Intelligibility in Context Scale: validity of the Brazilian-Portuguese version.

IF 0.8 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY CoDAS Pub Date : 2025-02-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/e20240138en
Matheus Francoy Alpes, Julia Cipolato, Ana Rita Valente, Jacqueline Aquino do Nascimento, Patrícia Pupin Mandrá, Marisa Lousada
{"title":"Intelligibility in Context Scale: validity of the Brazilian-Portuguese version.","authors":"Matheus Francoy Alpes, Julia Cipolato, Ana Rita Valente, Jacqueline Aquino do Nascimento, Patrícia Pupin Mandrá, Marisa Lousada","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/e20240138en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of the study was to validate the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS-BP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty children (mean age in months = 55.05, SD = 4.2), 15 with parental or teacher concerns regarding their speech and 45 without concerns, underwent assessment using the phonology subtest of ABFW - Child Language Test. The percentage of consonants correct (PCC) was calculated and parents completed the ICS to evaluate their children's intelligibility with various communication partners. Descriptive statistics were obtained. Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman' tests were used for independent group comparisons and correlation calculations, respectively. Linear regression models were established to predict PCC. Internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach's alpha. A Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) was used to analyse sensitivity and specificity. Significance was considered for p-values under 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of parents reported a mean score of 4.6 in a total of 5 (SD .10) at the ICS responses with different listeners, with better performance with other acquaintances and members of the family. The ICS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = 0.95). Positive correlations were found between ICS scores and PCC (r = .790) and a simple linear model was established between the ICS mean score and PCC. Sensitivity (0.98) and specificity (0.87) were considered high.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ICS-BP indicated high psychometric values, suggesting that this instrument can be used to measure the intelligibility of Brazilian children.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":"37 3","pages":"e20240138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11864765/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoDAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/e20240138en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to validate the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS-BP).

Methods: Sixty children (mean age in months = 55.05, SD = 4.2), 15 with parental or teacher concerns regarding their speech and 45 without concerns, underwent assessment using the phonology subtest of ABFW - Child Language Test. The percentage of consonants correct (PCC) was calculated and parents completed the ICS to evaluate their children's intelligibility with various communication partners. Descriptive statistics were obtained. Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman' tests were used for independent group comparisons and correlation calculations, respectively. Linear regression models were established to predict PCC. Internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach's alpha. A Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) was used to analyse sensitivity and specificity. Significance was considered for p-values under 0.05.

Results: The majority of parents reported a mean score of 4.6 in a total of 5 (SD .10) at the ICS responses with different listeners, with better performance with other acquaintances and members of the family. The ICS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = 0.95). Positive correlations were found between ICS scores and PCC (r = .790) and a simple linear model was established between the ICS mean score and PCC. Sensitivity (0.98) and specificity (0.87) were considered high.

Conclusion: The ICS-BP indicated high psychometric values, suggesting that this instrument can be used to measure the intelligibility of Brazilian children.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语境可理解度量表:巴西-葡萄牙语版本的有效性。
目的:本研究的目的是验证巴西-葡萄牙语版本的语境可理解性量表(ICS-BP)。方法:60名儿童(平均月龄55.05,SD = 4.2)采用ABFW -儿童语言测试语音亚测试进行评估,其中15名儿童存在父母或教师对其语言的担忧,45名儿童无担忧。计算孩子的辅音正确率(PCC),并让家长完成ICS,以评估孩子与不同交流伙伴的可理解性。进行描述性统计。Kruskal-Wallis检验和Spearman检验分别用于独立组比较和相关性计算。建立线性回归模型预测PCC。内部一致性采用Cronbach's alpha计算。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析敏感性和特异性。p值小于0.05时认为具有显著性。结果:大多数家长在与不同听者的ICS反应中平均得分为4.6分(SD .10),与其他熟人和家庭成员的ICS反应表现较好。ICS具有良好的内部一致性(α = 0.95)。ICS评分与PCC呈正相关(r = .790), ICS平均评分与PCC之间建立了简单的线性模型。敏感性(0.98)和特异性(0.87)较高。结论:ICS-BP具有较高的心理测量值,表明该工具可用于测量巴西儿童的可理解性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CoDAS
CoDAS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Validation of the Central Auditory Processing Self-Perception Questionnaire (QAPAC) applied to students, parents, and teachers. Labyrinth scale in the differential diagnosis between autism spectrum disorder and language disorder. Aerodynamic measurements in singers at usual, low, and high frequencies. Fundamental frequency measures in the comparison of habitual and disguised voices. COVID-19-related voice disorders: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1