Categorising drivers of curriculum renewal in entry-to-practice health professional education: A scoping review.

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Education Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1111/medu.15614
David L Kok, Mary Xu, Stephen Trumble, Kristie Matthews, Caroline Wright
{"title":"Categorising drivers of curriculum renewal in entry-to-practice health professional education: A scoping review.","authors":"David L Kok, Mary Xu, Stephen Trumble, Kristie Matthews, Caroline Wright","doi":"10.1111/medu.15614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Renewing a health professional education (HPE) curriculum is a significant undertaking, requiring substantial effort and resourcing. However, the factor(s) that should initiate a curriculum renewal remain contentious, and the methods to best assess them are unclear. To begin answering these questions, a comprehensive view of the scope of potential renewal drivers is needed, thus enabling structured inquiry into these (and their interactions) while ensuring no driver categories are being inadvertently overlooked. It would similarly serve as an important checklist for individual institutions undergoing renewal. However, no such list has ever been formulated in a data-driven way. Thus, this scoping review aimed to document the full range of real-world drivers of HPE curricular renewal and create an overarching categorisation of these.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted of the Embase, Medline/PubMed, Global health and CINAHL databases for studies published between 2013 and 2023 describing a completed single-institution curriculum renewal of an entry-to-practice HPE degree. Following independent screening, articles were reviewed and 'extent of renewal', 'renewal characteristics' and the 'initiating driver(s)' of renewal were extracted. Descriptive statistics were generated, and qualitative content analysis performed to generate a categorisation of renewal-initiating drivers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 1408 potential manuscripts, and 239 publications describing 247 renewals were analysed. Forty percent were whole-of-degree renewals. Institutions from all continents were represented. Seventy-seven initiating drivers were identified and grouped into 10 categories: 'Regulatory reasons', 'Pedagogical improvements', 'Community/patient needs', 'Learner experience/satisfaction', 'Exceptional events', 'Learner outcomes', 'Industry benchmarking/reputation', 'Practical/business factors', 'Knowledge/skill issues' and 'Periodic renewals'. 'Regulatory reasons' were the most common reason for whole-of-degree renewals and 'knowledge/skill issues' for part-of-degree renewals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HPE curricula renewals have a wide range of initiating drivers. The proposed categorisation of these should serve as a useful scaffold for institutional curricular review processes and also for directing future scholarly inquiry into curricular renewal.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15614","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Renewing a health professional education (HPE) curriculum is a significant undertaking, requiring substantial effort and resourcing. However, the factor(s) that should initiate a curriculum renewal remain contentious, and the methods to best assess them are unclear. To begin answering these questions, a comprehensive view of the scope of potential renewal drivers is needed, thus enabling structured inquiry into these (and their interactions) while ensuring no driver categories are being inadvertently overlooked. It would similarly serve as an important checklist for individual institutions undergoing renewal. However, no such list has ever been formulated in a data-driven way. Thus, this scoping review aimed to document the full range of real-world drivers of HPE curricular renewal and create an overarching categorisation of these.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted of the Embase, Medline/PubMed, Global health and CINAHL databases for studies published between 2013 and 2023 describing a completed single-institution curriculum renewal of an entry-to-practice HPE degree. Following independent screening, articles were reviewed and 'extent of renewal', 'renewal characteristics' and the 'initiating driver(s)' of renewal were extracted. Descriptive statistics were generated, and qualitative content analysis performed to generate a categorisation of renewal-initiating drivers.

Results: The search identified 1408 potential manuscripts, and 239 publications describing 247 renewals were analysed. Forty percent were whole-of-degree renewals. Institutions from all continents were represented. Seventy-seven initiating drivers were identified and grouped into 10 categories: 'Regulatory reasons', 'Pedagogical improvements', 'Community/patient needs', 'Learner experience/satisfaction', 'Exceptional events', 'Learner outcomes', 'Industry benchmarking/reputation', 'Practical/business factors', 'Knowledge/skill issues' and 'Periodic renewals'. 'Regulatory reasons' were the most common reason for whole-of-degree renewals and 'knowledge/skill issues' for part-of-degree renewals.

Conclusions: HPE curricula renewals have a wide range of initiating drivers. The proposed categorisation of these should serve as a useful scaffold for institutional curricular review processes and also for directing future scholarly inquiry into curricular renewal.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
期刊最新文献
Empowering students to bridge basic and clinical sciences by creating innovative optometric tools. Open-book examination can reduce, exam-related stress in medical students. Partners in Care: A multidisciplinary social care workshop for residents. Categorising drivers of curriculum renewal in entry-to-practice health professional education: A scoping review. Collective impact: A learner-led initiative to bridge silos and advance equity through a Canadian medical school application fee waiver program.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1