The River study: the first prospective multicenter trial of a novel venous sinus stent for the treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.

IF 4.3 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI:10.1136/jnis-2024-022540
Athos Patsalides, Kyle M Fargen, Jason M Davies, Srikanth R Boddu, Marc Dinkin, Ryan Priest, Howard D Pomeranz, Y Pierre Gobin, Adnan H Siddiqui
{"title":"The River study: the first prospective multicenter trial of a novel venous sinus stent for the treatment of idiopathic intracranial hypertension.","authors":"Athos Patsalides, Kyle M Fargen, Jason M Davies, Srikanth R Boddu, Marc Dinkin, Ryan Priest, Howard D Pomeranz, Y Pierre Gobin, Adnan H Siddiqui","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2024-022540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The River stent is the first stent specifically designed for intracranial venous sinuses. We report the 1-year results of the River trial, performed to obtain Humanitarian Device Exemption approval of the River stent in the United States (US).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The River trial was a prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm trial which enrolled 39 subjects at 5 US centers. Eligible patients had clinical diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) with severe headaches or visual field loss and had failed medical therapy. The primary safety endpoint was the 1-year rate of major adverse events compared with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting using historical controls. The primary benefit endpoint was a composite at 1 year of clinical improvement and absence of venous sinus stenosis. Secondary endpoints included improvement in pulsatile tinnitus, visual symptoms, quality of life (QOL) scores, and medications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All procedures were technically successful. There was one serious adverse event, a gastrointestinal hemorrhage observed 2 months after the procedure while the patient was still on dual antiplatelet therapy. The primary safety endpoint was met with a rate of major adverse event of 5.4% versus 51.7% for CSF shunts. The primary benefit endpoint was achieved in 60% of trial participants. Additional improvements were also observed in opening CSF pressure, headaches, papilledema, pulsatile tinnitus, visual symptoms, and QOL scores. Post hoc analysis demonstrated that subjects with minimal or absent papilledema at baseline showed similar improvement compared with subjects with papilledema at baseline, in terms of headaches, pulsatile tinnitus, and QOL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The River study 1- year results establish safety and suggest efficacy for venous sinus stenting in IIH subjects who have failed medical therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"11-19"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2024-022540","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The River stent is the first stent specifically designed for intracranial venous sinuses. We report the 1-year results of the River trial, performed to obtain Humanitarian Device Exemption approval of the River stent in the United States (US).

Methods: The River trial was a prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm trial which enrolled 39 subjects at 5 US centers. Eligible patients had clinical diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) with severe headaches or visual field loss and had failed medical therapy. The primary safety endpoint was the 1-year rate of major adverse events compared with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting using historical controls. The primary benefit endpoint was a composite at 1 year of clinical improvement and absence of venous sinus stenosis. Secondary endpoints included improvement in pulsatile tinnitus, visual symptoms, quality of life (QOL) scores, and medications.

Results: All procedures were technically successful. There was one serious adverse event, a gastrointestinal hemorrhage observed 2 months after the procedure while the patient was still on dual antiplatelet therapy. The primary safety endpoint was met with a rate of major adverse event of 5.4% versus 51.7% for CSF shunts. The primary benefit endpoint was achieved in 60% of trial participants. Additional improvements were also observed in opening CSF pressure, headaches, papilledema, pulsatile tinnitus, visual symptoms, and QOL scores. Post hoc analysis demonstrated that subjects with minimal or absent papilledema at baseline showed similar improvement compared with subjects with papilledema at baseline, in terms of headaches, pulsatile tinnitus, and QOL.

Conclusions: The River study 1- year results establish safety and suggest efficacy for venous sinus stenting in IIH subjects who have failed medical therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
River研究:一种新型静脉窦支架治疗特发性颅内高压的首个前瞻性多中心试验。
背景:River支架是第一个专门为颅内静脉窦设计的支架。我们报告了River试验1年的结果,该试验是为了获得River支架在美国的人道主义设备豁免批准而进行的。方法:River试验是一项前瞻性、开放标签、多中心、单臂试验,在美国5个中心招募了39名受试者。符合条件的患者临床诊断为特发性颅内高压(IIH),伴有严重头痛或视野丧失,药物治疗失败。主要安全性终点是与历史对照的脑脊液分流术相比,1年内主要不良事件发生率。主要获益终点是1年临床改善和静脉窦狭窄消失的综合结果。次要终点包括搏动性耳鸣、视觉症状、生活质量(QOL)评分和药物的改善。结果:所有手术在技术上均成功。有一个严重的不良事件,在手术后2个月,患者仍在接受双重抗血小板治疗时观察到胃肠道出血。主要安全终点的主要不良事件发生率为5.4%,而脑脊液分流术的不良事件发生率为51.7%。60%的试验参与者达到了主要获益终点。在开放脑脊液压力、头痛、乳头水肿、搏动性耳鸣、视觉症状和生活质量评分方面也观察到额外的改善。事后分析表明,在头痛、脉动性耳鸣和生活质量方面,基线时乳头水肿最小或无乳头水肿的受试者与基线时乳头水肿的受试者相比有相似的改善。结论:River研究1年的结果确定了静脉窦支架置入术对药物治疗失败的IIH患者的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.60%
发文量
291
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.
期刊最新文献
Super large bore catheters in the treatment of stroke: systematic review. Regional brain atrophy, white matter lesions, and functional outcome after endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. Predictors of enucleation after intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma. Mechanisms, predictors, and clinical impact of failed recanalization: a large cohort analysis. Radiation exposure during transvenous embolization of cerebrospinal fluid venous fistulae: determinants, benchmarks, and mitigation strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1