Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on brain death detection in German hospitals: a state-wide analysis of health data.

Daniela Schoene, Martin Roessler, Katharina Eder, Albrecht Günther, Konrad Pleul, Axel Rahmel, Kristian Barlinn
{"title":"Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on brain death detection in German hospitals: a state-wide analysis of health data.","authors":"Daniela Schoene, Martin Roessler, Katharina Eder, Albrecht Günther, Konrad Pleul, Axel Rahmel, Kristian Barlinn","doi":"10.1186/s42466-025-00368-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The low rate of organ donation in Germany has been linked to a deficit in the detection of patients with brain death (BD) in hospitals. It is unclear how crisis-related health system disruptions, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, affect this detection deficit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary data analysis of anonymized data from deceased patients with acute brain injury from Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt and Thuringia during the pre-pandemic and pandemic period (01/2019-12/2022). Pandemic phases were stratified according to the predominant SARS-CoV-2 variant. Logistic multilevel models were employed to assess outcomes including diagnosis of BD, deceased organ donations, missed cases with potential BD and organ donation-related interactions with the German Organ procurement organization. Models accounted for regional COVID-19 incidence and first-dose vaccination rates, as well as age, gender and types of brain injuries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11,100 deceased individuals from 136 hospitals were analyzed. An inverse association was observed between COVID-19 incidence and the determination of BD (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.94, 95%CI [0.91; 0.97]; p < 0.001) as well as deceased organ donation (aOR 0.94, 95%CI [0.90; 0.98]; p = 0.001). When stratified by pandemic phases, this inverse association was evident for both BD determination (aOR 0.92, 95%CI [0.87; 0.99]; p = 0.02) and deceased organ donation (aOR 0.90, 95%CI [0.83; 0.97]; p = 0.01) during the initial wild-type phase. In the alpha phase, the association was observed only for BD determination (aOR 0.76, 95%CI [0.59; 0.98]; p = 0.03). No association was found in subsequent pandemic phases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The initial impact on BD detection during the pandemic highlights the importance of the health system's adaptive capacity in times of crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94156,"journal":{"name":"Neurological research and practice","volume":"7 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-025-00368-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The low rate of organ donation in Germany has been linked to a deficit in the detection of patients with brain death (BD) in hospitals. It is unclear how crisis-related health system disruptions, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, affect this detection deficit.

Methods: Secondary data analysis of anonymized data from deceased patients with acute brain injury from Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt and Thuringia during the pre-pandemic and pandemic period (01/2019-12/2022). Pandemic phases were stratified according to the predominant SARS-CoV-2 variant. Logistic multilevel models were employed to assess outcomes including diagnosis of BD, deceased organ donations, missed cases with potential BD and organ donation-related interactions with the German Organ procurement organization. Models accounted for regional COVID-19 incidence and first-dose vaccination rates, as well as age, gender and types of brain injuries.

Results: A total of 11,100 deceased individuals from 136 hospitals were analyzed. An inverse association was observed between COVID-19 incidence and the determination of BD (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.94, 95%CI [0.91; 0.97]; p < 0.001) as well as deceased organ donation (aOR 0.94, 95%CI [0.90; 0.98]; p = 0.001). When stratified by pandemic phases, this inverse association was evident for both BD determination (aOR 0.92, 95%CI [0.87; 0.99]; p = 0.02) and deceased organ donation (aOR 0.90, 95%CI [0.83; 0.97]; p = 0.01) during the initial wild-type phase. In the alpha phase, the association was observed only for BD determination (aOR 0.76, 95%CI [0.59; 0.98]; p = 0.03). No association was found in subsequent pandemic phases.

Conclusion: The initial impact on BD detection during the pandemic highlights the importance of the health system's adaptive capacity in times of crisis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on brain death detection in German hospitals: a state-wide analysis of health data. Mind the guideline gap: emergent CT in patients with epilepsy for trauma rule-out-A retrospective cohort study. No disadvantages for women in acute stroke care in Germany: an analysis of access to stroke treatment services in Germany from 2017 to 2022. AI and Neurology. Neurological Research and Practice - the premier journal of the German Society of Neurology: recent development and future perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1