COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy among hemodialysis patients: A mixed-methods study

IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Vaccine: X Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100623
Yuka Sugawara , Masao Iwagami , Kan Kikuchi , Toyohiro Hashiba , Sayaka Yabushita , Risa Hara , Toshio Hasegawa , Iino Yasuhiko , Masaomi Nangaku
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy among hemodialysis patients: A mixed-methods study","authors":"Yuka Sugawara ,&nbsp;Masao Iwagami ,&nbsp;Kan Kikuchi ,&nbsp;Toyohiro Hashiba ,&nbsp;Sayaka Yabushita ,&nbsp;Risa Hara ,&nbsp;Toshio Hasegawa ,&nbsp;Iino Yasuhiko ,&nbsp;Masaomi Nangaku","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vaccine hesitancy is a long-standing concept popularized during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, the underlying reasons and factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among hemodialysis patients have not been thoroughly investigated. Thus, here we investigated these issues using a mixed-methods approach.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A questionnaire survey was conducted of 1086 voluntary hemodialysis patients at 36 Japanese facilities. The questionnaire asked about detailed background factors, COVID-19 vaccination status, and reasons for non-vaccination. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted of vaccine hesitancy, and 10 unvaccinated patients were interviewed to further investigate their reasons for non-vaccination.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 54 (5.0 %) unvaccinated and 1032 (95.0 %) vaccinated participants. In the multivariate analysis, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was independently associated with a history of anaphylaxis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.05; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.46–11.21), living with an unvaccinated person (OR, 4.90; 95 % CI, 2.51–9.56), and using X (formerly Twitter) as the main source of information (aOR, 8.58; 95 % CI, 1.86–39.58), whereas those who received an annual influenza vaccination were less likely to show COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy (aOR, 0.19; 95 % CI, 0.1–0.36). The interview findings suggested that other factors associated with non-vaccination were not included in the questionnaire survey, such as missing opportunities to receive the initial vaccination and doctors' suggestions to avoid vaccination.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study combined qualitative and quantitative methods to identify several factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among hemodialysis patients. These results will be useful during future pandemics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100623"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590136225000178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Vaccine hesitancy is a long-standing concept popularized during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, the underlying reasons and factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among hemodialysis patients have not been thoroughly investigated. Thus, here we investigated these issues using a mixed-methods approach.

Methods

A questionnaire survey was conducted of 1086 voluntary hemodialysis patients at 36 Japanese facilities. The questionnaire asked about detailed background factors, COVID-19 vaccination status, and reasons for non-vaccination. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted of vaccine hesitancy, and 10 unvaccinated patients were interviewed to further investigate their reasons for non-vaccination.

Results

There were 54 (5.0 %) unvaccinated and 1032 (95.0 %) vaccinated participants. In the multivariate analysis, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was independently associated with a history of anaphylaxis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.05; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.46–11.21), living with an unvaccinated person (OR, 4.90; 95 % CI, 2.51–9.56), and using X (formerly Twitter) as the main source of information (aOR, 8.58; 95 % CI, 1.86–39.58), whereas those who received an annual influenza vaccination were less likely to show COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy (aOR, 0.19; 95 % CI, 0.1–0.36). The interview findings suggested that other factors associated with non-vaccination were not included in the questionnaire survey, such as missing opportunities to receive the initial vaccination and doctors' suggestions to avoid vaccination.

Conclusions

This study combined qualitative and quantitative methods to identify several factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among hemodialysis patients. These results will be useful during future pandemics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine: X
Vaccine: X Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
102
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Development of identity assay for human papillomavirus genotypes using Simple Plex™ microfluidic automated ELISA COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy among hemodialysis patients: A mixed-methods study Social networks, environmental, and individual factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination and booster uptake– The prospective PRIME cohort study ‘It's a shot, not a vaccine like MMR’: A new type of vaccine-specific scepticism on Twitter/X during the COVID-19 pandemic Improving hepatitis a vaccination rate by reducing missed follow up vaccine appointments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1