Artificial intelligent recognition for multiple supernumerary teeth in periapical radiographs based on faster R-CNN and YOLOv8

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102293
Jiajia Zheng , Hong Li , Quan Wen , Yuan Fu , Jiaqi Wu , Hu Chen
{"title":"Artificial intelligent recognition for multiple supernumerary teeth in periapical radiographs based on faster R-CNN and YOLOv8","authors":"Jiajia Zheng ,&nbsp;Hong Li ,&nbsp;Quan Wen ,&nbsp;Yuan Fu ,&nbsp;Jiaqi Wu ,&nbsp;Hu Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of automated supernumerary tooth (ST) detection systems on periapical radiographs using Faster R-CNN and YOLOv8 with detection by 8 dental residents.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a diagnostic accuracy study of 469 periapical radiographs (419 training vs. 50 test datasets). The primary predictor variables were detectors (dental residents/Faster R-CNN/YOLOv8). The main outcome variables included the diagnostic performance of the model's using precision, recall and intersection over union (IoU). Appropriate statistics were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the test dataset, the precision of Faster R-CNN and YOLOv8 was 0.95 and 0.99, and their average precision was 0.90 and 0.97, respectively. A significant difference was observed between the two models in these metrics, with YOLOv8 outperforming Faster R-CNN in both precision and average precision (P&lt;0.05). Both AI systems outperformed human subjects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Based on our findings, both YOLOv8 and Faster R-CNN are highly effective in the automated detection of ST in periapical radiographs and could, for example, assist humans in resource-limited situations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"126 4","pages":"Article 102293"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785525000813","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of automated supernumerary tooth (ST) detection systems on periapical radiographs using Faster R-CNN and YOLOv8 with detection by 8 dental residents.

Methods

This was a diagnostic accuracy study of 469 periapical radiographs (419 training vs. 50 test datasets). The primary predictor variables were detectors (dental residents/Faster R-CNN/YOLOv8). The main outcome variables included the diagnostic performance of the model's using precision, recall and intersection over union (IoU). Appropriate statistics were calculated.

Results

In the test dataset, the precision of Faster R-CNN and YOLOv8 was 0.95 and 0.99, and their average precision was 0.90 and 0.97, respectively. A significant difference was observed between the two models in these metrics, with YOLOv8 outperforming Faster R-CNN in both precision and average precision (P<0.05). Both AI systems outperformed human subjects.

Conclusions

Based on our findings, both YOLOv8 and Faster R-CNN are highly effective in the automated detection of ST in periapical radiographs and could, for example, assist humans in resource-limited situations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于Faster R-CNN和YOLOv8的根尖周x线片多牙人工智能识别
目的:本研究的目的是比较使用Faster R-CNN和YOLOv8的尖周x线片上自动多牙(ST)检测系统与8名牙科居民检测的有效性。方法:这是一项对469张根尖周x线片的诊断准确性研究(419张训练数据集对50张测试数据集)。主要预测变量为检测器(dental resident /Faster R-CNN/YOLOv8)。主要结果变量包括模型的诊断性能,使用精度,召回率和交联(IoU)。计算了适当的统计数据。结果:在测试数据集中,Faster R-CNN和YOLOv8的精度分别为0.95和0.99,平均精度分别为0.90和0.97。在这些指标上,两种模型之间存在显著差异,YOLOv8在精度和平均精度方面都优于Faster R-CNN(结论:根据我们的研究结果,YOLOv8和Faster R-CNN在根尖周x线片中ST的自动检测中都非常有效,例如,在资源有限的情况下可以取代人工。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Surgery, Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
23 days
期刊最新文献
Novel de novo CLCN7 mutation in refractory osteopetrosis-related osteomyelitis: A case report and multidisciplinary therapeutic dilemmas Use of unleavened bread to reduce the appearance of radiolucent areas associated with the palatoglossal air space in panoramic radiographs: A comparative study A 3D-printed craniofacial fracture library with QR-integrated pedagogical content: a technical note for maxillofacial trauma teaching Champions in the making? – The Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in 2026 Sialography and endoscopy-based classification of salivary duct stenosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1