Mast hindcasts reveal pervasive effects of extreme drought on a foundational conifer species

IF 8.1 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES New Phytologist Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1111/nph.20321
Andreas P. Wion, Ian S. Pearse, Max Broxson, Miranda D. Redmond
{"title":"Mast hindcasts reveal pervasive effects of extreme drought on a foundational conifer species","authors":"Andreas P. Wion,&nbsp;Ian S. Pearse,&nbsp;Max Broxson,&nbsp;Miranda D. Redmond","doi":"10.1111/nph.20321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>\n \n </p><ul>\n \n \n <li>Predicting seed production is challenging because many plants produce highly variable crops among years (i.e. masting), but doing so can inform forest management, conservation, and our understanding of ecosystem trajectories in a changing climate. We evaluated the ability of an existing model to forecast masting in an ecologically and culturally important tree species in the southwestern United States, <i>Pinus edulis</i>.</li>\n \n \n <li>Annual seed cone production was predicted using cross-validation techniques on two unique out-of-sample datasets, representing different collection methods and spatial scales (cone scars and cone counts). We then hindcasted this model into the historical past to evaluate whether seed production has declined with the onset of extreme drought conditions in western North America.</li>\n \n \n <li>The evaluated model had fair skill, with root-mean-squared error of 6%. The model had better skill predicting the interannual variability within a site than among sites (i.e. within years). Hindcast analyses indicated recent (2000–2024) mean annual cone production was 30.6% lower than in the past century (1900–1999).</li>\n \n \n <li>Mast forecasts are within reach, but much room remains for improvement. Forecasts may be a powerful tool to anticipate the effects of climate change on forests and woodlands.</li>\n </ul>\n \n </div>","PeriodicalId":214,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":"246 2","pages":"450-460"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nph.20321","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  • Predicting seed production is challenging because many plants produce highly variable crops among years (i.e. masting), but doing so can inform forest management, conservation, and our understanding of ecosystem trajectories in a changing climate. We evaluated the ability of an existing model to forecast masting in an ecologically and culturally important tree species in the southwestern United States, Pinus edulis.
  • Annual seed cone production was predicted using cross-validation techniques on two unique out-of-sample datasets, representing different collection methods and spatial scales (cone scars and cone counts). We then hindcasted this model into the historical past to evaluate whether seed production has declined with the onset of extreme drought conditions in western North America.
  • The evaluated model had fair skill, with root-mean-squared error of 6%. The model had better skill predicting the interannual variability within a site than among sites (i.e. within years). Hindcast analyses indicated recent (2000–2024) mean annual cone production was 30.6% lower than in the past century (1900–1999).
  • Mast forecasts are within reach, but much room remains for improvement. Forecasts may be a powerful tool to anticipate the effects of climate change on forests and woodlands.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
桅杆预测揭示了极端干旱对基础针叶树物种的普遍影响
预测种子产量是具有挑战性的,因为许多植物在不同的年份里会产生高度变化的作物(即播种),但这样做可以为森林管理、保护和我们对气候变化中的生态系统轨迹的理解提供信息。我们评估了现有模型预测美国西南部一种生态和文化上重要的树种——松松(Pinus edulis)的生物量的能力。利用交叉验证技术对两个独特的样本外数据集进行预测,这些数据集代表不同的收集方法和空间尺度(锥痕和锥数)。然后,我们将这个模型后推到历史上,以评估种子产量是否随着北美西部极端干旱条件的出现而下降。评估模型具有良好的技能,均方根误差为6%。该模型对一个站点内年际变化的预测能力优于站点间年际变化的预测能力。后验分析表明,最近(2000-2024年)的年均锥体产量比上个世纪(1900-1999年)低30.6%。大多数预测是可以实现的,但仍有很大的改进空间。预报可能是预测气候变化对森林和林地影响的有力工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Phytologist
New Phytologist 生物-植物科学
自引率
5.30%
发文量
728
期刊介绍: New Phytologist is an international electronic journal published 24 times a year. It is owned by the New Phytologist Foundation, a non-profit-making charitable organization dedicated to promoting plant science. The journal publishes excellent, novel, rigorous, and timely research and scholarship in plant science and its applications. The articles cover topics in five sections: Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology. These sections encompass intracellular processes, global environmental change, and encourage cross-disciplinary approaches. The journal recognizes the use of techniques from molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches in plant science. Abstracting and Indexing Information for New Phytologist includes Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Agroforestry Abstracts, Biochemistry & Biophysics Citation Index, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Environment Index, Global Health, and Plant Breeding Abstracts, and others.
期刊最新文献
Limitations of temporally linearized soil-water flux gradients in estimating root water uptake. Metabolic capacities and potential microbial interactions in red and green snow of the Antarctic Peninsula. Enoyl‐ CoA hydratase genes underlie natural variation of lactones in cultivated and wild strawberries Scaling plant hydraulic traits to predict ecosystem fluxes under drought Nitrate-constructed fungal communities and rhizosphere metabolites confer resistance to Fusarium wilt in cucumber.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1