Double-module ratio as a patient-based real-time quality control index for small shift detection and comparative assay

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinica Chimica Acta Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2025.120214
Yuanyuan Li, Xiaoling Chen, Ying Zhao
{"title":"Double-module ratio as a patient-based real-time quality control index for small shift detection and comparative assay","authors":"Yuanyuan Li,&nbsp;Xiaoling Chen,&nbsp;Ying Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.cca.2025.120214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Irregular fluctuations in patient data affect patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC) performance. Moreover, results among multiple instruments can be inconsistent. Here, we explored a simple index, double-module ratio, to improve PBRTQC performance through overcoming irregular fluctuations, and ensure consistency across multiple instruments in real time.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Laboratory results from the same departments tested centrally such that the original patient data fluctuated irregularly during the day were included. Albumin (Alb), calcium (Ca), cholinesterase (ChE), and total protein (TP) indexes derived from a single module were processed through conventional PBRTQC. The ratios calculated from PBRTQC data of two modules were defined as double-module ratios (R<sub>Alb</sub>, R<sub>Ca</sub>, R<sub>ChE,</sub> and R<sub>TP</sub>). The four index pairs were compared using various PBRTQC procedures, including conventional algorithms: moving average (MA), moving median, exponentially weighted MA, and moving standard deviation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All four ratios (R<sub>Alb</sub>, R<sub>Ca</sub>, R<sub>ChE</sub>, and R<sub>TP</sub>) were more powerful in identifying system error (SE) than their counterparts (Alb, Ca, ChE, and TP). These improvements were proportional to the degree of reduction in QC data variation after ratios were taken. In particular, R<sub>Alb</sub>, R<sub>Ca</sub>, and R<sub>TP</sub> could aid in detecting small SEs (about &lt;1.5 folds of the allowable total errors) significantly. Although ChE demonstrated almost no surveillance capacity for negative SEs, R<sub>ChE</sub> demonstrated a significant improvement. The impact of the ratios on random error detection was dependent on the indexes and PBRTQC parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>As a PBRTQC index, double-module ratios can facilitate small shift detection and ensure result consistency among various modules in real time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10205,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Chimica Acta","volume":"570 ","pages":"Article 120214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Chimica Acta","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009898125000932","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Irregular fluctuations in patient data affect patient-based real-time quality control (PBRTQC) performance. Moreover, results among multiple instruments can be inconsistent. Here, we explored a simple index, double-module ratio, to improve PBRTQC performance through overcoming irregular fluctuations, and ensure consistency across multiple instruments in real time.

Methods

Laboratory results from the same departments tested centrally such that the original patient data fluctuated irregularly during the day were included. Albumin (Alb), calcium (Ca), cholinesterase (ChE), and total protein (TP) indexes derived from a single module were processed through conventional PBRTQC. The ratios calculated from PBRTQC data of two modules were defined as double-module ratios (RAlb, RCa, RChE, and RTP). The four index pairs were compared using various PBRTQC procedures, including conventional algorithms: moving average (MA), moving median, exponentially weighted MA, and moving standard deviation.

Results

All four ratios (RAlb, RCa, RChE, and RTP) were more powerful in identifying system error (SE) than their counterparts (Alb, Ca, ChE, and TP). These improvements were proportional to the degree of reduction in QC data variation after ratios were taken. In particular, RAlb, RCa, and RTP could aid in detecting small SEs (about <1.5 folds of the allowable total errors) significantly. Although ChE demonstrated almost no surveillance capacity for negative SEs, RChE demonstrated a significant improvement. The impact of the ratios on random error detection was dependent on the indexes and PBRTQC parameters.

Conclusions

As a PBRTQC index, double-module ratios can facilitate small shift detection and ensure result consistency among various modules in real time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双模比作为基于患者的实时质量控制指标,用于小位移检测和比较分析。
目的:患者数据的不规则波动影响基于患者的实时质量控制(PBRTQC)性能。此外,多种仪器之间的结果可能不一致。在这里,我们探索了一个简单的指标,双模块比率,通过克服不规则波动来提高PBRTQC的性能,并确保多台仪器之间的实时一致性。方法:集中检测同一科室的实验室结果,使患者的原始数据在白天不规则波动。白蛋白(Alb)、钙(Ca)、胆碱酯酶(ChE)和总蛋白(TP)指标通过常规PBRTQC处理。根据PBRTQC数据计算出的两个模块的比值定义为双模块比值(RAlb、RCa、RChE和RTP)。采用各种PBRTQC程序,包括传统算法:移动平均(MA)、移动中位数、指数加权MA和移动标准差,对四个指标对进行比较。结果:所有四个比值(RAlb、RCa、RChE和RTP)在识别系统误差(SE)方面都比对应的比值(Alb、Ca、ChE和TP)更有效。这些改进与采取比率后QC数据变化的减少程度成正比。特别是,RAlb、RCa和RTP可以帮助检测小型se(大约 )。比率对随机错误检测的影响取决于指标和PBRTQC参数。结论:双模比作为PBRTQC的一项指标,可以方便小位移检测,实时保证各模块结果的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinica Chimica Acta
Clinica Chimica Acta 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
2.00%
发文量
1268
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Clinica Chimica Acta is a high-quality journal which publishes original Research Communications in the field of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, defined as the diagnostic application of chemistry, biochemistry, immunochemistry, biochemical aspects of hematology, toxicology, and molecular biology to the study of human disease in body fluids and cells. The objective of the journal is to publish novel information leading to a better understanding of biological mechanisms of human diseases, their prevention, diagnosis, and patient management. Reports of an applied clinical character are also welcome. Papers concerned with normal metabolic processes or with constituents of normal cells or body fluids, such as reports of experimental or clinical studies in animals, are only considered when they are clearly and directly relevant to human disease. Evaluation of commercial products have a low priority for publication, unless they are novel or represent a technological breakthrough. Studies dealing with effects of drugs and natural products and studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not within the journal''s scope. Development and evaluation of novel analytical methodologies where applicable to diagnostic clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, including point-of-care testing, and topics on laboratory management and informatics will also be considered. Studies focused on emerging diagnostic technologies and (big) data analysis procedures including digitalization, mobile Health, and artificial Intelligence applied to Laboratory Medicine are also of interest.
期刊最新文献
Performance evaluation of an automated mass spectrometry system for the measurement and isotyping of monoclonal immunoglobulins. Multi-omics biomarkers in cadmium-related lung toxicity and carcinogenesis. Harnessing exosomes for precision diagnostics and therapies in psychiatry disorders. Small extracellular vesicles as emerging biomarkers and therapeutic targets in neurodegenerative diseases. Explainable machine learning framework based on blood biomarkers and routine health information for assistive diagnosis and risk stratification of acute myocardial infarction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1