‘It's a shot, not a vaccine like MMR’: A new type of vaccine-specific scepticism on Twitter/X during the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Vaccine: X Pub Date : 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100620
Elena Semino , Tara Coltman-Patel , William Dance , Zsófia Demjén , Richard Gleave , Alison Mackey
{"title":"‘It's a shot, not a vaccine like MMR’: A new type of vaccine-specific scepticism on Twitter/X during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Elena Semino ,&nbsp;Tara Coltman-Patel ,&nbsp;William Dance ,&nbsp;Zsófia Demjén ,&nbsp;Richard Gleave ,&nbsp;Alison Mackey","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While it is well-known that vaccine hesitancy can be vaccine-specific, little is known about how people spontaneously evaluate different vaccines in comparison with one another, or the implications of such comparisons for vaccine attitudes. This paper first investigates how people posting on Twitter/X in 2020–2022 discussed the MMR vaccine and the COVID-19 vaccines in relation to each other. Next it reveals a new manifestation of vaccine scepticism, namely the claim that some vaccines, notably those against COVID-19, are in fact not vaccines.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 9-million-word ‘corpus’ was created, consisting of tweets containing references to the MMR vaccine posted in 2008–2022. First, tweets posted in 2020–2022 and also containing references to COVID-19 were coded for: (1) vaccine-specific evaluation, and (2) vaccine-related topic. Then, the whole corpus was analysed for tweets that contain expressions that challenge the status of a vaccine as a vaccine (e.g. ‘not a vaccine’, and the use of ‘shot’ in contrast with ‘vaccine’).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In 2020–2022, tweets mentioning COVID-19 alongside MMR show an increasing tendency to compare the COVID-19 vaccines unfavourably with MMR, based on perceived low effectiveness against infection. A further analysis of the whole corpus reveals:<ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>A tendency in 2020–2022 to challenge the status of COVID-19 vaccines, as well as flu vaccines, as vaccines;</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>A perceived contrast in 2020–2022 between ‘shot’ and ‘vaccine’, with the former being described as an inferior medical intervention.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Very little evidence of similar arguments being made about any vaccines in 2008–2019.</div></span></li></ul></div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Data from Twitter/X suggests that perceptions about low effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines against infection have led to a belief that they are inferior to MMR and other vaccines, or are not vaccines at all. It is important to address this new form of scepticism about vaccines that primarily prevent serious illness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100620"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590136225000142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

While it is well-known that vaccine hesitancy can be vaccine-specific, little is known about how people spontaneously evaluate different vaccines in comparison with one another, or the implications of such comparisons for vaccine attitudes. This paper first investigates how people posting on Twitter/X in 2020–2022 discussed the MMR vaccine and the COVID-19 vaccines in relation to each other. Next it reveals a new manifestation of vaccine scepticism, namely the claim that some vaccines, notably those against COVID-19, are in fact not vaccines.

Methods

A 9-million-word ‘corpus’ was created, consisting of tweets containing references to the MMR vaccine posted in 2008–2022. First, tweets posted in 2020–2022 and also containing references to COVID-19 were coded for: (1) vaccine-specific evaluation, and (2) vaccine-related topic. Then, the whole corpus was analysed for tweets that contain expressions that challenge the status of a vaccine as a vaccine (e.g. ‘not a vaccine’, and the use of ‘shot’ in contrast with ‘vaccine’).

Results

In 2020–2022, tweets mentioning COVID-19 alongside MMR show an increasing tendency to compare the COVID-19 vaccines unfavourably with MMR, based on perceived low effectiveness against infection. A further analysis of the whole corpus reveals:
  • A tendency in 2020–2022 to challenge the status of COVID-19 vaccines, as well as flu vaccines, as vaccines;
  • A perceived contrast in 2020–2022 between ‘shot’ and ‘vaccine’, with the former being described as an inferior medical intervention.
  • Very little evidence of similar arguments being made about any vaccines in 2008–2019.

Conclusion

Data from Twitter/X suggests that perceptions about low effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines against infection have led to a belief that they are inferior to MMR and other vaccines, or are not vaccines at all. It is important to address this new form of scepticism about vaccines that primarily prevent serious illness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine: X
Vaccine: X Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
102
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Development of identity assay for human papillomavirus genotypes using Simple Plex™ microfluidic automated ELISA COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy among hemodialysis patients: A mixed-methods study Social networks, environmental, and individual factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination and booster uptake– The prospective PRIME cohort study ‘It's a shot, not a vaccine like MMR’: A new type of vaccine-specific scepticism on Twitter/X during the COVID-19 pandemic Improving hepatitis a vaccination rate by reducing missed follow up vaccine appointments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1