Nerve block techniques utilized in post-bariatric surgery: a narrative review.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY BMC Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI:10.1186/s12893-025-02801-3
He Xiao, Yudie Du, Guangyi Li, Yulin Deng, Yixing Ren
{"title":"Nerve block techniques utilized in post-bariatric surgery: a narrative review.","authors":"He Xiao, Yudie Du, Guangyi Li, Yulin Deng, Yixing Ren","doi":"10.1186/s12893-025-02801-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pain relief following bariatric surgery (BS) can be difficult because many patients have obstructive sleep apnea and are more prone to breathing problems caused by excessive opioid use post-surgery. Using nerve blocks is an effective alternative since they enhance patient comfort and decrease the side effects of opioids. In our review, we comprehensively reviewed present methods to alleviate pain after BS including the transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB), the erector spinae plane block (ESPB), the quadratus lumborum block (QLB), the external oblique intercostal block (EOIB), and the rectus sheath block (RB), aiming to summarized the respective and relative advantages of each nerve block for post-BS analgesia. The review concluded that TAPB is the optimized post-BS nerve block for somatic pain and ESPB relieves somatic and visceral pain which can both be combined with RB. Anterior QLB relieves visceral pain and EOIB can be done without the interference of fat. This review also identified key points for future research to improve post-BS nerve blocks.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11841257/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-02801-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pain relief following bariatric surgery (BS) can be difficult because many patients have obstructive sleep apnea and are more prone to breathing problems caused by excessive opioid use post-surgery. Using nerve blocks is an effective alternative since they enhance patient comfort and decrease the side effects of opioids. In our review, we comprehensively reviewed present methods to alleviate pain after BS including the transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB), the erector spinae plane block (ESPB), the quadratus lumborum block (QLB), the external oblique intercostal block (EOIB), and the rectus sheath block (RB), aiming to summarized the respective and relative advantages of each nerve block for post-BS analgesia. The review concluded that TAPB is the optimized post-BS nerve block for somatic pain and ESPB relieves somatic and visceral pain which can both be combined with RB. Anterior QLB relieves visceral pain and EOIB can be done without the interference of fat. This review also identified key points for future research to improve post-BS nerve blocks.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经阻滞技术应用于减肥手术后:叙述性回顾。
减肥手术(BS)后的疼痛缓解可能很困难,因为许多患者患有阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停,并且更容易因术后过量使用阿片类药物而引起呼吸问题。使用神经阻滞是一种有效的替代方法,因为它们提高了患者的舒适度,减少了阿片类药物的副作用。在我们的综述中,我们全面回顾了目前缓解BS后疼痛的方法,包括腹横面阻滞(TAPB)、竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)、腰方肌阻滞(QLB)、外斜肋间阻滞(EOIB)和直肌鞘阻滞(RB),旨在总结每种神经阻滞在BS后镇痛中的各自和相对优势。综上所述,TAPB是治疗躯体疼痛的最佳后bs神经阻滞方法,ESPB可缓解躯体和内脏疼痛,两者均可与RB联合使用。前路QLB减轻内脏疼痛,EOIB可以在没有脂肪干扰的情况下进行。本综述还确定了未来研究改善bs后神经阻滞的关键点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
期刊最新文献
Early postoperative behavioral adherence is associated with recovery efficiency in older adults undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. Disparities in disease presentation and survival after pathological fracture surgery at a middle- and a high-income centre. Comparative outcomes of trauma surgery patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19: a retrospective study. Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids versus tissue-selective therapy stapler for grade II-III hemorrhoids: an exploratory retrospective comparative study. Uniportal subxiphoid thoracoscopic thymectomy using percutaneous suspension technique for giant anterior mediastinal mass resection: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1