Personalized Culinary Medicine: Qualitative Analyses of Perceptions from Participants in Action and Contemplation Stages of Change Through a One-Year Bi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrients Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.3390/nu17040704
Adi Finkelstein, Maggi A Budd, Brianna E Gray, Jacob Mirsky, Amir Tirosh, Rani Polak
{"title":"Personalized Culinary Medicine: Qualitative Analyses of Perceptions from Participants in Action and Contemplation Stages of Change Through a One-Year Bi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Adi Finkelstein, Maggi A Budd, Brianna E Gray, Jacob Mirsky, Amir Tirosh, Rani Polak","doi":"10.3390/nu17040704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: A high-quality diet is linked to cardiometabolic risk reduction. Culinary medicine interventions are effective in improving nutrition and health outcomes. While personalized nutrition is usually related to improving patient outcomes through knowledge about gene-nutrient interactions, tailoring interventions based on participant motivation and biopsychosocial environment may improve outcomes. The stage of change framework categorized participants based on current behaviors and intentions for future behaviors. Our goal was to assess participant perceptions regarding accomplishments, challenges, and needs up to one year following a culinary medicine program according to their stage of change at entry. <b>Methods</b>: Participant perceptions were collected at (1) the intervention end (open-ended questionnaire), (2) six months (semi-structured interview), and (3) twelve months (open-ended questionnaire). Analysis was performed inductively following a thematic analysis approach. <b>Results</b>: Twenty-four participants completed 70 perspectives (58/12 from participants who entered at a contemplation/action stage of change). Perceptions were related to (1) acquire culinary and nutritional knowledge: improve knowledge about healthy nutrition, use new recipes, and ask for hands-on cooking classes; (2) improve culinary and self-regulatory skills: improve confidence in the kitchen, expand cooking skills, organizing and planning, and creativity and pleasure; (3) adopt home cooking and healthy nutrition: adopt home-cooking habits, spreading home cooking to other family members, improve nutrition habits throughout the day, and decrease consumption of ultra-processed food; and (4) address the sustainability of health changes: achievements in maintaining long-term health changes, challenges in maintaining long-term health changes, and facilitators for a long-term change. <b>Conclusions</b>: These results provide one-year-long information about participant facilitators, barriers, and needs for making home-cooking changes categorized to the participant stage of change at program entry. This information can help reform effective personalized culinary medicine programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19486,"journal":{"name":"Nutrients","volume":"17 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11858461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrients","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17040704","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A high-quality diet is linked to cardiometabolic risk reduction. Culinary medicine interventions are effective in improving nutrition and health outcomes. While personalized nutrition is usually related to improving patient outcomes through knowledge about gene-nutrient interactions, tailoring interventions based on participant motivation and biopsychosocial environment may improve outcomes. The stage of change framework categorized participants based on current behaviors and intentions for future behaviors. Our goal was to assess participant perceptions regarding accomplishments, challenges, and needs up to one year following a culinary medicine program according to their stage of change at entry. Methods: Participant perceptions were collected at (1) the intervention end (open-ended questionnaire), (2) six months (semi-structured interview), and (3) twelve months (open-ended questionnaire). Analysis was performed inductively following a thematic analysis approach. Results: Twenty-four participants completed 70 perspectives (58/12 from participants who entered at a contemplation/action stage of change). Perceptions were related to (1) acquire culinary and nutritional knowledge: improve knowledge about healthy nutrition, use new recipes, and ask for hands-on cooking classes; (2) improve culinary and self-regulatory skills: improve confidence in the kitchen, expand cooking skills, organizing and planning, and creativity and pleasure; (3) adopt home cooking and healthy nutrition: adopt home-cooking habits, spreading home cooking to other family members, improve nutrition habits throughout the day, and decrease consumption of ultra-processed food; and (4) address the sustainability of health changes: achievements in maintaining long-term health changes, challenges in maintaining long-term health changes, and facilitators for a long-term change. Conclusions: These results provide one-year-long information about participant facilitators, barriers, and needs for making home-cooking changes categorized to the participant stage of change at program entry. This information can help reform effective personalized culinary medicine programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个性化烹饪医学:通过一项为期一年的双中心随机对照试验,对参与者在行动和思考阶段变化的看法进行定性分析。
背景:高质量的饮食与降低心脏代谢风险有关。烹饪医学干预措施在改善营养和健康结果方面是有效的。虽然个性化营养通常与通过了解基因-营养相互作用来改善患者预后有关,但基于参与者动机和生物-心理-社会环境的定制干预可能会改善预后。变化阶段框架根据当前行为和对未来行为的意图对参与者进行分类。我们的目标是评估参与者对烹饪医学项目一年后的成就、挑战和需求的看法,根据他们在入学时的变化阶段。方法:在(1)干预结束时(开放式问卷),(2)六个月时(半结构化访谈)和(3)十二个月时(开放式问卷)收集参与者的看法。采用主题分析方法进行归纳分析。结果:24名参与者完成了70个视角(58/12来自进入沉思/行动阶段的参与者)。感知与(1)获得烹饪和营养知识有关:提高健康营养知识,使用新食谱,并要求动手烹饪课程;(2)提高烹饪和自我调节技能:提高对厨房的信心,拓展烹饪技能、组织策划、创造力和愉悦感;(3)采用家庭烹饪和健康营养:采用家庭烹饪习惯,将家庭烹饪传播给其他家庭成员,改善全天的营养习惯,减少超加工食品的消费;(4)解决健康变化的可持续性:维持长期健康变化的成就,维持长期健康变化的挑战,以及促进长期变化的因素。结论:这些结果提供了为期一年的关于参与者促进因素、障碍和家庭烹饪变化需求的信息,这些变化在项目进入时被归类为参与者变化阶段。这些信息可以帮助改革有效的个性化烹饪医学项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrients
Nutrients NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
15.30%
发文量
4599
审稿时长
16.74 days
期刊介绍: Nutrients (ISSN 2072-6643) is an international, peer-reviewed open access advanced forum for studies related to Human Nutrition. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.
期刊最新文献
Iodine Content of Commercially Available Iodized Salts in Hungary Determined by Iodometric Titration: Implications for the Effectiveness of Salt Iodization. Effects of Fortified Formula Milk Supplementation on Neurocognitive Development and the Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Preschool Children: A Cluster-Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Ten-Year Trends in Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D in Slovenia (2014-2023): Laboratory-Based Data from Tested Individuals and COVID-19-Period Changes. A Prolonged Nightly Fasting Plus Telehealth Coaching Intervention (PNF+) for Men on Androgen Deprivation Therapy for PCa: A Pilot Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial. Prevalence of Nutrition Standards Use by Municipalities in Government-Owned or Operated Properties, United States, 2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1