An exploration of Michigan certified peer support specialists' perceptions on tobacco use and additional future supports.

IF 1.9 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Tobacco Prevention & Cessation Pub Date : 2025-02-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18332/tpc/200025
Sahana Lothumalla, Devin C Tomlinson, Isabelle Duguid, Chelsea Wilkins, Natalie D Bayrakdarian, Lauren Hellman, Mary Jannausch, Pam Werner, Adrienne Lapidos, Lara N Coughlin
{"title":"An exploration of Michigan certified peer support specialists' perceptions on tobacco use and additional future supports.","authors":"Sahana Lothumalla, Devin C Tomlinson, Isabelle Duguid, Chelsea Wilkins, Natalie D Bayrakdarian, Lauren Hellman, Mary Jannausch, Pam Werner, Adrienne Lapidos, Lara N Coughlin","doi":"10.18332/tpc/200025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Certified peer support specialists, recovery coaches and community health workers uniquely connect to individuals who smoke through shared experiences. This study examines peers' perceptions of tobacco cessation supports to enhance policy and intervention opportunities in rural and non-rural communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Peers (n=172) responded to a needs assessment available from 30 November 2023 to 1 February 2024. Peers were asked questions about their perceptions of currently available and additional support for tobacco cessation. We report overall ratings of these services, as well as ratings stratified by rurality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over half of peers perceived widely available tobacco cessation services (Quitline, counseling, NRT, medications, peer-to-peer support) as somewhat effective. Peers tended to favor financial accessibility, holistic health approaches, flexible approaches focused on harm reduction, and increased tobacco cessation services awareness, as well as peer support as additional services. When stratified by rurality, more rural-residing peers reported current tobacco cessation services as at least somewhat effective, but called for greater access to these services and/or the need for novel approaches specifically for individuals in rural communities. Rural peers emphasized the importance of more holistic support, cessation services awareness, virtual opportunities, peer-led services, and healthcare provider education for stigma prevention than their urban counterparts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most peers view existing supports as somewhat effective, with peer-to-peer support rated highest. Rural-residing peers favored holistic and virtual supports and urban-residing peers emphasized harm reduction and healthcare coverage, suggesting future cessation efforts within the peer workforce should address rural-specific barriers and leverage community-centered, flexible approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":44546,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","volume":"11 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11848760/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/200025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Certified peer support specialists, recovery coaches and community health workers uniquely connect to individuals who smoke through shared experiences. This study examines peers' perceptions of tobacco cessation supports to enhance policy and intervention opportunities in rural and non-rural communities.

Methods: Peers (n=172) responded to a needs assessment available from 30 November 2023 to 1 February 2024. Peers were asked questions about their perceptions of currently available and additional support for tobacco cessation. We report overall ratings of these services, as well as ratings stratified by rurality.

Results: Over half of peers perceived widely available tobacco cessation services (Quitline, counseling, NRT, medications, peer-to-peer support) as somewhat effective. Peers tended to favor financial accessibility, holistic health approaches, flexible approaches focused on harm reduction, and increased tobacco cessation services awareness, as well as peer support as additional services. When stratified by rurality, more rural-residing peers reported current tobacco cessation services as at least somewhat effective, but called for greater access to these services and/or the need for novel approaches specifically for individuals in rural communities. Rural peers emphasized the importance of more holistic support, cessation services awareness, virtual opportunities, peer-led services, and healthcare provider education for stigma prevention than their urban counterparts.

Conclusions: Most peers view existing supports as somewhat effective, with peer-to-peer support rated highest. Rural-residing peers favored holistic and virtual supports and urban-residing peers emphasized harm reduction and healthcare coverage, suggesting future cessation efforts within the peer workforce should address rural-specific barriers and leverage community-centered, flexible approaches.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
155
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of heated tobacco products in Cairo and Giza at points of sale: Availability, advertisement, and promotion. An exploration of Michigan certified peer support specialists' perceptions on tobacco use and additional future supports. Inequitable exposure to tobacco product litter among adolescents in California, USA. Stakeholder perspectives of tobacco use on campus and implementation of a tobacco-free policy at a Midwest university. Efficacy of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation in populations with psychiatric and/or substance use problems: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1