Jiajia Zheng, Hong Li, Quan Wen, Yuan Fu, Jiaqi Wu, Hu Chen
{"title":"Artificial intelligent recognition for multiple supernumerary teeth in periapical radiographs based on faster R-CNN and YOLOv8.","authors":"Jiajia Zheng, Hong Li, Quan Wen, Yuan Fu, Jiaqi Wu, Hu Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of automated supernumerary tooth (ST) detection systems on periapical radiographs using Faster R-CNN and YOLOv8 with detection by 8 dental residents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a diagnostic accuracy study of 469 periapical radiographs (419 training vs. 50 test datasets). The primary predictor variables were detectors (dental residents/Faster R-CNN/YOLOv8). The main outcome variables included the diagnostic performance of the model's using precision, recall and intersection over union (IoU). Appropriate statistics were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the test dataset, the precision of Faster R-CNN and YOLOv8 was 0.95 and 0.99, and their average precision was 0.90 and 0.97, respectively. A significant difference was observed between the two models in these metrics, with YOLOv8 outperforming Faster R-CNN in both precision and average precision (P<0.05). Both AI systems outperformed human subjects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on our findings, both YOLOv8 and Faster R-CNN are highly effective in the automated detection of ST in periapical radiographs and could, for example, assist humans in resource-limited situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102293"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102293","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of automated supernumerary tooth (ST) detection systems on periapical radiographs using Faster R-CNN and YOLOv8 with detection by 8 dental residents.
Methods: This was a diagnostic accuracy study of 469 periapical radiographs (419 training vs. 50 test datasets). The primary predictor variables were detectors (dental residents/Faster R-CNN/YOLOv8). The main outcome variables included the diagnostic performance of the model's using precision, recall and intersection over union (IoU). Appropriate statistics were calculated.
Results: In the test dataset, the precision of Faster R-CNN and YOLOv8 was 0.95 and 0.99, and their average precision was 0.90 and 0.97, respectively. A significant difference was observed between the two models in these metrics, with YOLOv8 outperforming Faster R-CNN in both precision and average precision (P<0.05). Both AI systems outperformed human subjects.
Conclusions: Based on our findings, both YOLOv8 and Faster R-CNN are highly effective in the automated detection of ST in periapical radiographs and could, for example, assist humans in resource-limited situations.
期刊介绍:
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics.
Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must:
Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise;
Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research;
Be solely the work of the author(s) stated;
Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal;
Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed.
Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision.
The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.