Impact of YouTube® videos on knowledge on tracheal intubation for anesthesiologist trainees: a prospective observational study.

Annachiara Marra, Andrea Uriel de Siena, Carmine Iacovazzo, Maria Vargas, Nicola Cesarano, Claudia Collà Ruvolo, Giuseppe Celentano, Pasquale Buonanno
{"title":"Impact of YouTube® videos on knowledge on tracheal intubation for anesthesiologist trainees: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Annachiara Marra, Andrea Uriel de Siena, Carmine Iacovazzo, Maria Vargas, Nicola Cesarano, Claudia Collà Ruvolo, Giuseppe Celentano, Pasquale Buonanno","doi":"10.1186/s44158-025-00232-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social media platforms, initially developed for recreational use, have evolved into major sources for disseminating information, including medical information for patients and healthcare providers in many disciplines. This study aimed to evaluate the educational potential of YouTube® videos in teaching tracheal intubation to first-year anesthesiology residents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of \"University Federico II-AORN A. Cardarelli\" (protocol no. 00010735). We analyzed the first 10 YouTube videos identified via the search term \"tracheal intubation.\" Each video was evaluated for misinformation and informational completeness via a 5-item Likert scale. After providing written consent, fifty-seven first-year anesthesiology residents watched these videos and completed a 22-item questionnaire before and after viewing. Each correct answer received one point, whereas incorrect answers received 0 points, allowing for comparisons of knowledge acquisition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The videos exhibited moderate quality (median score, 3; range, 1-5) and low informational completeness (median score, 1.432; range, 1.000-2.046). Residents' scores increased modestly by one point after viewing (from 13 to 14; p < 0.001). Misinformation was positively correlated with the number of followers (beta coefficient: 0.00002, p < 0.001), video duration (beta coefficient: 0.0042, p < 0.05), and linking ratio (beta coefficient: 0.242, p < 0.05). Conversely, informational completeness was inversely correlated with video duration (beta coefficient: - 0.001121, p < 0.05) and the thumbs-up/view ratio (beta coefficient: - 67.4697, p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While YouTube® has potential as an accessible educational tool, current video selection offers limited improvement in residents' understanding of tracheal intubation. Our findings highlight the need for greater curation and better-quality control of medical educational content on YouTube® to optimize its effectiveness and provide accurate information. Institutions could play a key role in producing reliable, guideline-based videos that better support learning objectives in anesthesiology training.</p>","PeriodicalId":73597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","volume":"5 1","pages":"12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-025-00232-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social media platforms, initially developed for recreational use, have evolved into major sources for disseminating information, including medical information for patients and healthcare providers in many disciplines. This study aimed to evaluate the educational potential of YouTube® videos in teaching tracheal intubation to first-year anesthesiology residents.

Methods: This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of "University Federico II-AORN A. Cardarelli" (protocol no. 00010735). We analyzed the first 10 YouTube videos identified via the search term "tracheal intubation." Each video was evaluated for misinformation and informational completeness via a 5-item Likert scale. After providing written consent, fifty-seven first-year anesthesiology residents watched these videos and completed a 22-item questionnaire before and after viewing. Each correct answer received one point, whereas incorrect answers received 0 points, allowing for comparisons of knowledge acquisition.

Results: The videos exhibited moderate quality (median score, 3; range, 1-5) and low informational completeness (median score, 1.432; range, 1.000-2.046). Residents' scores increased modestly by one point after viewing (from 13 to 14; p < 0.001). Misinformation was positively correlated with the number of followers (beta coefficient: 0.00002, p < 0.001), video duration (beta coefficient: 0.0042, p < 0.05), and linking ratio (beta coefficient: 0.242, p < 0.05). Conversely, informational completeness was inversely correlated with video duration (beta coefficient: - 0.001121, p < 0.05) and the thumbs-up/view ratio (beta coefficient: - 67.4697, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: While YouTube® has potential as an accessible educational tool, current video selection offers limited improvement in residents' understanding of tracheal intubation. Our findings highlight the need for greater curation and better-quality control of medical educational content on YouTube® to optimize its effectiveness and provide accurate information. Institutions could play a key role in producing reliable, guideline-based videos that better support learning objectives in anesthesiology training.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
YouTube®视频对麻醉师培训生气管插管知识的影响:一项前瞻性观察研究。
背景:最初为娱乐用途开发的社交媒体平台已演变为传播信息的主要来源,包括为许多学科的患者和医疗保健提供者提供的医疗信息。本研究旨在评估YouTube®视频在第一年麻醉学住院医师气管插管教学中的教育潜力。方法:本研究经“University Federico II-AORN A. Cardarelli”伦理委员会批准(协议号:00010735)。我们分析了通过搜索“气管插管”找到的前10个YouTube视频。通过5项李克特量表评估每个视频的错误信息和信息完整性。在提供书面同意后,57名第一年麻醉科住院医师观看了这些视频,并在观看前后完成了一份22项的问卷调查。每个正确答案得1分,而每个错误答案得0分,允许知识获取的比较。结果:视频质量中等(中位数为3分;范围,1-5)和低信息完备性(中位数得分,1.432;范围内,1.000 - -2.046)。居民的得分在观看后小幅上升了1分(从13分上升到14分;p结论:虽然YouTube®有潜力成为一种可访问的教育工具,但目前的视频选择对居民对气管插管的理解的改善有限。我们的研究结果强调需要对YouTube®上的医学教育内容进行更大的管理和更好的质量控制,以优化其有效性并提供准确的信息。各机构可在制作可靠的、以指导方针为基础的录像方面发挥关键作用,以更好地支持麻醉学培训的学习目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Can algorithms come to the rescue of a failing heart? Machine learning, artificial intelligence, and decision-making in cardiogenic shock. Implementation and learning curve in AI-assisted fluid management during abdominal oncologic surgery: a retrospective observational study. Anesthetic strategies for manual removal of retained placenta: an observational cohort study at a university referral center. Which calcium preparation should we use in paediatric resuscitation? A comprehensive review of basic physiology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical evidence. Fascial plane blocks in labor: promise or illusion? A narrative review with expert opinion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1