Metabolic syndrome including both elevated blood pressure and elevated fasting plasma glucose is associated with higher mortality risk: a prospective study.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1186/s13098-025-01628-5
Shu Li, Chi Pang Wen, Huakang Tu, Sicong Wang, Xue Li, Andi Xu, Wenyuan Li, Xifeng Wu
{"title":"Metabolic syndrome including both elevated blood pressure and elevated fasting plasma glucose is associated with higher mortality risk: a prospective study.","authors":"Shu Li, Chi Pang Wen, Huakang Tu, Sicong Wang, Xue Li, Andi Xu, Wenyuan Li, Xifeng Wu","doi":"10.1186/s13098-025-01628-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Metabolic syndrome (MetS) encompasses a collection of metabolic abnormalities. This study aims to determine which combination of MetS components has the highest mortality risk, and to investigate the causal relationships between MetS components and longevity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective analyses were conducted on 340,196 participants from the MJ cohort at baseline, and 121,936 participants had follow-up MetS information. We defined MetS according to the NCEP ATP III criteria. The study's outcomes included mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, and all causes combined. We employed Cox proportional hazard models to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals. Multivariable Mendelian randomization (MVMR) was employed to infer causality using the genetic data of MetS components and longevity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Elevated blood pressure (BP) was the initial split for all-cause mortality, cancer mortality, and CVD mortality. Participants with MetS, especially those with elevated BP and elevated fasting plasma glucose (FPG), had higher mortality risks than those with other types of MetS. In the MJ cohort, participants with elevated BP and FPG (BG-type MetS) had a 44% (HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.37-1.51), 73% (HR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.62-1.84), and 34% (HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.27-1.42) increased risk of all-cause mortality, cancer mortality, and CVD mortality, respectively, compared with non-BG-type MetS (12%, 24%, 5%). The highest mortality rate and mortality risk were observed in participants with BG-type MetS at baseline and follow-up (mortality rate/1000 person years = 9.73, 95% CI = 8.81-10.74; HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.35-1.72). SBP and FPG increases that were genetically proxied to a 1-standard deviation higher level decreased the probabilities of living to the 90th percentile age by 41% (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.40-0.86) and 32% (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.48-0.98) in MVMR, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals with BG-type MetS are at a higher risk of death than those with other types of MetS. Therefore, these individuals should be targeted to improve MetS outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11106,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","volume":"17 1","pages":"72"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11863470/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-025-01628-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) encompasses a collection of metabolic abnormalities. This study aims to determine which combination of MetS components has the highest mortality risk, and to investigate the causal relationships between MetS components and longevity.

Methods: Prospective analyses were conducted on 340,196 participants from the MJ cohort at baseline, and 121,936 participants had follow-up MetS information. We defined MetS according to the NCEP ATP III criteria. The study's outcomes included mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, and all causes combined. We employed Cox proportional hazard models to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals. Multivariable Mendelian randomization (MVMR) was employed to infer causality using the genetic data of MetS components and longevity.

Results: Elevated blood pressure (BP) was the initial split for all-cause mortality, cancer mortality, and CVD mortality. Participants with MetS, especially those with elevated BP and elevated fasting plasma glucose (FPG), had higher mortality risks than those with other types of MetS. In the MJ cohort, participants with elevated BP and FPG (BG-type MetS) had a 44% (HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.37-1.51), 73% (HR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.62-1.84), and 34% (HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.27-1.42) increased risk of all-cause mortality, cancer mortality, and CVD mortality, respectively, compared with non-BG-type MetS (12%, 24%, 5%). The highest mortality rate and mortality risk were observed in participants with BG-type MetS at baseline and follow-up (mortality rate/1000 person years = 9.73, 95% CI = 8.81-10.74; HR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.35-1.72). SBP and FPG increases that were genetically proxied to a 1-standard deviation higher level decreased the probabilities of living to the 90th percentile age by 41% (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.40-0.86) and 32% (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.48-0.98) in MVMR, respectively.

Conclusions: Individuals with BG-type MetS are at a higher risk of death than those with other types of MetS. Therefore, these individuals should be targeted to improve MetS outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
代谢综合征包括血压升高和空腹血糖升高与更高的死亡风险相关:一项前瞻性研究
背景:代谢综合征(MetS)包括一系列代谢异常。本研究旨在确定哪种代谢代谢成分组合具有最高的死亡风险,并调查代谢代谢成分与寿命之间的因果关系。方法:对基线时来自MJ队列的340196名参与者进行前瞻性分析,121936名参与者有随访的MetS信息。我们根据NCEP ATP III标准定义MetS。该研究的结果包括心血管疾病(CVD)、癌症和所有原因导致的死亡率。采用Cox比例风险模型计算风险比(hr)和95%置信区间。采用多变量孟德尔随机化(MVMR),利用MetS成分和寿命的遗传数据推断因果关系。结果:血压升高是导致全因死亡率、癌症死亡率和心血管疾病死亡率的首要因素。MetS患者,尤其是血压升高和空腹血糖(FPG)升高的患者,死亡率高于其他类型MetS患者。在MJ队列中,与非bg型MetS(12%, 24%, 5%)相比,BP和FPG (bg型MetS)升高的参与者的全因死亡率、癌症死亡率和心血管疾病死亡率分别增加44% (HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.37-1.51)、73% (HR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.62-1.84)和34% (HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.27-1.42)。在基线和随访时,bg型MetS患者的死亡率和死亡风险最高(死亡率/1000人年= 9.73,95% CI = 8.81-10.74;Hr = 1.52, 95% ci = 1.35-1.72)。在MVMR中,SBP和FPG的增加在遗传上高于1个标准差的水平,分别使活到90百分位年龄的概率降低41% (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.40-0.86)和32% (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.48-0.98)。结论:bg型MetS患者的死亡风险高于其他类型MetS患者。因此,这些个体应该以改善MetS结果为目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome publishes articles on all aspects of the pathophysiology of diabetes and metabolic syndrome. By publishing original material exploring any area of laboratory, animal or clinical research into diabetes and metabolic syndrome, the journal offers a high-visibility forum for new insights and discussions into the issues of importance to the relevant community.
期刊最新文献
Association of endothelial activation and stress index with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with diabetic kidney disease: a population-based prospective study. Abstracts from The XXV Brazilian Diabetes Society Meeting. Association of dual SGLT-2 inhibitor and GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy with colon cancer risk in post-polypectomy patients with diabetes: a target trial emulation. The effect of lifestyle interventions on cognitive function in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prognostic effect of estimated glucose disposal rate on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among individuals cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1