Comparison of the degree of patient satisfaction between transoral thyroidectomy and open thyroidectomy: a survey-based study.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY BMC Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1186/s12893-024-02751-2
Jun Sung Lee, Jooyoung Oh, Jayyoung Bae, Jin Seok Lee, Hyeok Jun Yun, Seok-Mo Kim, Hojin Chang, Yong Sang Lee, Young Song, Hang-Seok Chang
{"title":"Comparison of the degree of patient satisfaction between transoral thyroidectomy and open thyroidectomy: a survey-based study.","authors":"Jun Sung Lee, Jooyoung Oh, Jayyoung Bae, Jin Seok Lee, Hyeok Jun Yun, Seok-Mo Kim, Hojin Chang, Yong Sang Lee, Young Song, Hang-Seok Chang","doi":"10.1186/s12893-024-02751-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent advances in thyroid surgery techniques have increased the number of patients undergoing transoral thyroidectomy, and many patients are concerned about post-thyroidectomy cosmetic effects. This study aimed to compare patient satisfaction after transoral versus conventional thyroidectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted from August 2021 to January 2022 at Gangnam Severance Hospital (Seoul, South Korea). A total of 91 patients underwent transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy (TOET) or open thyroidectomy performed by a single surgeon. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and 15-Item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) postoperative day (POD)#-1 surveys were administered before the surgery. The QoR-15 POD#1 and #2 surveys were administered after the surgery. The Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist surveys were administered on the first day of the outpatient visit after discharge. The survey results were compared to determine the differences between both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only the HADS-Depression survey scores differed significantly between the TOET and open thyroidectomy groups (4.22 ± 0.781 and 5.52 ± 0.84, respectively; P = .039). Multivariable analysis, adjusted for age and weight differences between the conventional and TOET groups, revealed no differences in any of the survey scores, including the HADS-Depression scores. Therefore, no differences were observed in the survey scores between the TOET and open thyroidectomy groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The subjective postoperative stress about pain and the degree of recovery after surgery were similar between the two groups. Thus, there would be no difference in the patient's satisfaction for surgery between the two groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"75"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11841314/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02751-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent advances in thyroid surgery techniques have increased the number of patients undergoing transoral thyroidectomy, and many patients are concerned about post-thyroidectomy cosmetic effects. This study aimed to compare patient satisfaction after transoral versus conventional thyroidectomy.

Methods: This study was conducted from August 2021 to January 2022 at Gangnam Severance Hospital (Seoul, South Korea). A total of 91 patients underwent transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy (TOET) or open thyroidectomy performed by a single surgeon. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and 15-Item Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) postoperative day (POD)#-1 surveys were administered before the surgery. The QoR-15 POD#1 and #2 surveys were administered after the surgery. The Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist surveys were administered on the first day of the outpatient visit after discharge. The survey results were compared to determine the differences between both groups.

Results: Only the HADS-Depression survey scores differed significantly between the TOET and open thyroidectomy groups (4.22 ± 0.781 and 5.52 ± 0.84, respectively; P = .039). Multivariable analysis, adjusted for age and weight differences between the conventional and TOET groups, revealed no differences in any of the survey scores, including the HADS-Depression scores. Therefore, no differences were observed in the survey scores between the TOET and open thyroidectomy groups.

Conclusions: The subjective postoperative stress about pain and the degree of recovery after surgery were similar between the two groups. Thus, there would be no difference in the patient's satisfaction for surgery between the two groups.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经口甲状腺切除术与开放式甲状腺切除术患者满意度的比较:一项基于调查的研究。
背景:近年来甲状腺手术技术的进步增加了接受经口甲状腺切除术的患者数量,许多患者关心甲状腺切除术后的美容效果。本研究旨在比较经口甲状腺切除术与常规甲状腺切除术后患者的满意度。方法:本研究于2021年8月至2022年1月在韩国首尔的Gangnam Severance医院进行。共有91例患者接受了经口内窥镜甲状腺切除术(TOET)或由一名外科医生进行的开放式甲状腺切除术。术前进行医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)、疼痛灾难量表(PCS)和术后15项恢复质量(QoR-15) # 1调查。QoR-15 POD#1和#2调查在手术后进行。创伤后应激障碍检查表调查在出院后门诊就诊的第一天进行。将调查结果进行比较,以确定两组之间的差异。结果:在TOET组和开放式甲状腺切除术组之间,只有HADS-Depression调查得分有显著差异(分别为4.22±0.781和5.52±0.84);p = .039)。多变量分析,调整了传统组和TOET组之间的年龄和体重差异,显示任何调查得分都没有差异,包括HADS-Depression得分。因此,在TOET和开放式甲状腺切除术组之间的调查得分没有观察到差异。结论:两组患者术后主观疼痛压力及术后恢复程度相近。因此,两组患者对手术的满意度没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
期刊最新文献
Application of cephalad approach laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh repair in mid-lower abdominal incisional hernias. Comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) with biological mesh and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM Plus) with composite mesh for umbilical hernia​​. Unilateral Endo-LIF in treating central lumbar spinal stenosis. Treatment of popliteal artery injuries: a comparison of application patterns and short-term outcomes between open surgical and endovascular repair. Surgical management and outcomes of spinal low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma: a single-center case series and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1