Plant nitrogen uptake preference and drivers in natural ecosystems at the global scale

IF 8.3 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES New Phytologist Pub Date : 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1111/nph.70030
Jinhua Mao, Jinsong Wang, Jiaqiang Liao, Xingliang Xu, Dashuan Tian, Ruiyang Zhang, Jinlong Peng, Shuli Niu
{"title":"Plant nitrogen uptake preference and drivers in natural ecosystems at the global scale","authors":"Jinhua Mao, Jinsong Wang, Jiaqiang Liao, Xingliang Xu, Dashuan Tian, Ruiyang Zhang, Jinlong Peng, Shuli Niu","doi":"10.1111/nph.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>\n</p><ul>\n<li>Elucidating plant nitrogen (N) acquisition is crucial for understanding plant N strategies and ecosystem productivity. However, the variation in plant N uptake preference and its controlling factors on a global scale remain unclear.</li>\n<li>We conducted a global synthesis to explore plant N preference patterns and driving factors.</li>\n<li>Globally, the average contributions of ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>), nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>), and glycine N to the total plant N uptake were 41.6 ± 1.1%, 32.8 ± 1.2%, and 25.6 ± 0.9%, respectively. However, plant N uptake preferences differed significantly among climatic regions and vegetation types. Soil NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> was the most preferred N form by plants in (sub)tropical regions, whereas NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> preference was significantly higher in high-latitude than low-latitude regions. Plant functional type was one of the most important factors driving NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> preference, with significantly higher NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> preference of nonwoody species than broadleaf-evergreen, conifer, and shrub species. Organic N preference was lowest in (sub)tropics and significantly lower than that in temperate and alpine regions.</li>\n<li>This study shows clear climatic patterns and different influencing factors of plant NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> preference, which can contribute to the accurate prediction of N constraints on ecosystem productivity and soil carbon dynamics.</li>\n</ul><p></p>","PeriodicalId":214,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  • Elucidating plant nitrogen (N) acquisition is crucial for understanding plant N strategies and ecosystem productivity. However, the variation in plant N uptake preference and its controlling factors on a global scale remain unclear.
  • We conducted a global synthesis to explore plant N preference patterns and driving factors.
  • Globally, the average contributions of ammonium (NH4+), nitrate (NO3), and glycine N to the total plant N uptake were 41.6 ± 1.1%, 32.8 ± 1.2%, and 25.6 ± 0.9%, respectively. However, plant N uptake preferences differed significantly among climatic regions and vegetation types. Soil NH4+ was the most preferred N form by plants in (sub)tropical regions, whereas NO3 preference was significantly higher in high-latitude than low-latitude regions. Plant functional type was one of the most important factors driving NO3 preference, with significantly higher NO3 preference of nonwoody species than broadleaf-evergreen, conifer, and shrub species. Organic N preference was lowest in (sub)tropics and significantly lower than that in temperate and alpine regions.
  • This study shows clear climatic patterns and different influencing factors of plant NH4+ and NO3 preference, which can contribute to the accurate prediction of N constraints on ecosystem productivity and soil carbon dynamics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Phytologist
New Phytologist 生物-植物科学
自引率
5.30%
发文量
728
期刊介绍: New Phytologist is an international electronic journal published 24 times a year. It is owned by the New Phytologist Foundation, a non-profit-making charitable organization dedicated to promoting plant science. The journal publishes excellent, novel, rigorous, and timely research and scholarship in plant science and its applications. The articles cover topics in five sections: Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology. These sections encompass intracellular processes, global environmental change, and encourage cross-disciplinary approaches. The journal recognizes the use of techniques from molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches in plant science. Abstracting and Indexing Information for New Phytologist includes Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Agroforestry Abstracts, Biochemistry & Biophysics Citation Index, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Environment Index, Global Health, and Plant Breeding Abstracts, and others.
期刊最新文献
Plant nitrogen uptake preference and drivers in natural ecosystems at the global scale Ergosterol-induced immune response in barley involves phosphorylation of phosphatidylinositol phosphate metabolic enzymes and activation of diterpene biosynthesis Unraveling the extensive phylogenetic discordance and evolutionary history of spurless taxa within the Aquilegia ecalcarata complex The role of indole-3-acetic acid and characterization of PIN transporters in complex streptophyte alga Chara braunii Shifts in vernalization and phenology at the rear edge hold insight into the adaptation of temperate plants to future milder winters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1