L Kokko , T Puolakkainen , H Thorén , A Piippo-Karjalainen , AL Suominen , J Snäll
{"title":"Traumatic brain injury in patients with facial fracture – A challenge for the clinician?","authors":"L Kokko , T Puolakkainen , H Thorén , A Piippo-Karjalainen , AL Suominen , J Snäll","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence and clinical predictors for missed traumatic brain injury (TBI) diagnosis at primary evaluation in facial fracture patients. The specific aim was to compare the risk between adults and elderly patients.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A retrospective study was performed, and data were collected from medical records. All adult facial fracture patients with associated TBI and a primary Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 or more diagnosed and treated between 2013 and 2018 were included. The elderly group comprised patients aged at least 65 years at the time of injury.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Altogether 253 patients with facial fracture and associated TBI were assessed. In 7.1 % of the cases, the diagnosis of TBI was missed in primary evaluation and thus delayed. When the different age groups were compared, the elderly had a 2.8-fold risk of missed TBI diagnosis (95 % CI 1.1–7.2, <em>p</em>=.0349).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Facial fracture patients are at significant risk of the diagnosis of associated TBI being missed at primary evaluation. Especially elderly patients with other than high-energy trauma mechanism, such as falling on ground level, are at risk of missed TBI diagnosis. Thus, patients with facial fracture should be carefully evaluated to exclude potential TBI. Assessment should occur in trauma centres where multiprofessional evaluation of these patients is routine.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"126 4","pages":"Article 102302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468785525000904","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence and clinical predictors for missed traumatic brain injury (TBI) diagnosis at primary evaluation in facial fracture patients. The specific aim was to compare the risk between adults and elderly patients.
Materials and methods
A retrospective study was performed, and data were collected from medical records. All adult facial fracture patients with associated TBI and a primary Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 or more diagnosed and treated between 2013 and 2018 were included. The elderly group comprised patients aged at least 65 years at the time of injury.
Results
Altogether 253 patients with facial fracture and associated TBI were assessed. In 7.1 % of the cases, the diagnosis of TBI was missed in primary evaluation and thus delayed. When the different age groups were compared, the elderly had a 2.8-fold risk of missed TBI diagnosis (95 % CI 1.1–7.2, p=.0349).
Conclusions
Facial fracture patients are at significant risk of the diagnosis of associated TBI being missed at primary evaluation. Especially elderly patients with other than high-energy trauma mechanism, such as falling on ground level, are at risk of missed TBI diagnosis. Thus, patients with facial fracture should be carefully evaluated to exclude potential TBI. Assessment should occur in trauma centres where multiprofessional evaluation of these patients is routine.
目的:探讨面部骨折患者初诊时外伤性脑损伤(TBI)漏诊的发生率及临床预测因素。具体目的是比较成人和老年患者之间的风险。材料和方法:回顾性研究,资料收集自医疗记录。所有在2013年至2018年间诊断和治疗的伴有TBI且原发性格拉斯哥昏迷评分为13分或以上的成人面部骨折患者均被纳入研究。老年组包括受伤时年龄在65岁以上的患者。结果:共对253例面部骨折伴TBI患者进行了评估。在7.1%的病例中,TBI的诊断在初步评估中被遗漏,从而延误。当不同年龄组进行比较时,老年人有2.8倍的TBI漏诊风险(95% CI 1.1-7.2, p= 0.0349)。结论:面部骨折患者在初步评估中有明显的漏诊相关TBI的风险。特别是非高能创伤机制的老年患者,如地面坠落,有漏诊的风险。因此,面部骨折患者应仔细评估以排除潜在的TBI。评估应在创伤中心进行,对这些患者进行多专业评估是常规的。