{"title":"Plant nitrogen uptake preference and drivers in natural ecosystems at the global scale","authors":"Jinhua Mao, Jinsong Wang, Jiaqiang Liao, Xingliang Xu, Dashuan Tian, Ruiyang Zhang, Jinlong Peng, Shuli Niu","doi":"10.1111/nph.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>\n</p><ul>\n<li>Elucidating plant nitrogen (N) acquisition is crucial for understanding plant N strategies and ecosystem productivity. However, the variation in plant N uptake preference and its controlling factors on a global scale remain unclear.</li>\n<li>We conducted a global synthesis to explore plant N preference patterns and driving factors.</li>\n<li>Globally, the average contributions of ammonium (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>), nitrate (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>), and glycine N to the total plant N uptake were 41.6 ± 1.1%, 32.8 ± 1.2%, and 25.6 ± 0.9%, respectively. However, plant N uptake preferences differed significantly among climatic regions and vegetation types. Soil NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> was the most preferred N form by plants in (sub)tropical regions, whereas NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> preference was significantly higher in high-latitude than low-latitude regions. Plant functional type was one of the most important factors driving NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> preference, with significantly higher NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> preference of nonwoody species than broadleaf-evergreen, conifer, and shrub species. Organic N preference was lowest in (sub)tropics and significantly lower than that in temperate and alpine regions.</li>\n<li>This study shows clear climatic patterns and different influencing factors of plant NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup> and NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup> preference, which can contribute to the accurate prediction of N constraints on ecosystem productivity and soil carbon dynamics.</li>\n</ul><p></p>","PeriodicalId":214,"journal":{"name":"New Phytologist","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Phytologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.70030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Elucidating plant nitrogen (N) acquisition is crucial for understanding plant N strategies and ecosystem productivity. However, the variation in plant N uptake preference and its controlling factors on a global scale remain unclear.
We conducted a global synthesis to explore plant N preference patterns and driving factors.
Globally, the average contributions of ammonium (NH4+), nitrate (NO3−), and glycine N to the total plant N uptake were 41.6 ± 1.1%, 32.8 ± 1.2%, and 25.6 ± 0.9%, respectively. However, plant N uptake preferences differed significantly among climatic regions and vegetation types. Soil NH4+ was the most preferred N form by plants in (sub)tropical regions, whereas NO3− preference was significantly higher in high-latitude than low-latitude regions. Plant functional type was one of the most important factors driving NO3− preference, with significantly higher NO3− preference of nonwoody species than broadleaf-evergreen, conifer, and shrub species. Organic N preference was lowest in (sub)tropics and significantly lower than that in temperate and alpine regions.
This study shows clear climatic patterns and different influencing factors of plant NH4+ and NO3− preference, which can contribute to the accurate prediction of N constraints on ecosystem productivity and soil carbon dynamics.
期刊介绍:
New Phytologist is an international electronic journal published 24 times a year. It is owned by the New Phytologist Foundation, a non-profit-making charitable organization dedicated to promoting plant science. The journal publishes excellent, novel, rigorous, and timely research and scholarship in plant science and its applications. The articles cover topics in five sections: Physiology & Development, Environment, Interaction, Evolution, and Transformative Plant Biotechnology. These sections encompass intracellular processes, global environmental change, and encourage cross-disciplinary approaches. The journal recognizes the use of techniques from molecular and cell biology, functional genomics, modeling, and system-based approaches in plant science. Abstracting and Indexing Information for New Phytologist includes Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, Agroforestry Abstracts, Biochemistry & Biophysics Citation Index, Botanical Pesticides, CAB Abstracts®, Environment Index, Global Health, and Plant Breeding Abstracts, and others.