{"title":"Renewable R&D investments and carbon emissions in G7 countries: The mediating roles of technology and economic efficiency","authors":"Rajitha Rajendran , Jayaraman Krishnaswamy , Nava Subramaniam , P.K. Viswanathan","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The planet is at a critical juncture in addressing the ongoing climatic crisis, with increasing calls to reduce atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations to stabilise global climate change. A fundamental shift from fossil fuels to clean and renewable energy (RE) systems involves technological development. However, the mechanics of renewable energy funding are poorly understood, slowing the financing rate for renewable energy technology (RETs). This study explores the efficiency of RETs (hydropower, wind, solar, and biomass) and their role in determining the public Renewable R&D investments (RRDI) for CO2 reduction in G7 countries. The analysis focuses on the carbon efficiency of disaggregated energy production technologies, including hydropower, wind, solar, and biomass, as mediators between R&D funding and carbon emissions. The study introduces GDP per capita (GDPpc) as the sequential-mediator to examine the economic efficiency of these technologies. The proposed conceptual framework is supported by the multi-level perspective socio-technical transition theory. The G7 countries' annual data from 2000 to 2021 is used to evaluate the hypotheses. Multiple regression using SPSS Process-Macro was performed using bootstrap analysis to estimate robustness. The findings indicate that public R&D funding significantly improves the carbon-efficiency of G7 countries RETs. However, the technological interaction with GDPpc is unfavourable in increasing CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, revealing that RETs are carbon-efficient but not economically efficient. G7 countries require policies to improve the profitability of RETs by incentivising demand-side technologies. The novelty of this study is its examination of the technological and economic effectiveness of the RETs in the G7 using a management conceptual framework, which offers country-specific recommendations for R&D investment portfolios.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 101898"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095717872500013X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The planet is at a critical juncture in addressing the ongoing climatic crisis, with increasing calls to reduce atmospheric CO2 concentrations to stabilise global climate change. A fundamental shift from fossil fuels to clean and renewable energy (RE) systems involves technological development. However, the mechanics of renewable energy funding are poorly understood, slowing the financing rate for renewable energy technology (RETs). This study explores the efficiency of RETs (hydropower, wind, solar, and biomass) and their role in determining the public Renewable R&D investments (RRDI) for CO2 reduction in G7 countries. The analysis focuses on the carbon efficiency of disaggregated energy production technologies, including hydropower, wind, solar, and biomass, as mediators between R&D funding and carbon emissions. The study introduces GDP per capita (GDPpc) as the sequential-mediator to examine the economic efficiency of these technologies. The proposed conceptual framework is supported by the multi-level perspective socio-technical transition theory. The G7 countries' annual data from 2000 to 2021 is used to evaluate the hypotheses. Multiple regression using SPSS Process-Macro was performed using bootstrap analysis to estimate robustness. The findings indicate that public R&D funding significantly improves the carbon-efficiency of G7 countries RETs. However, the technological interaction with GDPpc is unfavourable in increasing CO2 emissions, revealing that RETs are carbon-efficient but not economically efficient. G7 countries require policies to improve the profitability of RETs by incentivising demand-side technologies. The novelty of this study is its examination of the technological and economic effectiveness of the RETs in the G7 using a management conceptual framework, which offers country-specific recommendations for R&D investment portfolios.
期刊介绍:
Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services.
Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.