Dutch communication skills among medical students. Internal feedback encourages self-reflection and growth, essential for complex medical communications, while external feedback provides clear, specific and supportive guidance and experience from teachers, simulated patients and peers. These feedback mechanisms together improve students' skills in medical Dutch communication, leading to better doctor-patient interactions. Future research should focus on adapting these feedback strategies across diverse educational settings to further support the development of medical L2 communication skills in global medical contexts.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生如何理解内部和外部反馈,以提高他们的荷兰语沟通技巧?
背景:在医学教育中,反馈对于培养沟通技巧和促进全面学习至关重要。尽管反馈很重要,但医学生在有效利用反馈方面往往面临挑战。本研究探讨学生在第二语言医学荷兰语课程中如何感知和理解内部和外部反馈。方法:16名三年级国际医科学生(平均年龄23岁)参加了一门荷兰语医学课程,包括6个结构化课程。每次会议包括简报、模拟病人会诊(spc)和简报。课程整合了来自自我反思的内部反馈和来自同伴、老师和模拟病人的外部反馈。通过学生反馈感知调查和半结构化访谈收集数据,并通过归纳主题分析进行分析。结果:调查数据显示,外部反馈的偏好、满意度和信任度高于内部反馈。然而,两种类型的反馈被认为在促进学习进步方面同样有效。通过主题分析,我们确定了五个关键主题,展示了学生如何感知和理解各种形式的反馈:积极参与反馈,批判性地分析和利用对话和讨论中的交流,自我反思和进度跟踪,来自不同角度的价值,以及特定时刻和可操作的反馈。结论:本研究强调了内部和外部反馈在提高医学生荷兰语沟通技巧中的重要作用。内部反馈鼓励自我反思和成长,这对于复杂的医疗沟通至关重要,而外部反馈提供来自教师、模拟患者和同伴的明确、具体和支持性指导和经验。这些反馈机制共同提高了学生在荷兰语医学交流方面的技能,从而改善了医患互动。未来的研究应侧重于在不同的教育环境中调整这些反馈策略,以进一步支持全球医学背景下医学第二语言沟通技能的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
Abdominal ultrasound performance assessment: a comparison of generic and extended OSCE rating scales. Correction: The potential of uncertainty tolerance measures to identify specific needs of first-year medical residents: an exploratory study. Development, implementation, and evaluation of the Student Optimized Learning Environment (SOLE): a longitudinal team-based communication skills curriculum for medical students. Simulation training for invasive cardiovascular procedures: the Heart-SIMS-1 randomized trial. Potential factors influencing the academic performance of pharmacy undergraduates: a cross-sectional survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1