A comparative investigation on the energy flow of pure battery electric vehicle under different driving conditions

IF 6.9 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS Applied Thermal Engineering Pub Date : 2025-06-15 Epub Date: 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.126035
Renhua Feng , Zhanye Hua , Jing Yu , Zhichao Zhao , Yong Dan , Huikai Zhai , Xing Shu
{"title":"A comparative investigation on the energy flow of pure battery electric vehicle under different driving conditions","authors":"Renhua Feng ,&nbsp;Zhanye Hua ,&nbsp;Jing Yu ,&nbsp;Zhichao Zhao ,&nbsp;Yong Dan ,&nbsp;Huikai Zhai ,&nbsp;Xing Shu","doi":"10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.126035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The battery electric vehicle (BEV) shows great potential in energy security guarantee and harmful emissions reduction resulting from road traffic increasing. The energy consumption characteristics and operation status of key components under different driving conditions have great impacts on the performance of EVs. However, studies on its variations under different driving conditions over the entire driving distance are limited. In this study, the BEV energy flow characteristics, energy loss, working conditions, and efficiencies of key components under the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC), Worldwide Harmonized Light-duty Test Cycle (WLTC), China Light-duty Vehicle Test Cycle (CLTC), and a constant speed of 120 km/h were comparatively investigated using a chassis dynamometer. The test results revealed that the power consumption rate at 120 km/h was much higher than those under other driving cycle conditions. The increased ratios of the power consumption rate under 120 km/h over NEDC, WLTC, and CLTC were 27.1 %, 16.5 %, and 26.3 %, respectively. However, the energy utilization of the BEV under 120 km/h is much higher than that under other conditions, owing to the relatively high efficiency of the working points and the lack of brake energy consumption. The proportions of motor and motor control unit (MCU) losses under NEDC, WLTC, CLTC, and 120 km/h were 28.8 %, 27.5 %, 32.3 %, and 9.1 %, respectively. The power battery losses under NEDC, WLTC, CLTC, and 120 km/h were 5.4 %, 4 %, 4.8 %, and 1.3 %, respectively. The working efficiencies of the direct current (DC)/ DC and front and rear electric drive assemblies under the WLTC, NEDC, and CLTC conditions were less than 80 %. This study thoroughly demonstrates how driving conditions influence energy flow distribution and the operational state of critical components in BEVs. It provides a significant reference and foundation for the future optimization of BEV performance and energy consumption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8201,"journal":{"name":"Applied Thermal Engineering","volume":"269 ","pages":"Article 126035"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S135943112500626X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The battery electric vehicle (BEV) shows great potential in energy security guarantee and harmful emissions reduction resulting from road traffic increasing. The energy consumption characteristics and operation status of key components under different driving conditions have great impacts on the performance of EVs. However, studies on its variations under different driving conditions over the entire driving distance are limited. In this study, the BEV energy flow characteristics, energy loss, working conditions, and efficiencies of key components under the New European Driving Cycle (NEDC), Worldwide Harmonized Light-duty Test Cycle (WLTC), China Light-duty Vehicle Test Cycle (CLTC), and a constant speed of 120 km/h were comparatively investigated using a chassis dynamometer. The test results revealed that the power consumption rate at 120 km/h was much higher than those under other driving cycle conditions. The increased ratios of the power consumption rate under 120 km/h over NEDC, WLTC, and CLTC were 27.1 %, 16.5 %, and 26.3 %, respectively. However, the energy utilization of the BEV under 120 km/h is much higher than that under other conditions, owing to the relatively high efficiency of the working points and the lack of brake energy consumption. The proportions of motor and motor control unit (MCU) losses under NEDC, WLTC, CLTC, and 120 km/h were 28.8 %, 27.5 %, 32.3 %, and 9.1 %, respectively. The power battery losses under NEDC, WLTC, CLTC, and 120 km/h were 5.4 %, 4 %, 4.8 %, and 1.3 %, respectively. The working efficiencies of the direct current (DC)/ DC and front and rear electric drive assemblies under the WLTC, NEDC, and CLTC conditions were less than 80 %. This study thoroughly demonstrates how driving conditions influence energy flow distribution and the operational state of critical components in BEVs. It provides a significant reference and foundation for the future optimization of BEV performance and energy consumption.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同驾驶条件下纯电池电动汽车能量流的比较研究
纯电动汽车在保障能源安全、减少道路交通流量带来的有害气体排放方面显示出巨大的潜力。不同行驶工况下关键部件的能耗特性和运行状态对电动汽车的性能影响很大。然而,对其在不同驾驶条件下在整个行驶距离内的变化研究却很少。在新欧洲驾驶循环(NEDC)、全球统一轻型车测试循环(WLTC)、中国轻型车测试循环(CLTC)和恒速120 km/h下,采用底盘测功仪对纯电动汽车的能量流特性、能量损失、关键部件的工况和效率进行了对比研究。试验结果表明,120 km/h工况下的耗电量远高于其他工况下的耗电量。与NEDC、WLTC和CLTC相比,120 km/h下的电耗率分别提高了27.1%、16.5%和26.3%。然而,由于工作点的效率相对较高,并且缺乏制动能耗,在120 km/h下,BEV的能量利用率远高于其他条件下的能量利用率。在NEDC、WLTC、CLTC和120 km/h工况下,电机和电机控制单元(MCU)的损耗比例分别为28.8%、27.5%、32.3%和9.1%。在NEDC、WLTC、CLTC和120 km/h工况下,动力电池损耗分别为5.4%、4%、4.8%和1.3%。WLTC、NEDC和CLTC工况下直流/直流和前后电驱动组件的工作效率均小于80%。该研究充分展示了驱动条件如何影响纯电动汽车的能量流分布和关键部件的运行状态。为今后纯电动汽车性能和能耗的优化提供了重要的参考和基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Thermal Engineering
Applied Thermal Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
15.60%
发文量
1474
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Applied Thermal Engineering disseminates novel research related to the design, development and demonstration of components, devices, equipment, technologies and systems involving thermal processes for the production, storage, utilization and conservation of energy, with a focus on engineering application. The journal publishes high-quality and high-impact Original Research Articles, Review Articles, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor on cutting-edge innovations in research, and recent advances or issues of interest to the thermal engineering community.
期刊最新文献
Modulating pore size in honeycomb-like porous copper for pool boiling performance enhancement Experimental and numerical investigation of a large-scale polypropylene shell-and-tube latent heat storage system using sodium acetate trihydrate Analysis of a photovoltaic-thermal collector-based energy system for powering multi-unit residential buildings Thermal analysis and optimization of ultrasonic-assisted PCM with different ultrasonic frequencies Direct liquid cooling performance of electrically heated coils: experimental evaluation and heat-balance analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1