Qiumin Liu , Vincent A.C. van den Berg , Erik T. Verhoef , Rui Jiang
{"title":"Pricing in the stochastic bottleneck model with price-sensitive demand","authors":"Qiumin Liu , Vincent A.C. van den Berg , Erik T. Verhoef , Rui Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.trb.2025.103176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We analyse time-varying tolling in the stochastic bottleneck model with price-sensitive demand and uncertain capacity. We find that price sensitivity and its interplay with uncertainty have important implications for the effects of tolling on travel costs, welfare and consumers. We evaluate three fully time-variant tolls and a step toll proposed in previous studies. We also consider a uniform toll, which affects overall demand but not trip timing decisions. The first fully time-variant toll is the ‘first-best’ toll, which varies non-linearly over time and results in a departure rate that also varies over time. It raises the generalised price (i.e. the sum of travel cost and toll), thus lowering demand. These outcomes differ fundamentally from those found for first-best pricing in the deterministic bottleneck model. We call the second toll ‘second-best’: it is simpler to design and implement as it maximises welfare under the constraint that the departure rate is constant over time. While a constant rate is optimal without uncertainty, it is not under uncertain capacity. Next, ‘third-best’ tolling adds the further constraint to the second-best that the generalised price should stay the same as without tolling. It attains a lower welfare and higher expected travel cost than the second-best scheme, but a lower generalised price. All our other tolls raise the price compared to the no-toll case.</div><div>In our numerical study, when there is less uncertainty: the second-best and third-best tolls achieve welfares closer to that of the first-best toll, and the three schemes become identical without uncertainty. As the degree of uncertainty falls, the uniform and single-step tolls attain higher welfare gains. Also, when demand becomes more price-sensitive, the uniform and single-step tolls attain relatively higher welfare gains. Our step toll would lower the generalised price without uncertainty but raises it in our stochastic setting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 103176"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part B-Methodological","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261525000256","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We analyse time-varying tolling in the stochastic bottleneck model with price-sensitive demand and uncertain capacity. We find that price sensitivity and its interplay with uncertainty have important implications for the effects of tolling on travel costs, welfare and consumers. We evaluate three fully time-variant tolls and a step toll proposed in previous studies. We also consider a uniform toll, which affects overall demand but not trip timing decisions. The first fully time-variant toll is the ‘first-best’ toll, which varies non-linearly over time and results in a departure rate that also varies over time. It raises the generalised price (i.e. the sum of travel cost and toll), thus lowering demand. These outcomes differ fundamentally from those found for first-best pricing in the deterministic bottleneck model. We call the second toll ‘second-best’: it is simpler to design and implement as it maximises welfare under the constraint that the departure rate is constant over time. While a constant rate is optimal without uncertainty, it is not under uncertain capacity. Next, ‘third-best’ tolling adds the further constraint to the second-best that the generalised price should stay the same as without tolling. It attains a lower welfare and higher expected travel cost than the second-best scheme, but a lower generalised price. All our other tolls raise the price compared to the no-toll case.
In our numerical study, when there is less uncertainty: the second-best and third-best tolls achieve welfares closer to that of the first-best toll, and the three schemes become identical without uncertainty. As the degree of uncertainty falls, the uniform and single-step tolls attain higher welfare gains. Also, when demand becomes more price-sensitive, the uniform and single-step tolls attain relatively higher welfare gains. Our step toll would lower the generalised price without uncertainty but raises it in our stochastic setting.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part B publishes papers on all methodological aspects of the subject, particularly those that require mathematical analysis. The general theme of the journal is the development and solution of problems that are adequately motivated to deal with important aspects of the design and/or analysis of transportation systems. Areas covered include: traffic flow; design and analysis of transportation networks; control and scheduling; optimization; queuing theory; logistics; supply chains; development and application of statistical, econometric and mathematical models to address transportation problems; cost models; pricing and/or investment; traveler or shipper behavior; cost-benefit methodologies.