Comparative evaluation of Peschl and FT4 full-bed rotational shear cells for powder flow characterization

IF 4.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Powder Technology Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.powtec.2025.120810
Sara Koynov , Kristen Duda , Plinio A. De los Santos , David J. Goldfarb
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of Peschl and FT4 full-bed rotational shear cells for powder flow characterization","authors":"Sara Koynov ,&nbsp;Kristen Duda ,&nbsp;Plinio A. De los Santos ,&nbsp;David J. Goldfarb","doi":"10.1016/j.powtec.2025.120810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The method of shear cell testing plays a pivotal role in assessing the flowability of powders, notably in the context of evaluating pharmaceutical formulations and processes. Despite numerous studies on shear cell methodology and its diverse applications, there remains a need to compare the performance of specific shear cell designs. This study addresses this gap by offering a comprehensive comparison of two full-bed rotational shear cells – the Peschl and FT4 cells. The evaluation focuses on assessing the precision and accuracy of each instrument, considering six materials: two reference materials with well-established behavior and four pharmaceutically relevant materials. Key parameters obtained from the measured yield loci were analyzed and compared, shedding light on the differences in performance between the two shear cells. Statistical analysis using regression methods revealed the significance of not only the test material but also the shear cell used for measurement, emphasizing the influential role of shear cell design. Additionally, this work delves into the significance of powder bed density during shear cell measurements and its broader implications for comprehensive powder characterization, providing valuable insights for the field of material science and pharmaceutical formulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":407,"journal":{"name":"Powder Technology","volume":"456 ","pages":"Article 120810"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Powder Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032591025002050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The method of shear cell testing plays a pivotal role in assessing the flowability of powders, notably in the context of evaluating pharmaceutical formulations and processes. Despite numerous studies on shear cell methodology and its diverse applications, there remains a need to compare the performance of specific shear cell designs. This study addresses this gap by offering a comprehensive comparison of two full-bed rotational shear cells – the Peschl and FT4 cells. The evaluation focuses on assessing the precision and accuracy of each instrument, considering six materials: two reference materials with well-established behavior and four pharmaceutically relevant materials. Key parameters obtained from the measured yield loci were analyzed and compared, shedding light on the differences in performance between the two shear cells. Statistical analysis using regression methods revealed the significance of not only the test material but also the shear cell used for measurement, emphasizing the influential role of shear cell design. Additionally, this work delves into the significance of powder bed density during shear cell measurements and its broader implications for comprehensive powder characterization, providing valuable insights for the field of material science and pharmaceutical formulation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于粉末流动表征的Peschl和FT4全床旋转剪切细胞的比较评价
剪切细胞测试方法在评估粉末的流动性方面起着关键作用,特别是在评估药物配方和工艺的背景下。尽管对剪切单元方法及其各种应用进行了大量研究,但仍然需要比较特定剪切单元设计的性能。本研究通过提供两种全层旋转剪切细胞- Peschl和FT4细胞的全面比较来解决这一差距。评估的重点是评估每种仪器的精密度和准确度,考虑六种材料:两种具有确定行为的标准材料和四种药学相关材料。从测量的屈服位点获得的关键参数进行了分析和比较,揭示了两种抗剪单元之间的性能差异。采用回归方法进行统计分析,不仅揭示了试验材料的显著性,而且揭示了用于测量的剪切箱的显著性,强调了剪切箱设计的影响作用。此外,这项工作深入研究了剪切细胞测量过程中粉末床密度的重要性及其对全面粉末表征的更广泛影响,为材料科学和药物配方领域提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Powder Technology
Powder Technology 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
1047
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Powder Technology is an International Journal on the Science and Technology of Wet and Dry Particulate Systems. Powder Technology publishes papers on all aspects of the formation of particles and their characterisation and on the study of systems containing particulate solids. No limitation is imposed on the size of the particles, which may range from nanometre scale, as in pigments or aerosols, to that of mined or quarried materials. The following list of topics is not intended to be comprehensive, but rather to indicate typical subjects which fall within the scope of the journal's interests: Formation and synthesis of particles by precipitation and other methods. Modification of particles by agglomeration, coating, comminution and attrition. Characterisation of the size, shape, surface area, pore structure and strength of particles and agglomerates (including the origins and effects of inter particle forces). Packing, failure, flow and permeability of assemblies of particles. Particle-particle interactions and suspension rheology. Handling and processing operations such as slurry flow, fluidization, pneumatic conveying. Interactions between particles and their environment, including delivery of particulate products to the body. Applications of particle technology in production of pharmaceuticals, chemicals, foods, pigments, structural, and functional materials and in environmental and energy related matters. For materials-oriented contributions we are looking for articles revealing the effect of particle/powder characteristics (size, morphology and composition, in that order) on material performance or functionality and, ideally, comparison to any industrial standard.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents continued Graphical abstract TOC Graphical abstract TOC The mechanism of radial airflow in enhancing dry high-gradient magnetic separation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1