A comprehensive study on numerical homogenization of re-entrant honeycomb lattice and analytical model assessment

IF 2.7 3区 材料科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1007/s10999-024-09732-6
Rajnandini Das, Gurunathan Saravana Kumar
{"title":"A comprehensive study on numerical homogenization of re-entrant honeycomb lattice and analytical model assessment","authors":"Rajnandini Das,&nbsp;Gurunathan Saravana Kumar","doi":"10.1007/s10999-024-09732-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Re-entrant honeycomb lattice structures offer significant advantages, such as a high strength-to-weight ratio, superior energy absorption capabilities, and efficient material usage. However, for design optimization, the computational challenges posed by simulating extensive structures featuring lattice cells demand an exponential increase in degrees of freedom, inevitably prolonging computational time. The present work addresses some of the challenges in simulating these structures by employing numerical homogenization and investigating the effective elastic properties, aiming to reduce computational costs while maintaining accuracy. The homogenization approach is validated using experiments on lattice structures made in polymer. The study also evaluates the applicability of existing analytical models by comparing their predictions with numerical homogenization results. A comprehensive analysis considering the structural parameters, namely re-entrant angle (<span>\\(\\theta\\)</span>) and relative density (<span>\\(\\rho _{\\text {rel}}\\)</span>), is presented to understand the prediction accuracy of different analytical models. Both uncertainty and sensitivity analyses were conducted to quantify the influence of these structural parameters on the effective properties and to assess the variability due to probable geometric uncertainties introduced in manufacturing. Additionally, the influence of cell density on the homogenization model’s accuracy is also examined. The findings reveal good agreement between the lattice simulation, the homogenized model, and the experimental result within the linear elastic limit. The study infers that amongst the analytical models, Malek’s model is highly accurate for predicting <span>\\(E_{11}\\)</span>, <span>\\(E_{33}\\)</span>, and Poisson’s ratio <span>\\(\\mu _{12}\\)</span> for higher <span>\\(\\theta\\)</span> and up to 30% <span>\\(\\rho _{\\text {rel}}\\)</span> but shows significant deviations for <span>\\(G_{12}\\)</span>, <span>\\(G_{23}\\)</span>, and <span>\\(\\mu _{23}\\)</span>, necessitating numerical homogenization for higher accuracy beyond these ranges. The uncertainty analysis indicates that elastic moduli such as <span>\\(E_{11}/E_{s}\\)</span> and <span>\\(E_{33}/E_{s}\\)</span> exhibit the highest sensitivity to variations in strut thickness and angle, highlighting the need for precise manufacturing control to mitigate variability in effective elastic properties. The sensitivity analysis revealed that strut thickness (<i>t</i>) significantly influences the elastic and shear moduli, while the interaction of <span>\\(\\theta\\)</span> and <i>t</i> plays a crucial role in determining Poisson’s ratios for the auxetic honeycomb lattice. Additionally, numerical homogenization effectively predicts the elastic properties of re-entrant honeycomb structures with higher accuracy and lower computational costs. This comprehensive analysis enhances the understanding and practical application of both analytical and numerical methods in lattice structure design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":593,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design","volume":"21 1","pages":"181 - 207"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10999-024-09732-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Re-entrant honeycomb lattice structures offer significant advantages, such as a high strength-to-weight ratio, superior energy absorption capabilities, and efficient material usage. However, for design optimization, the computational challenges posed by simulating extensive structures featuring lattice cells demand an exponential increase in degrees of freedom, inevitably prolonging computational time. The present work addresses some of the challenges in simulating these structures by employing numerical homogenization and investigating the effective elastic properties, aiming to reduce computational costs while maintaining accuracy. The homogenization approach is validated using experiments on lattice structures made in polymer. The study also evaluates the applicability of existing analytical models by comparing their predictions with numerical homogenization results. A comprehensive analysis considering the structural parameters, namely re-entrant angle (\(\theta\)) and relative density (\(\rho _{\text {rel}}\)), is presented to understand the prediction accuracy of different analytical models. Both uncertainty and sensitivity analyses were conducted to quantify the influence of these structural parameters on the effective properties and to assess the variability due to probable geometric uncertainties introduced in manufacturing. Additionally, the influence of cell density on the homogenization model’s accuracy is also examined. The findings reveal good agreement between the lattice simulation, the homogenized model, and the experimental result within the linear elastic limit. The study infers that amongst the analytical models, Malek’s model is highly accurate for predicting \(E_{11}\), \(E_{33}\), and Poisson’s ratio \(\mu _{12}\) for higher \(\theta\) and up to 30% \(\rho _{\text {rel}}\) but shows significant deviations for \(G_{12}\), \(G_{23}\), and \(\mu _{23}\), necessitating numerical homogenization for higher accuracy beyond these ranges. The uncertainty analysis indicates that elastic moduli such as \(E_{11}/E_{s}\) and \(E_{33}/E_{s}\) exhibit the highest sensitivity to variations in strut thickness and angle, highlighting the need for precise manufacturing control to mitigate variability in effective elastic properties. The sensitivity analysis revealed that strut thickness (t) significantly influences the elastic and shear moduli, while the interaction of \(\theta\) and t plays a crucial role in determining Poisson’s ratios for the auxetic honeycomb lattice. Additionally, numerical homogenization effectively predicts the elastic properties of re-entrant honeycomb structures with higher accuracy and lower computational costs. This comprehensive analysis enhances the understanding and practical application of both analytical and numerical methods in lattice structure design.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design
International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL-MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.40%
发文量
41
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: It is the objective of this journal to provide an effective medium for the dissemination of recent advances and original works in mechanics and materials'' engineering and their impact on the design process in an integrated, highly focused and coherent format. The goal is to enable mechanical, aeronautical, civil, automotive, biomedical, chemical and nuclear engineers, researchers and scientists to keep abreast of recent developments and exchange ideas on a number of topics relating to the use of mechanics and materials in design. Analytical synopsis of contents: The following non-exhaustive list is considered to be within the scope of the International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design: Intelligent Design: Nano-engineering and Nano-science in Design; Smart Materials and Adaptive Structures in Design; Mechanism(s) Design; Design against Failure; Design for Manufacturing; Design of Ultralight Structures; Design for a Clean Environment; Impact and Crashworthiness; Microelectronic Packaging Systems. Advanced Materials in Design: Newly Engineered Materials; Smart Materials and Adaptive Structures; Micromechanical Modelling of Composites; Damage Characterisation of Advanced/Traditional Materials; Alternative Use of Traditional Materials in Design; Functionally Graded Materials; Failure Analysis: Fatigue and Fracture; Multiscale Modelling Concepts and Methodology; Interfaces, interfacial properties and characterisation. Design Analysis and Optimisation: Shape and Topology Optimisation; Structural Optimisation; Optimisation Algorithms in Design; Nonlinear Mechanics in Design; Novel Numerical Tools in Design; Geometric Modelling and CAD Tools in Design; FEM, BEM and Hybrid Methods; Integrated Computer Aided Design; Computational Failure Analysis; Coupled Thermo-Electro-Mechanical Designs.
期刊最新文献
Study on multilevel optimization strategy of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer seatback and seat pan Controlled dynamic response of a novel auxetic sandwich structure: A tunable tetrachiral core with dual-FG nanocomposite skin Smart piezoelectric composite: impact of piezoelectric ceramic microparticles embedded in heat-treated 7075-T651 aluminium alloy A comprehensive study on numerical homogenization of re-entrant honeycomb lattice and analytical model assessment Comparative investigation and nonlinear characterization of multi-stable electromagnetic vibration energy harvesters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1