A phenomenological approach to female experiences in academic postgraduate settings in northern Brazil: Gender asymmetries and disparities

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 WOMENS STUDIES Womens Studies International Forum Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103068
M.N.S. Cardoso , M.J. Nobre , P. Santo
{"title":"A phenomenological approach to female experiences in academic postgraduate settings in northern Brazil: Gender asymmetries and disparities","authors":"M.N.S. Cardoso ,&nbsp;M.J. Nobre ,&nbsp;P. Santo","doi":"10.1016/j.wsif.2025.103068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In Brazil, despite the growing female participation in higher education, gender disparities remain a barrier to scientific advancement, with women facing many challenges in their scientific careers. This study examines the challenges female postgraduate students face in higher education, including obstacles and support systems, beyond traditional subject-object perspectives. To understand the meanings of the participants' experiences, the participants' dialogues were analyzed using Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology. They were selected using the linear Snowball Sampling Method. Lack of institutional support, inflexibility of the programs, mental and physical exhaustion, difficulties in balancing motherhood and academic duties, homophobia, excessive emphasis on productivity, and the pandemic context were the main challenges raised by participants. Psychological support, peers' bonding, and faith and spirituality were some of the avenues for care available in this setting. The university's psychological service was cited as a resource for students' mental health. Institutional support for health promotion was cited as both important and necessary, as well as an ethical-political training ground that may help to reduce existing inequities, particularly given the intersections of gender, race, and parenting, because the academic environment continues to be permeated by practices that severely contribute to the perpetuation of male chauvinism, homophobia, and a variety of other forms of gender violence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47940,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies International Forum","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 103068"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies International Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277539525000172","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Brazil, despite the growing female participation in higher education, gender disparities remain a barrier to scientific advancement, with women facing many challenges in their scientific careers. This study examines the challenges female postgraduate students face in higher education, including obstacles and support systems, beyond traditional subject-object perspectives. To understand the meanings of the participants' experiences, the participants' dialogues were analyzed using Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology. They were selected using the linear Snowball Sampling Method. Lack of institutional support, inflexibility of the programs, mental and physical exhaustion, difficulties in balancing motherhood and academic duties, homophobia, excessive emphasis on productivity, and the pandemic context were the main challenges raised by participants. Psychological support, peers' bonding, and faith and spirituality were some of the avenues for care available in this setting. The university's psychological service was cited as a resource for students' mental health. Institutional support for health promotion was cited as both important and necessary, as well as an ethical-political training ground that may help to reduce existing inequities, particularly given the intersections of gender, race, and parenting, because the academic environment continues to be permeated by practices that severely contribute to the perpetuation of male chauvinism, homophobia, and a variety of other forms of gender violence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对巴西北部学术研究生设置中的女性经验的现象学方法:性别不对称和差异
在巴西,尽管越来越多的女性参与高等教育,但性别差异仍然是科学进步的障碍,女性在科学事业中面临许多挑战。本研究探讨了女性研究生在高等教育中面临的挑战,包括障碍和支持系统,超越了传统的主客体视角。为了理解参与者体验的意义,我们运用梅洛-庞蒂现象学对参与者的对话进行了分析。他们是用线性雪球抽样法选择的。缺乏机构支持、方案缺乏灵活性、身心疲惫、难以平衡母性和学业职责、恐同、过分强调生产力以及流行病背景是参与者提出的主要挑战。在这种情况下,心理支持、同伴关系、信仰和精神是一些可获得照顾的途径。该大学的心理服务被认为是学生心理健康的资源。有人指出,促进健康的机构支持是重要和必要的,也是一个道德-政治培训基地,可能有助于减少现有的不平等现象,特别是考虑到性别、种族和养育子女的交叉,因为学术环境继续充斥着严重助长男权主义、恐同症和各种其他形式的性别暴力的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
63
审稿时长
79 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Studies International Forum (formerly Women"s Studies International Quarterly, established in 1978) is a bimonthly journal to aid the distribution and exchange of feminist research in the multidisciplinary, international area of women"s studies and in feminist research in other disciplines. The policy of the journal is to establish a feminist forum for discussion and debate. The journal seeks to critique and reconceptualize existing knowledge, to examine and re-evaluate the manner in which knowledge is produced and distributed, and to assess the implications this has for women"s lives.
期刊最新文献
Eroding freedoms: Perceived democratic backsliding and its impact on women's perceived empowerment in Türkiye Gendered survival under genocidal violence: A decolonial feminist narrative study of women and displaced families in Gaza Voltage drops (transitions) in economic empowerment to intrinsic empowerment of women in India Digital sisterhood: Live streaming feminism and network resilience in China Reinterpreting religious authority: Women as Islamic jurists for addressing gender justice in Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1