Consumption, relative deprivation and mental health: evidence from hedonic consumption.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2025-02-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1511547
Hao Li, Weihong Zeng
{"title":"Consumption, relative deprivation and mental health: evidence from hedonic consumption.","authors":"Hao Li, Weihong Zeng","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2025.1511547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent years, relative deprivation related to consumption has sparked intense debate, particularly as the COVID-19 pandemic caused incalculable economic losses worldwide. However, the relationship between relative deprivation related to consumption and mental health remains largely unexplored. This study investigates how both vertical (household-level) and horizontal (household-to-household) relative deprivation related to consumption affect mental health, with a focus on hedonic consumption, and identifies underlying channels and moderating factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyze data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) covering 88,144 observations from 2010 to 2018. Hedonic consumption is measured through expenditure on items such as jewelry, antiques, and entertainment, while consumption inequality is assessed using the Kakwani index. Mental health is evaluated using the CES-D and Kessler 6 scales. Ordinary least squares (OLS) and two-stage least squares (2SLS) methods are employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings show that reductions in hedonic consumption negatively impact mental health, with involuntary and sudden declines resulting in more pronounced deterioration. Furthermore, greater consumption inequality exacerbates mental health issues, and perceived unfair treatment amplifies this effect. Additionally, self-perception and trust levels are identified as key channels through which these effects. Furthermore, cultural variations and social capital are moderating roles to diminish the adverse mental health.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study advances our understanding of how relative deprivation related to consumption affects mental health and offers valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners aiming to address these challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"13 ","pages":"1511547"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1511547","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, relative deprivation related to consumption has sparked intense debate, particularly as the COVID-19 pandemic caused incalculable economic losses worldwide. However, the relationship between relative deprivation related to consumption and mental health remains largely unexplored. This study investigates how both vertical (household-level) and horizontal (household-to-household) relative deprivation related to consumption affect mental health, with a focus on hedonic consumption, and identifies underlying channels and moderating factors.

Methods: We analyze data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) covering 88,144 observations from 2010 to 2018. Hedonic consumption is measured through expenditure on items such as jewelry, antiques, and entertainment, while consumption inequality is assessed using the Kakwani index. Mental health is evaluated using the CES-D and Kessler 6 scales. Ordinary least squares (OLS) and two-stage least squares (2SLS) methods are employed.

Results: Our findings show that reductions in hedonic consumption negatively impact mental health, with involuntary and sudden declines resulting in more pronounced deterioration. Furthermore, greater consumption inequality exacerbates mental health issues, and perceived unfair treatment amplifies this effect. Additionally, self-perception and trust levels are identified as key channels through which these effects. Furthermore, cultural variations and social capital are moderating roles to diminish the adverse mental health.

Conclusion: This study advances our understanding of how relative deprivation related to consumption affects mental health and offers valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners aiming to address these challenges.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
消费、相对剥夺和心理健康:来自享乐消费的证据。
导言:近年来,与消费相关的相对剥夺引发了激烈的争论,特别是在2019冠状病毒病大流行在全球造成不可估量的经济损失的情况下。然而,与消费相关的相对剥夺与心理健康之间的关系在很大程度上仍未得到探索。本研究调查了与消费相关的垂直(家庭层面)和水平(家庭对家庭)相对剥夺如何影响心理健康,重点关注享乐消费,并确定了潜在的渠道和调节因素。方法:我们分析了来自中国家庭面板研究(CFPS)的数据,涵盖2010年至2018年的88144个观测值。享乐消费是通过珠宝、古董、娱乐等支出来衡量的,消费不平等是通过Kakwani指数来衡量的。使用CES-D和Kessler 6量表评估心理健康。采用普通最小二乘法(OLS)和两阶段最小二乘法(2SLS)。结果:我们的研究结果表明,享乐消费的减少会对心理健康产生负面影响,非自愿和突然的下降会导致更明显的恶化。此外,更大的消费不平等加剧了心理健康问题,而感知到的不公平待遇放大了这种影响。此外,自我感知和信任水平被认为是这些影响的关键渠道。此外,文化差异和社会资本对减少不良心理健康有调节作用。结论:本研究促进了我们对与消费相关的相对剥夺如何影响心理健康的理解,并为旨在应对这些挑战的政策制定者和从业者提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
期刊最新文献
Commentary: Effectiveness of telemedicine interventions on blood pressure control and self-management efficacy in hypertensive patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Determinants of self-monitoring adherence in type 2 diabetes: bridging the gap in patient care. Digital wellbeing experience in the workplace: development and validation of the Work-Related Human Computer Interaction Questionnaire. The impact of smart sports services on residents' sports participation: the mediating role of exercise self-efficacy and perceived usefulness. Clinical characteristics and etiological analysis of deep fungal infections in a general hospital in Southwest China (2020-2024).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1