Using student-staff partnership to teach early years medical students about quality improvement: an evaluation.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BMC Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1186/s12909-025-06779-7
Cate Goldwater Breheny, Eve O'Connell, Lisa-Jayne Edwards, Noreen Ryan
{"title":"Using student-staff partnership to teach early years medical students about quality improvement: an evaluation.","authors":"Cate Goldwater Breheny, Eve O'Connell, Lisa-Jayne Edwards, Noreen Ryan","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06779-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality Improvement (QI) skills are recognized as a key outcome for medical students but are still rarely taught at the undergraduate level. Whilst there is evidence that preclinical students enjoy learning about QI, there is limited practical work exploring the best way to teach QI to this cohort. There are gaps in the literature around the evaluation of student-staff partnership approaches in the context of teaching QI, especially in line with the sustainable QI (susQI) framework. Our study evaluates a worksheet-based interactive session developed through student-staff partnership. The session was delivered to year one medical students in January 2024 at Imperial College School of Medicine (ICSM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An inductive approach to thematic analysis was used to review worksheet content submitted by students during the teaching session. This method was employed to determine the session's effectiveness and ascertain common themes of interest and application. 16 groups comprising 69 total students submitted worksheets for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three themes were identified: Making QI personal: learners chose to focus on improving their university experience over clinical projects, which affected how they identified stakeholders and designed their QI interventions; Misinterpretation of technical language: learners used their everyday understanding of QI terminology in the worksheets, evidencing some misconceptions; Understanding QI as a process: learners reported understanding and engaging with QI as a process and set of skills. Overall, students demonstrated both their understanding and application of QI methodology through engagement with the worksheet-based tasks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Student-staff partnership is a feasible tool to develop and deliver an engaging and effective teaching session on QI, in line with susQI principles, for students with limited clinical experience. Further evaluation and use of partnership approaches in developing QI teaching and curricula are welcome and will likely deliver positive outcomes for learners.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"263"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11837700/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06779-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Quality Improvement (QI) skills are recognized as a key outcome for medical students but are still rarely taught at the undergraduate level. Whilst there is evidence that preclinical students enjoy learning about QI, there is limited practical work exploring the best way to teach QI to this cohort. There are gaps in the literature around the evaluation of student-staff partnership approaches in the context of teaching QI, especially in line with the sustainable QI (susQI) framework. Our study evaluates a worksheet-based interactive session developed through student-staff partnership. The session was delivered to year one medical students in January 2024 at Imperial College School of Medicine (ICSM).

Methods: An inductive approach to thematic analysis was used to review worksheet content submitted by students during the teaching session. This method was employed to determine the session's effectiveness and ascertain common themes of interest and application. 16 groups comprising 69 total students submitted worksheets for analysis.

Results: Three themes were identified: Making QI personal: learners chose to focus on improving their university experience over clinical projects, which affected how they identified stakeholders and designed their QI interventions; Misinterpretation of technical language: learners used their everyday understanding of QI terminology in the worksheets, evidencing some misconceptions; Understanding QI as a process: learners reported understanding and engaging with QI as a process and set of skills. Overall, students demonstrated both their understanding and application of QI methodology through engagement with the worksheet-based tasks.

Conclusions: Student-staff partnership is a feasible tool to develop and deliver an engaging and effective teaching session on QI, in line with susQI principles, for students with limited clinical experience. Further evaluation and use of partnership approaches in developing QI teaching and curricula are welcome and will likely deliver positive outcomes for learners.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用师生伙伴关系对早期医学生进行质量改进教育的评价。
背景:质量改进(QI)技能被认为是医学生的关键成果,但在本科阶段仍然很少教授。虽然有证据表明临床前学生喜欢学习气,但探索向这一群体教授气的最佳方法的实际工作有限。在教学QI的背景下,特别是在符合可持续QI (susQI)框架的情况下,关于评估师生合作方法的文献存在空白。我们的研究评估了通过师生合作开发的基于工作表的互动会话。该课程于2024年1月在帝国理工学院医学院(ICSM)向一年级医科学生提供。方法:采用主题分析的归纳方法,对学生在教学期间提交的工作表内容进行审查。采用这种方法来确定会议的有效性,并确定感兴趣和适用的共同主题。16组共69名学生提交工作表供分析。结果:确定了三个主题:使QI个性化:学习者选择专注于改善他们的大学经历而不是临床项目,这影响了他们如何识别利益相关者并设计他们的QI干预措施;对技术语言的误解:学习者在工作表中使用他们对QI术语的日常理解,证明了一些误解;将QI理解为一个过程:学习者报告将QI理解和参与作为一个过程和一组技能。总的来说,学生们通过参与基于工作表的任务,展示了他们对QI方法的理解和应用。结论:师生合作是一种可行的工具,可以根据susQI原则,为临床经验有限的学生开发和提供一种参与和有效的QI教学课程。我们欢迎进一步评估和使用伙伴关系方法来发展QI教学和课程,这可能会为学习者带来积极的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
期刊最新文献
Academic foundation and postgraduate exam success: the serial mediating roles of psychological state and behavioral engagement. Integration of exercise and sports medicine curriculum in China: a structured pilot course evaluation conducted among medical students. AI as a differentiated cognitive partner in medical education: a comparative study of popular science versus research-based curriculum extensions in histology and embryology. A modified murtagh-style safe diagnostic rubric for general practice training: preliminary validity evidence from a real-world implementation study. Structured phantom-assisted simulation for early abdominal ultrasound skill training in ultrasound medicine residents: a quasi-experimental study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1