Intra-operative consultation: The benefits and optimization of asking for second surgical opinions.

Philip M Kemp Bohan, Beverly Tomita, Caoimhe C Duffy, Simon A Wallace, Jennifer M Leonard, Lewis J Kaplan, Gary A Bass
{"title":"Intra-operative consultation: The benefits and optimization of asking for second surgical opinions.","authors":"Philip M Kemp Bohan, Beverly Tomita, Caoimhe C Duffy, Simon A Wallace, Jennifer M Leonard, Lewis J Kaplan, Gary A Bass","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2025.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intra-operative consultation (IOC) presents an opportunity for successful collaboration around direct patient care in an unanticipated fashion. Besides technical performance and cognitive guidance, successful IOC benefits from incorporating a blend of non-technical skills (NTS) such as communication, teamwork, and decision-making during the ideally supportive episode. Failure to use such skills may lead to untoward consequences for the surgeon who requests IOC despite successful patient rescue.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This narrative review explores the role of NTS within the context of IOC, particularly focusing on the dynamics between the surgeon seeking assistance and the surgeon providing aid.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed and OVID Medline, covering publications up to January 2024. Search terms included \"non-technical skills,\" \"intra-operative consultation,\" \"conflict management in surgery,\" and \"surgical teamwork.\" Manuscript selection was based on relevance to NTS within the context of IOC. The findings were synthesized to craft a narrative review of the importance of NTS during IOCs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IOC setting variability reflects consulting surgeon experience, case complexity, intra-operative events, resource availability, and responding surgeon specialty. Essential expectations for both the consulting and responding surgeon include embracing a collegial, non-judgmental approach that prioritizes patient safety and team cohesion. Strategies for conflict management-effective communication, active listening, and appropriate non-verbal cues-are readily leveraged to establish a supportive environment during IOC. Additionally, cultural elements - such as the reluctance to seek help due to fear of potential reputational damage - stand as barriers to viewing requesting IOC as a hallmark of maturity and professional practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NTS supports effective and successful IOC, positioning it as a valuable tool for ongoing professional development. By fostering a culture of consultation and collaboration, the surgical community can enhance both patient care and surgeon well-being. Incorporating NTS into surgical training is one means by which to adaptively overcome existing cultural barriers which impede IOC and may asymmetrically impact early career surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2025.02.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intra-operative consultation (IOC) presents an opportunity for successful collaboration around direct patient care in an unanticipated fashion. Besides technical performance and cognitive guidance, successful IOC benefits from incorporating a blend of non-technical skills (NTS) such as communication, teamwork, and decision-making during the ideally supportive episode. Failure to use such skills may lead to untoward consequences for the surgeon who requests IOC despite successful patient rescue.

Objective: This narrative review explores the role of NTS within the context of IOC, particularly focusing on the dynamics between the surgeon seeking assistance and the surgeon providing aid.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed and OVID Medline, covering publications up to January 2024. Search terms included "non-technical skills," "intra-operative consultation," "conflict management in surgery," and "surgical teamwork." Manuscript selection was based on relevance to NTS within the context of IOC. The findings were synthesized to craft a narrative review of the importance of NTS during IOCs.

Results: IOC setting variability reflects consulting surgeon experience, case complexity, intra-operative events, resource availability, and responding surgeon specialty. Essential expectations for both the consulting and responding surgeon include embracing a collegial, non-judgmental approach that prioritizes patient safety and team cohesion. Strategies for conflict management-effective communication, active listening, and appropriate non-verbal cues-are readily leveraged to establish a supportive environment during IOC. Additionally, cultural elements - such as the reluctance to seek help due to fear of potential reputational damage - stand as barriers to viewing requesting IOC as a hallmark of maturity and professional practice.

Conclusions: NTS supports effective and successful IOC, positioning it as a valuable tool for ongoing professional development. By fostering a culture of consultation and collaboration, the surgical community can enhance both patient care and surgeon well-being. Incorporating NTS into surgical training is one means by which to adaptively overcome existing cultural barriers which impede IOC and may asymmetrically impact early career surgeons.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field. Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.
期刊最新文献
Intra-operative consultation: The benefits and optimization of asking for second surgical opinions. Surgeon personality diversity across generations and subspecialties. Surgical interventions in acute complicated mastoiditis - is a cortical mastoidectomy always required? A 5-year retrospective cohort study. Optimal approaches to flap reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection: A systematic review. Closed incision negative pressure wound therapy in oncoplastic breast surgery: A single-centre analysis and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1