Optimizing HIV testing: Comparing diagnostic signatures and assay performance in ART-treated and general screening populations

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinica Chimica Acta Pub Date : 2025-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2025.120207
Qian Liu , Xinru Liu , Le Chang , Huimin Ji , Huizhen Sun , Ying Yan , Junjie Xu , Lunan Wang
{"title":"Optimizing HIV testing: Comparing diagnostic signatures and assay performance in ART-treated and general screening populations","authors":"Qian Liu ,&nbsp;Xinru Liu ,&nbsp;Le Chang ,&nbsp;Huimin Ji ,&nbsp;Huizhen Sun ,&nbsp;Ying Yan ,&nbsp;Junjie Xu ,&nbsp;Lunan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.cca.2025.120207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Accurate and early HIV detection is crucial for improving outcomes and controlling transmission. This study compares HIV marker patterns and evaluates detection assay performance in general screening and ART-treated populations to enhance diagnostic accuracy and public health.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 196 blood donor samples that were initially reactive in blood center screening were collected across 17 provinces in China, along with 126 ART samples from people living with HIV (PLWH). HIV RNA, Ag/Ab, and western blot were conducted in both groups. CD4 T cell counts were assessed in PLWH. The performance of two antigen detection kits (Wantai, Livzon) and eight Ag/Ab kits (Roche, Abbott, KHB, InTec, Wantai, Livzon, Murex, Bio-rad) were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the ART group, all samples were Ag/Ab positive, with 32.5 % (41/126) having undetectable viral loads; NAT-positive samples showed a higher rate of complete bands in western blot compared to NAT-negative group (42.5 % vs 15.4 %, <em>P</em> = 0.021), while p17, p39, and p31 bands were often absent. 90.8 % (178/196) of blood donors were NAT-positive and Ag/Ab-positive. 4.6 % (9/196) of blood donors were NAT-positive but Ag/Ab-negative, these samples were also tested as NAT-only reactive in screening at blood centers, often showing only a p24 band or negative result in WB, indicating early acute infection. 3.6 % (7/196) of blood donors were confirmed as NAT-negative but Ag/Ab-positive, hinting that a small group on ART might attempt to donate blood. HIV serological kits showed 100 % positivity in the ART group. Fourth-generation kits, particularly the Roche Ag/Ab kit, showed the highest sensitivity (95.2 %) for NAT-positive donors.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This study highlights critical differences in HIV detection between ART-treated individuals and general screening populations, emphasizing the need for tailored diagnostic strategies to ensure blood transfusion safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10205,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Chimica Acta","volume":"570 ","pages":"Article 120207"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Chimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009898125000865","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Accurate and early HIV detection is crucial for improving outcomes and controlling transmission. This study compares HIV marker patterns and evaluates detection assay performance in general screening and ART-treated populations to enhance diagnostic accuracy and public health.

Methods

A total of 196 blood donor samples that were initially reactive in blood center screening were collected across 17 provinces in China, along with 126 ART samples from people living with HIV (PLWH). HIV RNA, Ag/Ab, and western blot were conducted in both groups. CD4 T cell counts were assessed in PLWH. The performance of two antigen detection kits (Wantai, Livzon) and eight Ag/Ab kits (Roche, Abbott, KHB, InTec, Wantai, Livzon, Murex, Bio-rad) were evaluated.

Results

In the ART group, all samples were Ag/Ab positive, with 32.5 % (41/126) having undetectable viral loads; NAT-positive samples showed a higher rate of complete bands in western blot compared to NAT-negative group (42.5 % vs 15.4 %, P = 0.021), while p17, p39, and p31 bands were often absent. 90.8 % (178/196) of blood donors were NAT-positive and Ag/Ab-positive. 4.6 % (9/196) of blood donors were NAT-positive but Ag/Ab-negative, these samples were also tested as NAT-only reactive in screening at blood centers, often showing only a p24 band or negative result in WB, indicating early acute infection. 3.6 % (7/196) of blood donors were confirmed as NAT-negative but Ag/Ab-positive, hinting that a small group on ART might attempt to donate blood. HIV serological kits showed 100 % positivity in the ART group. Fourth-generation kits, particularly the Roche Ag/Ab kit, showed the highest sensitivity (95.2 %) for NAT-positive donors.

Discussion

This study highlights critical differences in HIV detection between ART-treated individuals and general screening populations, emphasizing the need for tailored diagnostic strategies to ensure blood transfusion safety.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinica Chimica Acta
Clinica Chimica Acta 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
1268
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Clinica Chimica Acta is a high-quality journal which publishes original Research Communications in the field of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, defined as the diagnostic application of chemistry, biochemistry, immunochemistry, biochemical aspects of hematology, toxicology, and molecular biology to the study of human disease in body fluids and cells. The objective of the journal is to publish novel information leading to a better understanding of biological mechanisms of human diseases, their prevention, diagnosis, and patient management. Reports of an applied clinical character are also welcome. Papers concerned with normal metabolic processes or with constituents of normal cells or body fluids, such as reports of experimental or clinical studies in animals, are only considered when they are clearly and directly relevant to human disease. Evaluation of commercial products have a low priority for publication, unless they are novel or represent a technological breakthrough. Studies dealing with effects of drugs and natural products and studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not within the journal''s scope. Development and evaluation of novel analytical methodologies where applicable to diagnostic clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, including point-of-care testing, and topics on laboratory management and informatics will also be considered. Studies focused on emerging diagnostic technologies and (big) data analysis procedures including digitalization, mobile Health, and artificial Intelligence applied to Laboratory Medicine are also of interest.
期刊最新文献
Double-module ratio as a patient-based real-time quality control index for small shift detection and comparative assay. Novel biomarkers in bone pathophysiology: Establishing reference intervals and biological variations estimates for serum leptin, sclerostin, lipocalin-2, osteoprotegerin, resistin and Dickkopf-related protein-1 from the European biological variation study (EuBIVAS) populations. Screening and treatment of thalassemia The value of midregional proadrenomedullin to predict mortality in intensive care unit Application of volatilomic analysis by electronic nose for the detection of women with preeclampsia at high risk of developing chronic kidney disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1