Reduced-energy diet in women with gestational diabetes: the dietary intervention in gestational diabetes DiGest randomized clinical trial

IF 58.7 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Nature Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1038/s41591-024-03356-1
Laura C. Kusinski, Danielle Jones, Nooria Atta, Elizabeth Turner, Suzanne Smith, Linda M. Oude Griep, Kirsten Rennie, Emanuella De Lucia Rolfe, Stephen J. Sharp, Vern Farewell, Helen R. Murphy, Roy Taylor, Claire L. Meek
{"title":"Reduced-energy diet in women with gestational diabetes: the dietary intervention in gestational diabetes DiGest randomized clinical trial","authors":"Laura C. Kusinski, Danielle Jones, Nooria Atta, Elizabeth Turner, Suzanne Smith, Linda M. Oude Griep, Kirsten Rennie, Emanuella De Lucia Rolfe, Stephen J. Sharp, Vern Farewell, Helen R. Murphy, Roy Taylor, Claire L. Meek","doi":"10.1038/s41591-024-03356-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reduced-energy diets promote weight loss and improve long-term outcomes in type 2 diabetes but are untested in gestational diabetes. We aimed to identify if weight loss in pregnancy improves perinatal outcomes in gestational diabetes. We performed a multicentre parallel, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of energy restriction in women with singleton pregnancies, gestational diabetes and body mass index ≥25 kg m−2. Participants were randomized to receive a standard-energy control diet (2,000 kcal d−1) or reduced-energy intervention diet (1,200 kcal d−1) from enrollment (29 weeks) until delivery, provided as weekly diet boxes (40% carbohydrate, 35% fat, 25% protein). The randomization was performed in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by center and blinded to the participants and study team. Primary outcomes were maternal weight change from enrollment to 36 weeks and offspring birth weight. In total, 425 participants were randomized to the control (n = 211) or intervention (n = 214). Outcome data were available for 388 of 425 (90.1%) participants at 36 weeks and 382 of 425 (89.8%) at delivery. There was no evidence of a difference in maternal weight change to 36 weeks between groups (intervention effect −0.20 (95% confidence interval −1.01, 0.61); P > 0.1) and offspring standardized birth weight (intervention effect 0.005 (−0.19, 0.20); P > 0.1). A reduced-energy diet was safe in pregnancy. ISRCTN registration no. 65152174 . In a clinical trial in pregnant women with gestational diabetes, a dietary intervention for energy restriction was safe and did not result in any difference in maternal weight or offspring standardized birth weight outcomes compared to the control arm.","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"31 2","pages":"514-523"},"PeriodicalIF":58.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03356-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03356-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reduced-energy diets promote weight loss and improve long-term outcomes in type 2 diabetes but are untested in gestational diabetes. We aimed to identify if weight loss in pregnancy improves perinatal outcomes in gestational diabetes. We performed a multicentre parallel, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of energy restriction in women with singleton pregnancies, gestational diabetes and body mass index ≥25 kg m−2. Participants were randomized to receive a standard-energy control diet (2,000 kcal d−1) or reduced-energy intervention diet (1,200 kcal d−1) from enrollment (29 weeks) until delivery, provided as weekly diet boxes (40% carbohydrate, 35% fat, 25% protein). The randomization was performed in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by center and blinded to the participants and study team. Primary outcomes were maternal weight change from enrollment to 36 weeks and offspring birth weight. In total, 425 participants were randomized to the control (n = 211) or intervention (n = 214). Outcome data were available for 388 of 425 (90.1%) participants at 36 weeks and 382 of 425 (89.8%) at delivery. There was no evidence of a difference in maternal weight change to 36 weeks between groups (intervention effect −0.20 (95% confidence interval −1.01, 0.61); P > 0.1) and offspring standardized birth weight (intervention effect 0.005 (−0.19, 0.20); P > 0.1). A reduced-energy diet was safe in pregnancy. ISRCTN registration no. 65152174 . In a clinical trial in pregnant women with gestational diabetes, a dietary intervention for energy restriction was safe and did not result in any difference in maternal weight or offspring standardized birth weight outcomes compared to the control arm.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
期刊最新文献
Multiomic profiling of T cell lymphoma after therapy with anti-BCMA CAR T cells and GPRC5D-directed bispecific antibody Telemedicine-based integrated management of atrial fibrillation in village clinics: a cluster randomized trial Reduced-energy diet in women with gestational diabetes: the dietary intervention in gestational diabetes DiGest randomized clinical trial Epigenetic footprints in prenatal cell-free DNA reveal risk of preeclampsia Integrating the environmental and genetic architectures of aging and mortality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1